Talking Footy

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Stop deflecting .
Post proof of what you claim or fuck off .

my claim is backed up by the video and several news articles

Not one article backs your crap up .

leagueiscrap wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Not one article backs your crap up .

denial is the first step way to #######

Lol so you can't win an argument & resort to your old stalking ways .
Posting personal info is against the rules .
You know that .but you have nothing else .

Good work dumbo .

You admit defeat .
Maybe on your time away from here you can get help
The first step is admitting you have a problem

AFLcrap1 wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Not one article backs your crap up .

denial is the first step way to #######

Lol so you can't win an argument & resort to your old stalking ways .
Posting personal info is against the rules .
You know that .but you have nothing else .

Good work dumbo .

You admit defeat .
Maybe on your time away from here you can get help
The first step is admitting you have a problem

you really struggle to come up with your own ideas dont you fuckstick spazza!
considering you've never won an argument or posted anything constructive in your whole time on TF, funny thing is spazza your accusing me of stalking, then why is it you reply moments later to most of my posts

so first of all you tell every one your name,then you accuse two people of giving out your name and have them banned who magically just know it, then you try and deny its your name, now throwing down ****** threats of me using your name that is apparently not it

your a little inconsistent with your lies! so for a flog to just cry lies lies to everything he doesn't want to believe & accuse every one else of being liars fuckstick you haven't got a leg to stand on

now back to the topic of discussion. pearce's intentions were clear from this picture

Never ever posted my name on here .

You continually accuse me of that yet never ever post where I have .
..common theme with you .

& the only people banned were the stalkers who posted my name .
Just like you have done & did again today .



If you can't win an argument & have to resort to posting personal info then you've lost .

If people are banned its their own fault for not following the rules .


You seem to have a problem with that .

Get your carer to explain it slowly .

& I've won nearly all arguments against you .
You post a lie .
I ask for proof
You can't post proof .
You lost .

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Never ever posted my name on here .

You continually accuse me of that yet never ever post where I have .
..common theme with you .

& the only people banned were the stalkers who posted my name .
Just like you have done & did again today .



If you can't win an argument & have to resort to posting personal info then you've lost .

If people are banned its their own fault for not following the rules .


You seem to have a problem with that .

Get your carer to explain it slowly .

& I've won nearly all arguments against you .
You post a lie .
I ask for proof
You can't post proof .
You lost .

wow how did you just magically know that i was logged in and made a few posts stalker! fuckstick it happens far to regularly for it to be a coincidence yet accuse others of stalking >


you posted your name on here when you first joined the forum spazza. then accuse others of leaking information. its funny because you are first to use others names then have a cry about others using your real name, its funny how you cant even keep that lie straight

lol you have never won any argument against me, because every time you engage in an argument doesn't matter who its against they just turn in to mental rants, deflecting & coping and past random quotes, anything to have your way

Posting a reply on a forum is not stalking .
Are you for real .
Lol

Seeking personal info & posting that IS STALKING .
You're guilty .
You sad pathetic little man

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Posting a reply on a forum is not stalking .
Are you for real .
Lol

Seeking personal info & posting that IS STALKING .
You're guilty .
You sad pathetic little man

Moments after the post is made, not just on the odd occasion just the last year. Troll

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Posting a reply on a forum is not stalking .
Are you for real .
Lol

Seeking personal info & posting that IS STALKING .
You're guilty .
You sad pathetic little man

Err no perhaps you should loo up the definition of something before you accused people - 1st there must be a course of conduct designed to cause fear or apprehension and as a result of that course it does so. You are such an idiot!

Lol .
stalk2
stɔːk/
verb
gerund or present participle: stalking
1.
pursue or approach stealthily.
"a cat stalking a bird"
synonyms: creep up on, trail, follow, shadow, track down, go after, be after, dog, hound, course, hunt, pursue, chase, give chase to, run after; informaltail


I believe the fumblers spent quite a bit of time ....tracking down my info .
To then post it on here is against the rules .
& why the fuck does anyone want to .
know anything personal about another poster

But you wouldn't have a problem with that swines .

Unless someone started posting your info .
Then you'd sequel like a bitch

Your too important .
If only we knew who you were

a news update on the attempted dog rooter

The Sydney Roosters have sought legal advice about suing those responsible for the now-infamous video of embattled co-captain Mitchell Pearce, in a move that could help test the limits of privacy law in Australia.
The footage, taken on a mobile phone and showing a drunken Pearce simulating a sex act with a dog, caused a furore after it was sold to media outlets including Channel Nine and The Daily Telegraph.


earce left the country on January 29 to enter an undisclosed rehabilitation clinic. He is expected to be stripped of the captaincy, suspended for about half the NRL season and fined a substantial sum.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/sydn ... z41GW6GUXd
Follow us: @smh on Twitter | sydneymorningherald on Facebook

Mitchell Pearce has left the country to enter an undisclosed rehabilitation clinic, his NRL club has confirmed on Friday night.
"The Sydney Roosters can confirm that Mitchell Pearce will be receiving treatment in an intensive rehabilitation facility for an extended period," according to a statement posted on the club's website on Friday evening.
Mitchell Pearce after speaking at a press conference in Surry Hills on Friday with his sister Tatum and mother Terri.
Mitchell Pearce after speaking at a press conference in Surry Hills on Friday with his sister Tatum and mother Terri. Photo: Kate Geraghty
"Pearce has tonight departed for the overseas facility with his mother, Terri.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... z41GWdrGP4
Follow us: @smh on Twitter | sydneymorningherald on Facebook

good on him for people making him seek help for his bestiality fetish. the sponsor of the club steggles chicken, must be rather nerves after finding out this sickos fetish for animals. i doubt he will be invited to any sponsors events by a company that has anything to do with animal products

Still no proof of him trying to root a dog .

Call the police dumbo .
You seem to have evidence they don't

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol .
stalk2
stɔːk/
verb
gerund or present participle: stalking
1.
pursue or approach stealthily.
"a cat stalking a bird"
synonyms: creep up on, trail, follow, shadow, track down, go after, be after, dog, hound, course, hunt, pursue, chase, give chase to, run after; informaltail


I believe the fumblers spent quite a bit of time ....tracking down my info .
To then post it on here is against the rules .
& why the fuck does anyone want to .
know anything personal about another poster

But you wouldn't have a problem with that swines .

Unless someone started posting your info .
Then you'd sequel like a bitch

Your too important .
If only we knew who you were

But you raving lunatic you used it in the LEGAL sense which is as I defined - what a nuphy!

Let me explain it for you .

I'm called a stalker for replying on a fight club forum .

That's not stalking .

Understand

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Let me explain it for you .

I'm called a stalker for replying on a fight club forum .

That's not stalking .

Understand

??????????
Please try and make sense