www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
Fred , as far as the loan goes you are dead set wrong ! its a loan not a gift and regardless of what spin you put on it ,regardless of intentions , it will need to be paid back.Fred wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 8:51 amLooks like loans and ratings aren't your thing pussy. If there was only 1 box they would still extrapolate to how many in the population was watching. It would be accurate all that much obviously but they still infer to the population ...pussycat wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 8:18 amAssume you had just 1 meter in Sydney and 1 meter in Melbourne. The next day when you looked at the results on media week it would say ratings for Sydney = 1, Rating for Melbourne = 1 . Both the same. Even though the 1 Sydney meter represents 5m potential league voters and the 1 Melbourne Meter represents 4.6 m potential AFL voters.
Fred wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 3:33 pmThe loan I am pretty sure I'm right. Any person with an ounce of financial clout... shit even mum and dad investors know you don't use your money to invest ... you borrow, claim the interest as a tax right off against income earned and watch the asset hopefully increase in price.
Alan Bond had a sound business mind also.The_Wookie wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 3:37 pmIts precisely why the loan - I assume this is the Etihad purchase one - makes for a sound choice. Its almost like we have knowledgeable business people on the Commission or something.Fred wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 3:33 pmThe loan I am pretty sure I'm right. Any person with an ounce of financial clout... shit even mum and dad investors know you don't use your money to invest ... you borrow, claim the interest as a tax right off against income earned and watch the asset hopefully increase in price.
just like last year, the AFL clubs who are tenants at Etihad will continue to pay their rent. That rent goes, plus other revenue the stadium makes, goes to the AFL who use it to pay the loan. The stadium makes a handy profit plus provides capital growth. It isnt merely a loan to fund the competitionpussycat wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 4:48 pmFred wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 3:33 pmThe loan I am pretty sure I'm right. Any person with an ounce of financial clout... shit even mum and dad investors know you don't use your money to invest ... you borrow, claim the interest as a tax right off against income earned and watch the asset hopefully increase in price.
If you borrow money , regardless of the loan purpose or your intention you are accountable for the ? $280m.
The comment was in reply to a thread about the uncertainties that lye ahead. It was a negative NRL article but I suppose that's alright.The_Wookie wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 5:18 pmYou've been wrong about AFL financials for years. Just fuck off already.
Just the other week you were talking about the uncertainties of future tv funding. And who knows what else lies ahead. so how can you be so certain they will continue to make a handy profit?NlolRL wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 5:34 pmjust like last year, the AFL clubs who are tenants at Etihad will continue to pay their rent. That rent goes, plus other revenue the stadium makes, goes to the AFL who use it to pay the loan. The stadium makes a handy profit plus provides capital growth. It isnt merely a loan to fund the competitionpussycat wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 4:48 pmFred wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 3:33 pmThe loan I am pretty sure I'm right. Any person with an ounce of financial clout... shit even mum and dad investors know you don't use your money to invest ... you borrow, claim the interest as a tax right off against income earned and watch the asset hopefully increase in price.
If you borrow money , regardless of the loan purpose or your intention you are accountable for the ? $280m.
Lol little pissy cat is suffering little man syndromepussycat wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 6:55 pmThe comment was in reply to a thread about the uncertainties that lye ahead. It was a negative NRL article but I suppose that's alright.The_Wookie wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 5:18 pmYou've been wrong about AFL financials for years. Just fuck off already.
How so?
AFL lied about how much was in the future.
AFL profit has been less than ours in recent.
Our revenue has increased more over the past four years than yours has over the past five.
Or is it the $80m in hand outs the AFL has to give to its clubs each year that you objet to.
because the stadiums profit is built around attendances, not TV. Ours are going north toopussycat wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:12 pmJust the other week you were talking about the uncertainties of future tv funding. And who knows what else lies ahead. so how can you be so certain they will continue to make a handy profit?NlolRL wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 5:34 pmjust like last year, the AFL clubs who are tenants at Etihad will continue to pay their rent. That rent goes, plus other revenue the stadium makes, goes to the AFL who use it to pay the loan. The stadium makes a handy profit plus provides capital growth. It isnt merely a loan to fund the competitionpussycat wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 4:48 pm
If you borrow money , regardless of the loan purpose or your intention you are accountable for the ? $280m.
The AFL does make a small handy profit unlike your nrlol fudging the books again this year, claims it made a profit but only did so by getting an advance from next years broadcast deal!pussycat wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 7:12 pmJust the other week you were talking about the uncertainties of future tv funding. And who knows what else lies ahead. so how can you be so certain they will continue to make a handy profit?NlolRL wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 5:34 pmjust like last year, the AFL clubs who are tenants at Etihad will continue to pay their rent. That rent goes, plus other revenue the stadium makes, goes to the AFL who use it to pay the loan. The stadium makes a handy profit plus provides capital growth. It isnt merely a loan to fund the competitionpussycat wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 4:48 pm
If you borrow money , regardless of the loan purpose or your intention you are accountable for the ? $280m.
that it was going to take the AFL on with, it got knocked back for their loan to pay the billsthe annual report hasnt been released floggoAFLcrap1 wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 8:28 pmSo can you post evidence of the NRLfudging the books this year .
Off ya go Mr fabricator .
& why the fuck do you keep bringing BANK LOAN BANK loan into thread after thread .
You have already started 2 different threads about the BANK LOAN ..yet you still can't help ranting about it in threads that have nothing to do with it .
Get some new material
Self own age at its bestleagueiscrap wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 9:33 pmthe annual report hasnt been released floggoAFLcrap1 wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 8:28 pmSo can you post evidence of the NRLfudging the books this year .
Off ya go Mr fabricator .
& why the fuck do you keep bringing BANK LOAN BANK loan into thread after thread .
You have already started 2 different threads about the BANK LOAN ..yet you still can't help ranting about it in threads that have nothing to do with it .
Get some new material
but their last years annual report was reported as a profit only to be found they had borrowred money!
the year before, or the one before that, they reported a profit only to hve the size of the profit downgraded
after an accounting firm noticed some fudging of the numbers
this bank loan thing, ask your fellow oxygen bottle mate! he is the dweeb that keeps bring up the AFL loan up & financials! its only fair that it gets knock back with the NRLOL financial situation
But but but....AFLcrap1 wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 9:49 pmSelf own age at its bestleagueiscrap wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 9:33 pmthe annual report hasnt been released floggoAFLcrap1 wrote: Mon Sep 04, 2017 8:28 pmSo can you post evidence of the NRLfudging the books this year .
Off ya go Mr fabricator .
& why the fuck do you keep bringing BANK LOAN BANK loan into thread after thread .
You have already started 2 different threads about the BANK LOAN ..yet you still can't help ranting about it in threads that have nothing to do with it .
Get some new material
but their last years annual report was reported as a profit only to be found they had borrowred money!
the year before, or the one before that, they reported a profit only to hve the size of the profit downgraded
after an accounting firm noticed some fudging of the numbers
this bank loan thing, ask your fellow oxygen bottle mate! he is the dweeb that keeps bring up the AFL loan up & financials! its only fair that it gets knock back with the NRLOL financial situation
You state that the NRL has fudged the books THIS YEAR ..
Then when asked for proof you say this years report hasn't been released .
Lay off the metho