Talking Footy

AFLsforPussies wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLsforPussies wrote:

Yeah not much you can do with a sport that is only really popular at the bottom half of a nation and nowhere else.

the NRL is locked in 2 Australian states, but this is the perfect recipe for a traditional rivalry because there can only be this matchup. The AFLs issue is its popular in 4 states and has a number of stars from the other 2. Therefore there is no traditional rival

NRL locked in two states??

So I suppose the Auckland Warriors, Canberra Raiders and Melbourne Storm are in NSW or Qld are they?? =D> =D>

There are plenty of English, Fijian and New Zealand players that are NRL stars and are ineligible to play Origin.. So that arguement does not really add up.

yes two states.for all the crap you give the swans (the largest team in NSW) & the lions (been a basket case for a decades and still getting better numbers than nearly all the clubs in NSW) the raiders are a joke and so are the storm.
there has been 5 players in history from Victoria to play in the NRLOL!
ps when i went to Auckland last year it was in NZ not Australia

Lol .
Can you show me what state Melb is in .
What state is Canberra in .
You keep claiming this ,2 state crap ,which is wrong.
You are do demented it's not funny l

Yeah according to Mr Essendon, Canberra, Melbourne and Auckland are part of Qld and NSW lol..

I bet the screw loose thinks the Leeds Rhinos are in Queensland too.

leagueiscrap wrote:

AFLsforPussies wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLsforPussies wrote:

Yeah not much you can do with a sport that is only really popular at the bottom half of a nation and nowhere else.

the NRL is locked in 2 Australian states, but this is the perfect recipe for a traditional rivalry because there can only be this matchup. The AFLs issue is its popular in 4 states and has a number of stars from the other 2. Therefore there is no traditional rival

NRL locked in two states??

So I suppose the Auckland Warriors, Canberra Raiders and Melbourne Storm are in NSW or Qld are they?? =D> =D>

There are plenty of English, Fijian and New Zealand players that are NRL stars and are ineligible to play Origin.. So that arguement does not really add up.

yes two states.for all the crap you give the swans (the largest team in NSW) & the lions (been a basket case for a decades and still getting better numbers than nearly all the clubs in NSW) the raiders are a joke and so are the storm.
there has been 5 players in history from Victoria to play in the NRLOL!
ps when i went to Auckland last year it was in NZ not Australia

NURSE....NURSE!!!!

Xman wrote:

leeroy*NRL* wrote:

Xman wrote:

Other than SOO the NRL gets flogged. It won the GF for the first time in years and only really because of a sentimental favorite winning. The finals and home and away games were dominated in crowds and ratings by the AFL. The NRL is actively trying to grow its crowds but actually went down from a dismal 16k

LOL

the Only reason the AFL even gets close,
Is because each game is shown on FTA in there own States..
for example.

Adelaide crows v West Cast, Shown live into SA and WA then on Fox Sports for the rest of the country..
this happens with every game of AFL.

I will add the extra game you have a week as well.

You have 4 FTA min a Week on FTA into each State..
plus the rest played on FOX SPORTS MAXING the Tv viewers to the LIMIT

THE NRL has 3 FTA GAMES 2 live 1 delayed. and 5 games on fox sports.

how we even come close is amazing.!!!!!!!

if both codes were to put 8 games a week on FTA live around the country
THE NRL would win EASILY!

utter rubbish. What you dot realise is only 1 AFL game a weekend is shown in isolation (Friday night), the other 8 are all shown against another AFL game. The end result is all AFL fans can only realistically watch 5-6 games a weekend, not 9. Therefore in reality the NRL has 25 rounds of 8 games a weekend and the AFL only 22 rounds of 5-6 viewable games a weekend.

So the NRL should be well ahead but actually lose :_<>

Yes Agreed
though you have so many FTA games.
of the home teams on FTA.
therefore Getting Big numbers towards these games.

yes you may have 2 games at the same time
but for example this is how it usually it is.
Like yesterday.
St Kilda v Essendon live into Melbourne.
Port v Crows live in to Adelaide.
therefore getting MAX Viewers In Melbourne FTA and Max viewers in Adelaide.
this is also done in PERTH BRISBANE AND SYDNEY>

The NRL only ever does this in one game on Friday night.
and its not always 2 games, sometimes the once.

The NRL have 5 games on FOX SPORTS>
therefore limiting the Ratings.

and somehow the NRL is still up there.

The NRL is up there because of 8 games on the weekend fans can usually watch all 8 which only amounts to 16 hours. Where as I can only watch 5-6 AFL games because I cannot watch 2 at the same time, and my 5 matches would be 15 hours of viewing. And after weve essentially watched the same amount of football each you are counted as 8 watched games and me 5.

Its just not equitable

Umm .
Fri & Mon are weekdays .
Not the weekend .

DOH .

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Umm .
Fri & Mon are weekdays .
Not the weekend .

DOH .

yeah, that makes a difference

Just correcting another Aflol fan mistake.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Just correcting another Aflol fan mistake.

an irrelevant point none the less

Really .
You claimed all NRL games are on the weekend .
They're not .

Xman wrote:

The NRL is up there because of 8 games on the weekend fans can usually watch all 8 which only amounts to 16 hours. Where as I can only watch 5-6 AFL games because I cannot watch 2 at the same time, and my 5 matches would be 15 hours of viewing. And after weve essentially watched the same amount of football each you are counted as 8 watched games and me 5.

Its just not equitable

lmfao..... =D> =D> =D>

Oh my days, you never fail to make my days Xbutbutbut............ :_<> :_<> :_<>


Its took you hours to come up with that Theory and it took AFLcrap 5 seconds to shut you down..the intel gap between Xman and AFLcrap is glaring for everyone to see...

Xman wrote:

The NRL is up there because of 8 games on the weekend fans can usually watch all 8 which only amounts to 16 hours. Where as I can only watch 5-6 AFL games because I cannot watch 2 at the same time, and my 5 matches would be 15 hours of viewing. And after weve essentially watched the same amount of football each you are counted as 8 watched games and me 5.

Its just not equitable

Whats your but but excuse for most Fri nights?

How does your but, but excuse about a prime time GF look now?

Faces it XMan - Your full of shit? do you think GWS would even 80k, or whatever it was, if the other teams half and Quarter time breaks didnt coincide with there matches.

you dont only show each of your games into their Home market, you add them together - and still come up with a shit number :_<> :_<> :_<>

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Really .
You claimed all NRL games are on the weekend .
They're not .

OK, the weekend, 1 even prior, and 1 day after. None of which contradicts my point of the NRL showing almost all their games in isolation. Thanks

eelofwest wrote:

Xman wrote:

The NRL is up there because of 8 games on the weekend fans can usually watch all 8 which only amounts to 16 hours. Where as I can only watch 5-6 AFL games because I cannot watch 2 at the same time, and my 5 matches would be 15 hours of viewing. And after weve essentially watched the same amount of football each you are counted as 8 watched games and me 5.

Its just not equitable

lmfao..... =D> =D> =D>

Oh my days, you never fail to make my days Xbutbutbut............ :_<> :_<> :_<>


Its took you hours to come up with that Theory and it took AFLcrap 5 seconds to shut you down..the intel gap between Xman and AFLcrap is glaring for everyone to see...

lol how does that in any way shut down my theory? :_<>