Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

Hahaha, nice find Xman. More evidence of what broadcasters/media and ourselves have known all along. =D>

RL 132 Million
AFL 120 Million

no one needs to know anything else .............

I would love an independant source for those figures. Got any? I've asked you before but you've failed to provide any.

the cumulative figures mean nothing because they relate to the way each code is broadcast ie live or not, more games, longer season, subscription rates, clashing schedules etc...

The two important figures are the:
- TV rights, because they show the worth of each product to the network and fund things like growth

- overall audience size which is demonstrated in polls such as this

Both of these results come from Independant and readily available sources, and we all know who wins these.

NSWAFL wrote:

There isn't one. We all know how unreliable regional ratings are. The RL dipsh1ts need to stop relying on that.

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

RL 132 Million
AFL 120 Million

no one needs to know anything else .............

I would love an independant source for those figures. Got any? I've asked you before but you've failed to provide any.

the cumulative figures mean nothing because they relate to the way each code is broadcast ie live or not, more games, longer season, subscription rates, clashing schedules etc...

The two important figures are the:
- TV rights, because they show the worth of each product to the network and fund things like growth

- overall audience size which is demonstrated in polls such as this

Both of these results come from Independant and readily available sources, and we all know who wins these.

Oztam... regionaltam .. Thinktv ... & a dozen others

there independant .. as you've been told 50 times
they have no reason to misrepresent figures ... they wouldn't publish them if they were inaccurate

your code is 2nd .... embrace the truth
stop living in a dream world

K

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

I would love an independant source for those figures. Got any? I've asked you before but you've failed to provide any.

the cumulative figures mean nothing because they relate to the way each code is broadcast ie live or not, more games, longer season, subscription rates, clashing schedules etc...

The two important figures are the:
- TV rights, because they show the worth of each product to the network and fund things like growth

- overall audience size which is demonstrated in polls such as this

Both of these results come from Independant and readily available sources, and we all know who wins these.

Oztam... regionaltam .. Thinktv ... & a dozen others

there independant .. as you've been told 50 times
they have no reason to misrepresent figures ... they wouldn't publish them if they were inaccurate

your code is 2nd .... embrace the truth
stop living in a dream world

K

The 5 city ratings are evenly counted for both codes and independent. Any problems with that?

Xman wrote:

Multiple Morgan polls show the AFL have a higher TV following than the NRL even including soo. The 5 city ratings are an easy win for the AFL. They also dominate the media and have a significantly higher tv rights deal.

You can keep the regional ratings. Looks like they're serving you well LOL

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Multiple Morgan polls show the AFL have a higher TV following than the NRL even including soo. The 5 city ratings are an easy win for the AFL. They also dominate the media and have a significantly higher tv rights deal.

You can keep the regional ratings. Looks like they're serving you well LOL

keep the metro
when all Australians are counted ... its an easy win to RL & getting easier each year
we have more followers ... its a no brainer

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Multiple Morgan polls show the AFL have a higher TV following than the NRL even including soo. The 5 city ratings are an easy win for the AFL. They also dominate the media and have a significantly higher tv rights deal.

You can keep the regional ratings. Looks like they're serving you well LOL

keep the metro
when all Australians are counted ... its an easy win to RL & getting easier each year
we have more followers ... its a no brainer

Shown by figures that aren't even published? Where are they? Show us all

If you had more followers why does poll after poll show different? Why does the AFL gf win so often even though it's shown in a ratings graveyard time slot? You're deluded to think the NRL has more followers in general let alone for tv.

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

keep the metro
when all Australians are counted ... its an easy win to RL & getting easier each year
we have more followers ... its a no brainer

Shown by figures that aren't even published? Where are they? Show us all

If you had more followers why does poll after poll show different? Why does the AFL gf win so often even though it's shown in a ratings graveyard time slot? You're deluded to think the NRL has more followers in general let alone for tv.

they have all regional data (oztam)
but only publish the top 40 shows ... you know this

we make it every week
the AFL... twice a year if they're lucky

RL .. Australias most popular sport

transmission ends

Raiderdave wrote:

Oztam... regionaltam .. Thinktv ... & a dozen others

there independant .. as you've been told 50 times
they have no reason to misrepresent figures ... they wouldn't publish them if they were inaccurate

your code is 2nd .... embrace the truth
stop living in a dream world

K

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Shown by figures that aren't even published? Where are they? Show us all

If you had more followers why does poll after poll show different? Why does the AFL gf win so often even though it's shown in a ratings graveyard time slot? You're deluded to think the NRL has more followers in general let alone for tv.

they have all regional data (oztam)
but only publish the top 40 shows ... you know this

we make it every week
the AFL... twice a year if they're lucky

RL .. Australias most popular sport

transmission ends

Not what I meant. Where are these cumulative figures published? Where's the link?

Answer why the AFL beat the NRL in tv rights and all polls

NSWAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Oztam... regionaltam .. Thinktv ... & a dozen others

there independant .. as you've been told 50 times
they have no reason to misrepresent figures ... they wouldn't publish them if they were inaccurate

your code is 2nd .... embrace the truth
stop living in a dream world

K

Each and every one of those have more holes than Swiss cheese outside of metro areas, Dave! Show the REAL figures!

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

they have all regional data (oztam)
but only publish the top 40 shows ... you know this

we make it every week
the AFL... twice a year if they're lucky

RL .. Australias most popular sport

transmission ends

Not what I meant. Where are these cumulative figures published? Where's the link?

Answer why the AFL beat the NRL in tv rights and all polls

all the ratings from all sources ... metro ... pay .. & regional are ALL available ....all published
the rest is called maths f wit

we haven't done our latest deal
we'll be right there after we do

& the deal after that ..... it will be ...... see ya

Raiderdave wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Oztam... regionaltam .. Thinktv ... & a dozen others

there independant .. as you've been told 50 times
they have no reason to misrepresent figures ... they wouldn't publish them if they were inaccurate

your code is 2nd .... embrace the truth
stop living in a dream world

K

Each and every one of those have more holes than Swiss cheese outside of metro areas, Dave! Show the REAL figures!

the only holes are in the myths & theories from feebleball fans about why rugby league has beaten the AFL 3 years in a row for veiwers

5 INDIGENOUS ALL STARS V NRL ALL STARS Network 9 729,000 422,000 16,000 286,000 1,000 5,000