NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

[Raiderdave]

Got no problems with the Swans having a bit more money to cover the extra cost of living in Sydney. maybe this is another reason why the Storm dominate because it is cheaper and nicer to live in the worlds most livable city.

please
Based on this ridiculous premise ... the NRL's 9 Sydney clubs should all get more money to spend of their players salaries , its a crock & only designed to keep NSW sides competitive by giving them an advantage....
if Melb was a more expensive city to live in ... would the VFL give its ten clubs 1 million more each to spend ... of course it wouldn't.

NRL players go to the Storm to play at a successful professional football club.. they would accept less to do so as it enhances their chances of representative football & the personal glory that goes with it.

If VFL players are only looking at what price it is to buy a 3 beddie at North Mead when the swines offer them a contract ,like its a .. tad .. more expensive to go there ..so they would consider not going to play at a succesful club that will help their career & earn them more money further down the track
then they are passionless .. unprofessional ..... grubs

a 350K contract in Sydney ... or a 350K contract at the western bullfrogs
are we expected to believe a player will feel disadvantaged by going to Sydney

FMD.. VFL fans are dumb.

wow what a comprehension FAIL!

Its a comparison moron!

The majority of AFL teams are located OUTSIDE NSW where the cost of living is less. There to even out the "effective" salary caps the simplest way is to increase the cap for the Giants and Swans. Therefore only 2 out of 18 clubs require change. Not to mention the fact that NSW is an expansion state so the majority of players drafted to the swans will be required to relocate. It only makes sense they do not suffer relocation upheaval plus a financial penalty.

Where as the majority of NRL clubs are in NSW so the simplest way to even out the "effective" caps is to decrease caps outside NSW. Therefore only 5 of 16 clubs require change.

Dumbass

oh what F'ing snot

how bout the same for everyone ... Like we do
and get rid of the draft ... like we did

if your sport is as national as you wombats claim it is .... this should have very little effect & the comp has integrity & is even.

but of course then
reality bites

don't it

[Xman]

Yep, and RL still has more money to come in, a couple hundred million AT LEAST

please show how $1.118B in cash is less than $0.925B

Moron!

[Raiderdave]

Less TV, less games yet more money, how sad.

so ch9 paiiid more than ch7 did they?

the only reason the nrl got close is because they sold control, hence this discussion

Ch 7.. 400 Million for 4 games a week
Ch 9..... 450 Million for 3

can I help you with anything else

[ParraEelsNRL]

Ummm, as usual, you put all the contra in with VFL and left the ARLC's out.

Hahahah you sneaky bastard.

[Xman]

Ummm, as usual, you put all the contra in with VFL and left the ARLC's out.

Hahahah you sneaky bastard.

no thats cash for both

http://www.AFL.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-21/l ... al/4212336

[Raiderdave]

Yep, and RL still has more money to come in, a couple hundred million AT LEAST

please show how $1.118B in cash is less than $0.925B

Moron!

we've only finalised our TV deal .....
925 Million cash
to
1.1 Billion Million cash for the VFL .. in total

we have at least another 100 m from the kiwis to come ..... meaning we're already in front $$$ wise
so anything we get for online , naming ..& radio rights.. will put us even further ahead of you lot
& again... we don't have about 6 black holes sucking this cash away like a godfreys 2100w vacume cleaner
we win
end of

[ParraEelsNRL]

As it says there, a lot of that is made up with contra xman, ffs, learn to read.

[pussycat]

Their not banned from ch7. The agreement was to show AFL on 7mate to qld and nsw, just like NRl is on gem to AFL states.

Every AFL gets a decent go on FTA TV, even better if they make the 8. The suns and giants are shown on FTA 20 times the number of times the raiders are in the first 20 rounds last year!

Interesting how youre defending it but the raiders and other clubs are furious... [/quot]


The Suns/GWS would get far, far less exposure on a secondary channel than on PTV. Is'nt that the whole idea of it?

And yes they are banned, Not to be shown on the main channel for 5 years - signed Kerry Stokes. I guess D just rolled over and went for the money, At the very same time the NRL are dictating to CH 9 about greater exposure for the Storm.... Who licks who's balls.

the reasons FTA coverage is preferred is twofold:
1. more exposure because more people have access to FA, even 2nd digital channels.

