Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

again for the dummies

RL 132 Million
AR .. 120 Million

prove it

have

487 times

I havent seen one independant source for your claim.

Xman wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

Bullshit?

Oh yeah, of course, anything is BS when the AFL is shown to be number one.

AFL remains the code with the highest total number of viewers with 36.6% (estimated at 6.6 million) who will watch “Always” or “Occasionally.”

Source: Roy Morgan Research, July 2009 — June 2010, n=18,966.

Even the dumbest of the dumb should be able to work out those figures are flawed ...(maybe not Beaussie) The guy must think we were all born in Melbourne

The figures correctly reflect the domination AFL has over the NRL in most areas: crowds, memberships, revenue, media interest, TV rights....

132 Million
to 120 Million

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

prove it

have

487 times

I havent seen one independant source for your claim.

I've seen scores
TV stations are independant ....

here closeith the lesson

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

have

487 times

I havent seen one independant source for your claim.

I've seen scores
TV stations are independant ....

here closeith the lesson

post them then. Shouldnt be hard

TV stations are independant on what their claims on ratings are they?

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

I havent seen one independant source for your claim.

I've seen scores
TV stations are independant ....

here closeith the lesson

post them then. :

have 487 times
you lost this debate 39 times you've tried it on .... I'm not interested in winning it for the 40th time

I'm calling BS.

NSWAFL wrote:

Parra, I suggest you concentrate on the blue section. You forgot that the red section is "occasionally", which widens the scope well beyond TV ratings. I know that's where you were going, so stop it now.

Fuck the blue section, if we go on that criteria, why have Bea and Danny got AFL and Union internationals in Front of RL?

The RL internationals outside WC's flog union.

The AFL has one game last year rate over 300k on Pay TV while the NRL has started moving into the 400k already.

You wanna know why, it's because like AFL fans, Roy Morgan has never heard of REGIONALS.

Look at the blue section if you want the truth, imbecile. And Morgan doesn't care about regionals because the advertisers don't.

Anzac test for a start rated 1.8 million in 2009, the Bloody slow Union was under 1 million.

NSWAFL wrote:

Look at the blue section if you want the truth, imbecile. And Morgan doesn't care about regionals because the advertisers don't.

Yeah, that's why regional NSW and QLD is worth more than WA, SA, Vic, NT and Tas combined, dumbarse.

It's worth nothing to advertisers. They are only interested in the five capital cities.

Prove THAT!

Logic. The majority of the population in this country is in those five cities (reference White Pages). The majority of businesses in Australia are based in those five cities (reference Yellow Pages). What advertiser would go with the minority? A dumb one with no idea.

lol.