Talking Footy

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat May 27, 2017 7:24 pm

How fucking demented are you
Of course a ground that holds 90k will get a bigger crowd than a ground that hold 52

Seriously what the fuck is wrong with your brain .

I meant any SOO this year

NlolRL wrote: Sat May 27, 2017 6:44 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat May 27, 2017 6:38 pm

& at years end . More people in this country will have watched Rl than Fumbleball
No harm in running second ....again

thats if you believe accumulative ratings mean anything about popularity. Of course NRL fans do because they lose everything else

There you go again , retreating back into your own little fantasy world.

Perhaps you could explain why the NRL have made more revenue in the past 5 years than the AFL has in the past 6.? Mmh but but but - the little green men.







'

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat May 27, 2017 7:24 pm

How fucking demented are you
Of course a ground that holds 90k will get a bigger crowd than a ground that hold 52

Seriously what the fuck is wrong with your brain .

Soo apparently still has tickets for sale. Flicking over to 4bc Thursday the host was going on about how it wasn't sold out and was surprised by this.

Refresh my memory Fred, didn't SOO in Melbourne get a crowd larger than any other AFL club game, and 2nd only to that years Grand Final?

Maybe. If the Super Bowl was played on Melbourne I would guess it would be sold out. Hardly reflects popularity of the game.

Anyway .., what has a crowd in Melbourne got to do with my comment ?

pussycat wrote: Sat May 27, 2017 9:11 pm

NlolRL wrote: Sat May 27, 2017 6:44 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat May 27, 2017 6:38 pm

& at years end . More people in this country will have watched Rl than Fumbleball
No harm in running second ....again

thats if you believe accumulative ratings mean anything about popularity. Of course NRL fans do because they lose everything else

Perhaps you could explain why the NRL have made more revenue in the past 5 years than the AFL has in the past 6.?

Is this right ? AFL I thought had higher gate takings (obviously), sponsorship, membership etc etc . But I only thought that but if you have more information that says the nrl actually make more revenue than the AFL I would be really interested in seeing this.

pussycat wrote: Sat May 27, 2017 9:11 pm

NlolRL wrote: Sat May 27, 2017 6:44 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat May 27, 2017 6:38 pm

& at years end . More people in this country will have watched Rl than Fumbleball
No harm in running second ....again

thats if you believe accumulative ratings mean anything about popularity. Of course NRL fans do because they lose everything else

There you go again , retreating back into your own little fantasy world.

Perhaps you could explain why the NRL have made more revenue in the past 5 years than the AFL has in the past 6.? Mmh but but but - the little green men.







'

more revenue?

Look up your Annual report and we'll see if your still laughing?

I will look it up for you.


Since 2012 the NRL revenue has gone from (2012)185m To (2016) 391m adding 206m in revenue in 4 years.

Since 2011 AFL revenue has gone from (2011) 382m to (2016) 569m adding 187m in revenue in 5 years.

pussycat wrote: Sat May 27, 2017 10:10 pm

Look up your Annual report and we'll see if your still laughing?

I will look it up for you.


Since 2012 the NRL revenue has gone from (2012)185m To (2016) 391m adding 206m in revenue in 4 years.

Since 2011 AFL revenue has gone from (2011) 382m to (2016) 569m adding 187m in revenue in 5 years.

oh dear. How do those numbers show you made more revenue?? We are still nearly 200m ahead!

Sorry, our revenue has increased more.

Fred wrote: Sat May 27, 2017 9:47 pm

Maybe. If the Super Bowl was played on Melbourne I would guess it would be sold out. Hardly reflects popularity of the game.

Anyway .., what has a crowd in Melbourne got to do with my comment ?

Are you serious Fred. Are you trying to say a big crowd turning up to a game does not reflect it's popularity?

AFLs crowd at their game in China would have to be the most comical thing I ever seen.

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote: Sun May 28, 2017 7:30 am

Fred wrote: Sat May 27, 2017 9:47 pm

Maybe. If the Super Bowl was played on Melbourne I would guess it would be sold out. Hardly reflects popularity of the game.

Anyway .., what has a crowd in Melbourne got to do with my comment ?

Are you serious Fred. Are you trying to say a big crowd turning up to a game does not reflect it's popularity?

AFLs crowd at their game in China would have to be the most comical thing I ever seen.

Most notable thing about that China crowd was how fucking hungry 1000s of people were .

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun May 28, 2017 7:58 am

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote: Sun May 28, 2017 7:30 am

Fred wrote: Sat May 27, 2017 9:47 pm

Maybe. If the Super Bowl was played on Melbourne I would guess it would be sold out. Hardly reflects popularity of the game.

Anyway .., what has a crowd in Melbourne got to do with my comment ?

Are you serious Fred. Are you trying to say a big crowd turning up to a game does not reflect it's popularity?

AFLs crowd at their game in China would have to be the most comical thing I ever seen.

Most notable thing about that China crowd was how fucking hungry 1000s of people were .

Hehe I don't know why AFL is bothering with China. Ireland would be better for AFL to play exhibition games.

pussycat wrote: Sat May 27, 2017 11:13 pm

Sorry, our revenue has increased more.

from a far lower base. Not sure how think being THAT far behind is a win

NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote: Sun May 28, 2017 7:30 am

Fred wrote: Sat May 27, 2017 9:47 pm

Maybe. If the Super Bowl was played on Melbourne I would guess it would be sold out. Hardly reflects popularity of the game.

Anyway .., what has a crowd in Melbourne got to do with my comment ?

Are you serious Fred. Are you trying to say a big crowd turning up to a game does not reflect it's popularity?

AFLs crowd at their game in China would have to be the most comical thing I ever seen.

With images like below being a regular occurrence in the NRL youre either blind or trolling