Talking Footy

Posted: **Fri Feb 06, 2015 8:55 am**

leeroy*NRL* wrote:
Fox Sports only ever invested in the A league
Because it would fill there schedule / summer with some sport...

at a very low budget way of doing it...

get a few bucks on the side...

strange then that they decided to re-invest and then re-invest again with the FFA Cup which isn't a summer sport. Whoops there goes that theory.

Posted: **Fri Feb 06, 2015 9:46 am**

post_hoc wrote:
leeroy*NRL* wrote:
Fox Sports only ever invested in the A league
Because it would fill there schedule / summer with some sport...

at a very low budget way of doing it...

get a few bucks on the side...
strange then that they decided to re-invest and then re-invest again with the FFA Cup which isn't a summer sport. Whoops there goes that theory.

It Started in August and finished in Dec.
There was lucky to be a live game a week and it was mid week Tuesday or Wednesday as I recall..

just filling some spots... it barly rated bar the final... which was pretty pathetic...ratings wise.

Posted: **Fri Feb 06, 2015 9:58 am**

Was doc McStuffin on .
Or the Antiques Roadshow.

They really smash the Sokka ratings.

Posted: **Fri Feb 06, 2015 11:08 am**

I believe the competition starts in May or April, so nice try

Round of 32 starts in July

So again the point is clearly you were wrong

Posted: **Fri Feb 06, 2015 11:10 am**

So no comments on the EPL TV deal vs the NRL?

So clearly as this deal is worth way more than 4 times the NRL deal, under the NRL fan boys reasoning that means the NRL is an amatuer comp.

Posted: **Fri Feb 06, 2015 11:53 am**

post_hoc wrote:
I believe the competition starts in May or April, so nice try

Round of 32 starts in July

So again the point is clearly you were wrong

Ok point taken.. on TV it starts July 29

But no one even cares about the rounds after round 32
let alone before rd 32

how many games did they show live out of the hundreds that were played ?

Posted: **Fri Feb 06, 2015 2:22 pm**

I believe 10, that was what the deal was for

Posted: **Fri Feb 06, 2015 2:42 pm**

post_hoc wrote:
I believe 10, that was what the deal was for

Well 10 is pathetic...

hey Post_hoc

who did you go for before the WSW...????

Posted: **Fri Feb 06, 2015 2:55 pm**

post_hoc wrote:
So no comments on the EPL TV deal vs the NRL?

So clearly as this deal is worth way more than 4 times the NRL deal, under the NRL fan boys reasoning that means the NRL is an amatuer comp.

Got a link for any of this or is it crap as usual?

Posted: **Fri Feb 06, 2015 6:56 pm**

post_hoc wrote:
AFLsforPussies wrote:
sydneyfc wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
sydneyfc wrote:
Yet AFL have 2 teams in Sydney, 1 in Brisbane while the NRL have 1 leaking money in Melbourne and none in WA or SA
there'll be one in WA in 2018
the West Coast Pirates
there to run the Western Farce & the Perth Gloryholes outta town you gibbering tosser

the VFL have 1 team in Sydney that can't outrate the telle tubbies on TV there
the other is the most irrelevant professional sporting franchise in the nation

their team in Brisbane
are
20 million in debt & getting further in debt each year

anything else you need to be corrected on you lying piss flap

Both your sport s are shit. My sport has nearly 1000 pro leagues world wide and the AFL's 1 league is better than both of yours.

The super league is as low as darts and league 2 in the UK. What's the avg attendance again? 7,000? Lmfao
If AFLs number 1 league is better than NRLs. Why did
RUGBY LEAGUE GRAND FINAL
STATE OF ORIGIN 1
STATE OF ORIGIN 2
all smash the AFL grandfinal in the TV rating???

The EPL has been the biggest comp in the UK as long as anyone can remember. That will never change. The fact that Superleagues broadcast is worth nearly 4 times the amount of your A league says it has much more value in viewership than your little down under amatuer league.

If the A league had any real commercial value, a free to air commercial network would play money for it. And that is simply not happening.
by your reasoning then, the NRL should have the same value as the EPL. After all you claim the NRL is the dominant sport here.

So let's do the sums

EPL $4.67 Billion over 3 years
NRL $1.02 billion over 5 years.

LOL the EPL's annual TV rights is more than than the NRL's 5 year rights.

Fuck that makes you guys look bad.

The EPL beats every sport in the UK clown. It always has and always will. Beats probably every other UK code put together.

Like I said, the EPL would probably have more of a following here than your Amateur league which can't even get on a commercial network.

Then you just have to laugh at your other sport AFL. AFL can't even get a foot hold in the UK and is unknown to most.

Posted: **Fri Feb 06, 2015 11:30 pm**

ParraEelsNRL wrote:
post_hoc wrote:
So no comments on the EPL TV deal vs the NRL?

So clearly as this deal is worth way more than 4 times the NRL deal, under the NRL fan boys reasoning that means the NRL is an amatuer comp.
Got a link for any of this or is it crap as usual?

Google it EPL TV rights, I think first one is a foxsports article

Posted: **Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:32 am**

No, you stated something, you prove it.

you said 4 times what the NRL got, prove it.

Posted: **Sat Feb 07, 2015 8:58 am**

He won't parra .
The Sokka & Aflol boys( excluding Wookie) continually make claims ,without any source .

Talking Footy

the Gummy Sharks back at school

Re: the Gummy Sharks back at school

Re: the Gummy Sharks back at school

Re: the Gummy Sharks back at school

Re: the Gummy Sharks back at school

Re: the Gummy Sharks back at school

Re: the Gummy Sharks back at school

Re: the Gummy Sharks back at school

Re: the Gummy Sharks back at school

Re: the Gummy Sharks back at school

Re: the Gummy Sharks back at school

Re: the Gummy Sharks back at school

Re: the Gummy Sharks back at school

Re: the Gummy Sharks back at school