Page 6 of 6
Re: AFL Womens league: 3 hours old and already more national than the NRL
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2017 7:27 am
by Swans4ever
leeroy*NRL* wrote: Tue Jun 21, 2016 10:32 am
Xman wrote:you seem obsessed with international validation. Maybe its because its one of the only things RL has going for it when comparing to the AFL.
Insignificant international growth certainly doesnt seem to bother the NFL. They know theyre one of the worlds most popular sports without it
NFL has had a number of games into London per year
and there are talks of team being there..
a Big difference when the size of the USA is 340million people
and is the only football code that really matters
when comparing that to 10million people in VIC SA AND WA and tassie.
its quite small.
Thats why the growth of AFL OS is even more impressive
Re: AFL Womens league: 3 hours old and already more national than the NRL
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2017 10:13 am
by AFLcrap1
Swans4ever wrote: Sat Feb 18, 2017 7:24 am
AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Jun 18, 2016 4:34 pm
Swans4ever wrote:
By all means post the real figures! It's great how you blindly believe anything from RL HQ yet dispute everything from AFL. You are a sad little man
Lol you already back-pedalled in that thread & tried to claim that 69 k was the national figure .
& can you show where I believe anything from RL HQ .
Face facts
Aflol has been caught out plenty of times bullshitting about numbers
Sadly moronic brain deads such as yourself lap it up .
So the person who's quick to call others liars is now refusing to show the correct figures - I call BS on your post until you show your ource. That makes you a hypocrite and a liar!
We don't know the correct figures .
But figures released from AFL house have been shown over & over to be bullshit .
Go read the Lawson report
He explained how they do it .
When fumble house actually release real registered player numbers in real comps then they will be believed .
Until then
They have a track record of lying .
Re: AFL Womens league: 3 hours old and already more national than the NRL
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2017 12:18 pm
by leagueiscrap
AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Feb 18, 2017 10:13 am
Swans4ever wrote: Sat Feb 18, 2017 7:24 am
AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Jun 18, 2016 4:34 pm
Lol you already back-pedalled in that thread & tried to claim that 69 k was the national figure .
& can you show where I believe anything from RL HQ .
Face facts
Aflol has been caught out plenty of times bullshitting about numbers
Sadly moronic brain deads such as yourself lap it up .
So the person who's quick to call others liars is now refusing to show the correct figures - I call BS on your post until you show your ource. That makes you a hypocrite and a liar!
We don't know the correct figures .
But figures released from AFL house have been shown over & over to be bullshit .
Go read the Lawson report
He explained how they do it .
When fumble house actually release real registered player numbers in real comps then they will be believed .
Until then
They have a track record of lying .
Lol still choosing to ignore all of the other several reports, like erass, abs, Roy Morgan plus several news paper reports, but just keep rambling on with your own conspiracies
Re: AFL Womens league: 3 hours old and already more national than the NRL
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2017 1:40 pm
by AFLcrap1
Go away idiot .
On what planet is a SURVEY a true indication of registered player numbers .
Re: AFL Womens league: 3 hours old and already more national than the NRL
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2017 3:38 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Especially when all those freaking surveys are done in viccoland. I mean, how out of touch with life and reality can you be to live you life around what happens in a football code?
Dear God.
Re: AFL Womens league: 3 hours old and already more national than the NRL
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2017 7:51 pm
by Swans4ever
AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Feb 18, 2017 10:13 am
Swans4ever wrote: Sat Feb 18, 2017 7:24 am
AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Jun 18, 2016 4:34 pm
Lol you already back-pedalled in that thread & tried to claim that 69 k was the national figure .
& can you show where I believe anything from RL HQ .
Face facts
Aflol has been caught out plenty of times bullshitting about numbers
Sadly moronic brain deads such as yourself lap it up .
So the person who's quick to call others liars is now refusing to show the correct figures - I call BS on your post until you show your ource. That makes you a hypocrite and a liar!
We don't know the correct figures .
But figures released from AFL house have been shown over & over to be bullshit .
Go read the Lawson report
He explained how they do it .
When fumble house actually release real registered player numbers in real comps then they will be believed .
Until then
They have a track record of lying .
Maybe we should start calling you Donald Trump. You have been caught out again your a hypocrite and a liar, now you can comeback with your usual BS.
Re: AFL Womens league: 3 hours old and already more national than the NRL
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2017 8:44 pm
by AFLcrap1
Ok point out where I have lied .
Off ya go
I can post plenty of yours MR COLA
Re: AFL Womens league: 3 hours old and already more national than the NRL
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2017 10:23 pm
by AFLcrap1
Lol
Ya reckon
I havnt seen any change in the figures released by AFL house .
It's always PARTICIPATION ....not actual registered club players in regular comps .
Just like Lawson said to mask low club numbers .
Re: AFL Womens league: 3 hours old and already more national than the NRL
Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2017 12:07 am
by AFLcrap1
& why are those numbers never quoted in the AFL media .
It's always PARTICIPATION .
Just look at the 86 k females in NSW
Lol
That got the giggles .
Why don't they say there are .......... Female players in actual registered comps .
The truth shall set you fumblers free
If you let it