Talking Footy

SportCapital wrote: Tue Jun 11, 2019 7:03 pm

Can anyone tell me where the weekly ratings breakdown tables are published?
My graphs are a few weeks behind...

the Tables have are a few weeks behind as well..

they are not on Sports industry / web

Wow , about 6million this week

Last AFL round with 5 games shown in isolation and no split games:
the AFL recorded total ratings of 3334k from only 5 games with 3 on FTA. (There was a 4th FTA game between the eagles and Sydney but these figures havent been shown by OZTAM because the game was only shown in Perth and SYdney so it didnt make the top 20.)

The average for this round was 667k per game. Foxtel average was 235k. FTA total was 2159 from 3 games at an average of 720k

Previous AFL round with 9 games shown concurrently:
Total ratings of 3750k from 9 games at an average of 417k per game

Previous NRL round with 8 games shown in isolation:
3603k at an average of 450k per game

These results destroy a few NRL theories said regularly on here:
1. Showing multiple AFL games at the same time to different audiences may be a minor advantage but doesnt increase FTA ratings that much over single FTA games

2. Split matches doesnt come close to making up for the drop in ratings by showing games at the same time. The AFL's ratings were up an average of around 250k PER GAME when shown in isolation compared to shown concurrently

3. The AFL's 5 NON-SPLIT games shown in isolation almost rated the same as the NRL's 8 games shown in isolation, and averaged nearly 120k extra per game. This included both codes with 3 FTA games in the round

DESTROYED again

Fishbowl,alert

AFLcrap1 wrote: Wed Jun 12, 2019 12:59 pm

Fishbowl,alert

So you dont agree that data destroys your claims? Interesting

NlolRL wrote: Wed Jun 12, 2019 1:02 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Wed Jun 12, 2019 12:59 pm

Fishbowl,alert

So you dont agree that data destroys your claims? Interesting

It’s facts, reality of course it won’t be the same as his claims

notaleaguefan wrote: Wed Jun 12, 2019 4:27 pm

NlolRL wrote: Wed Jun 12, 2019 1:02 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Wed Jun 12, 2019 12:59 pm

Fishbowl,alert

So you dont agree that data destroys your claims? Interesting

It’s facts, reality of course it won’t be the same as his claims

Lol you usiñg the word facts in a sentence is the funniest thing on the net

AFLcrap1 wrote: Wed Jun 12, 2019 7:57 pm

notaleaguefan wrote: Wed Jun 12, 2019 4:27 pm

NlolRL wrote: Wed Jun 12, 2019 1:02 pm

So you dont agree that data destroys your claims? Interesting

It’s facts, reality of course it won’t be the same as his claims

Lol you usiñg the word facts in a sentence is the funniest thing on the net

atleast i presented data. if you think its flawed say why

regards to the seasonal ratings, taking out SOO
it is going to be very close.
($1.90 a piece.

if NRL includes Origin it will be approx a 8-10mill win.

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 10:38 am

regards to the seasonal ratings, taking out SOO
it is going to be very close.
($1.90 a piece.

if NRL includes Origin it will be approx a 8-10mill win.

which means nothing given the figures show the AFL rates almost the same from 5 games shown in isolation as they do for 9 games shown concurrently.

The cumulative total is therefore complete BS

NlolRL wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:29 am

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 10:38 am

regards to the seasonal ratings, taking out SOO
it is going to be very close.
($1.90 a piece.

if NRL includes Origin it will be approx a 8-10mill win.

which means nothing given the figures show the AFL rates almost the same from 5 games shown in isolation as they do for 9 games shown concurrently.

The cumulative total is therefore complete BS

In your fishbowl opinion

AFLcrap1 wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 2:40 pm

NlolRL wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:29 am

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 10:38 am

regards to the seasonal ratings, taking out SOO
it is going to be very close.
($1.90 a piece.

if NRL includes Origin it will be approx a 8-10mill win.

which means nothing given the figures show the AFL rates almost the same from 5 games shown in isolation as they do for 9 games shown concurrently.

The cumulative total is therefore complete BS

In your fishbowl opinion

feel free to disagree with the data. Funny enough not a single tosser has challenged the data I presented

Funnily enough no one cares
Funnily enough Rl is the most watched sport in this country ..no matter how many times you go around the fish bowl screeching but but but but but but

AFLcrap1 wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:47 pm

Funnily enough no one cares
Funnily enough Rl is the most watched sport in this country ..no matter how many times you go around the fish bowl screeching but but but but but but

no surprise you and the others wont touch this data, it destroys the very arguments you've been holding on to for years.

Nope
We are sick of the same old shit over & over .
You keep your but buts .
Swim in the fishbowl
We will take gold
Gold gold