Page 55 of 112

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 8:50 pm
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Xman wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Didn't have fox ratings in 09/10 or 11 did they, they had no fox ratings before them years either unless they actually played on Fox Sports which we all know was very rare.

Stop with the excuses, when both codes had only FTA without simulcasting, your biggest was smashed by Parramatta with less games shown on FTA and with Parramatta only getting their games shown into NSW and QLD.

You can't change those facts no matter how you twist it.
dumbass, before this year the AFL had NO live games. Their FN games was delayed by 1-3hrs

Is Victoria all of Australia redneck?

What about the states outside of that shithole you come from, did their FTA games get live coverage?

Don't answer, you'll only lie again.
:roll:
Yeah, the Swans were live as were the Lions. How are expansion clubs going to compete with heartland clubs?

All other clubs were on significant delay.

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:15 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
I just told you not to answer and what did you do?

Made another bloody excuse.

Fair dinkum :lol:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:31 pm
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
I just told you not to answer and what did you do?

Made another bloody excuse.

Fair dinkum :lol:
It wasnt an excuse. You were comparing the eels to Collingwood last year when Collingwood were never shown live. You then claimed some AFL teams were shown live and I said the popularity of an expansion team can't be compared to a heartland team.

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:12 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Not last year you imba, when both last had good years in 2009 ffs.

Why would I compare my wooden spoon sides TV coverage on FTA against one of the teams that has been in GF's over the last couple of seasons flying high?

I think the eels only had a handful of FTA games this year, we didn't deserve the ones we got to be fair.

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:15 am
by pussycat
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
hahaha. what a derp.

Any excuse to protect the vfl and collinton.

Hey xmoron, do you think any of those FTA games that Parra played were ever shown on Delay into NSW when they were playing the Broncos or another out of state/country team?

Yeah, two Friday night games in a row, 1 live, 1 delayed, did parra get the live game each time, or did they have a few delayed Friday games plus the delayed Sunday FTA game?

As I said, you're a moron with all the excuses. But the excuses don't add up, do they DUMBARSE?


Are'nt Parramatta the only team to Crack 400k for a regular season match on Fox, and didn't they do it twice ? You would think if Collingwood were as well support as the mushroom people claim, they would have done it at least once.

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:13 am
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Not last year you imba, when both last had good years in 2009 ffs.

Why would I compare my wooden spoon sides TV coverage on FTA against one of the teams that has been in GF's over the last couple of seasons flying high?

I think the eels only had a handful of FTA games this year, we didn't deserve the ones we got to be fair.
Yeah because the AFL had live coverage in 2009 too :roll:

#-o

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:54 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Idiot.

Fair dinkum.

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:38 pm
by Stewie
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Idiot.

Fair dinkum.
The AFL wasn't live into Melbourne pre-2012 on a regular basis. The only times it was live was if the FTA game was being broadcasted from Adelaide and Perth or if the game at the MCG had sold out, and even then it was a struggle for Seven/Ten to show it live. 2012 is the year that the AFL finally had live Friday night Football on a regular basis that the nRL has had for the last 5 years, and the AFL absolutely slaughtered the nRL.

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:57 am
by ParraEelsNRL
I don't care you bumbling fuck, you have all these FTA games and have for years, if it's on FTA, you can't fucking watch it anywhere else before the station who has it shows it, so stop with more excuses, it's pathetic.

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:00 pm
by piesman2011
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
I don't care you bumbling fuck, you have all these FTA games and have for years, if it's on FTA, you can't fucking watch it anywhere else before the station who has it shows it, so stop with more excuses, it's pathetic.
I use to listen to it on the radio it was a much better call.

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:08 pm
by Stewie
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
I don't care you bumbling fuck, you have all these FTA games and have for years, if it's on FTA, you can't fucking watch it anywhere else before the station who has it shows it, so stop with more excuses, it's pathetic.
Well ignorance is bliss.

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:17 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Yes, yes it is rettard.

Tell me dumbarse, when 7, 9 or 10 had FTA games, could anyone else show them before or during their coverage?

Simple question for a simpleton I'd say.

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:18 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
And the fumbles will come back with another



But but but but but but but but but but but but but but but but but but but but.

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:19 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
I also see that the NRL got 12 programs in the top 100 this year while the vFL got 6 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:




Hahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahha, and that was the Metros only :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:29 pm
by piesman2011
No point arguing with zelots they will ignore any valid points and only focus on the negatives as they see them. Many will listen to the game on radio rather then watch it delayed by an hour on TV. On friday night you could say up to midnight to watch it on TV with a stack load of adds on at half time (about 10.30 at night) or you could listen to it on radio and go to bed a 11pm and watch the second half on TV delayed if you wanted to (when your team won of course). More people will watch a game live because there is no way to discover the result faster then live and you dont have to stay up really late to watch it. Oh and you can watch it live by using illegal streaming or so I hear.