2. free viewership for fans and potential fans

As for the AFL rolling over, what are you on? Every team in WA, SA, NSW and QLD is on FA every week. Last year the AFL was only on TV in NSW and QLD maybe twice a weekend. Now their are 4 live games, BETTER than the NRL in their own homeland!

The Storm are on gem in Victoria, not CH9 They got, what less than 8 FTA games in to Melbourne last year? Yeah, theyre doing well!

I just addressed that point! do you bother to read posts other than your own?


# secondary channels GWS/Suns match would get a lot less exposure then say Canberra on PTV. Its Exposure clubs want - exposure to the largest possible audience. and the two new kids on the block have really missed out big time there. There is know one to blame but D. Hes the one that rolled over for the cash. I guess he needs it to cover some of there losses(or should I say half the teams loses)

[Xman]

Yep, and RL still has more money to come in, a couple hundred million AT LEAST

please show how $1.118B in cash is less than $0.925B

Moron!

we've only finalised our TV deal .....
925 Million cash
to
1.1 Billion Million cash for the VFL .. in total

we have at least another 100 m from the kiwis to come ..... meaning we're already in front $$$ wise
so anything we get for online , naming ..& radio rights.. will put us even further ahead of you lot
& again... we don't have about 6 black holes sucking this cash away like a godfreys 2100w vacume cleaner
we win
end of

i didnt realise ch9 showed nrl in nz

[Xman]

As it says there, a lot of that is made up with contra xman, ffs, learn to read.

no, it says 1.118B CASH, plus contra is extra

[ParraEelsNRL]

Nope.

All included.

[Xman]

Their not banned from ch7. The agreement was to show AFL on 7mate to qld and nsw, just like NRl is on gem to AFL states.

Every AFL gets a decent go on FTA TV, even better if they make the 8. The suns and giants are shown on FTA 20 times the number of times the raiders are in the first 20 rounds last year!

Interesting how youre defending it but the raiders and other clubs are furious... [/quot]


The Suns/GWS would get far, far less exposure on a secondary channel than on PTV. Is'nt that the whole idea of it?

And yes they are banned, Not to be shown on the main channel for 5 years - signed Kerry Stokes. I guess D just rolled over and went for the money, At the very same time the NRL are dictating to CH 9 about greater exposure for the Storm.... Who licks who's balls.

the reasons FTA coverage is preferred is twofold:
1. more exposure because more people have access to FA, even 2nd digital channels.

2. free viewership for fans and potential fans

As for the AFL rolling over, what are you on? Every team in WA, SA, NSW and QLD is on FA every week. Last year the AFL was only on TV in NSW and QLD maybe twice a weekend. Now their are 4 live games, BETTER than the NRL in their own homeland!

The Storm are on gem in Victoria, not CH9 They got, what less than 8 FTA games in to Melbourne last year? Yeah, theyre doing well!

I just addressed that point! do you bother to read posts other than your own?


# secondary channels GWS/Suns match would get a lot less exposure then say Canberra on PTV. Its Exposure clubs want - exposure to the largest possible audience. and the two new kids on the block have really missed out big time there. There is know one to blame but D. Hes the one that rolled over for the cash. I guess he needs it to cover some of there losses(or should I say half the teams loses)

Yes, i read your posts. Not sure why though.

digital FTA take up would be FAR higher than PayTV.

As for AD caving in, How is 4 live games to ever state, plus home teams on every week, caving in?

[Raiderdave]

please show how $1.118B in cash is less than $0.925B

Moron!

we've only finalised our TV deal .....
925 Million cash
to
1.1 Billion Million cash for the VFL .. in total

we have at least another 100 m from the kiwis to come ..... meaning we're already in front $$$ wise
so anything we get for online , naming ..& radio rights.. will put us even further ahead of you lot
& again... we don't have about 6 black holes sucking this cash away like a godfreys 2100w vacume cleaner
we win
end of

i didnt realise ch9 showed nrl in nz

sky do , & they pay the NRL for the rights to.....
happy for the VFL to include their earnings for VFL coverage in NZ in their total rights deal

what ?

they did ............

[Xman]

Nope.

All included.

The cash component is $1.118 billion, with $135 million extra in contra arrangements. The cash contribution is $369 million more than in the previous broadcast deal.

it says CASH

[Raiderdave]

Nope.

All included.

The cash component is $1.118 billion, with $135 million extra in contra arrangements. The cash contribution is $369 million more than in the previous broadcast deal.

it says CASH

so all we need is 93m from the kiwis ... & its all ova folks