Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

The NRL will add teams in 2018 in Perth & Brisbane on the back of a 1.6 billion dollar media rights deal
The ARLC will have revenues of 500 million a year
Average crowds will reach 20, 000
Memberships will be at 400, 000
The ARLC will bank close to 100 million in profits in 2018 alone

The club grant will reach 10 million per club
More then most LOL clubs total revenue :_<>

The NRL will be near unstopable over the next 20 years

cow jump over moon.jpg

the NRL need to stop the crowd figures & tv ratings from going backwards first

VFL
37K average crowd in 2010
32K in 2014

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

VFL
123 million on TV in 2010 with 88 games on FTA & 88 on pay tv
&
123 Million on TV in 2013 with 88 games on FTA & 198 on pay tv ....



:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

but yeah
its the NRL that needs to stop crowds & TV ratings from going backwards :_<> :_<>


oh dumbo
don't ever change son
don't ever change

NRL 2010 16406
NRL 2014 15905
no expansion
TV ratings
FOR the second year running, the NRL has suffered a major ratings hit with TV audiences down by another 3.6 million across Australia and New Zealand in 2014.

The NRL has also failed to reach its crowd target of 16,500 for this season, recording a 15,900 average that was almost identical to last year’s attendance result.

The Daily Telegraph yesterday obtained the final TV ratings figures for the 26-round regular season, which reveal significant drops for all three official broadcasters — Channel Nine, Fox Sports, and Sky New Zealand.


http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 7054536927

Foolproof wrote:

There is every chance.

But but >


Pokes
Pokes
Pokes


:_<>

Raiderdave wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

A loss in the CWC, oh well 1 more game and then back to the A League. What a run.

Interesting statistic as well the CWC is the pinnacle for 7 teams. It started with 310,000 teams, so not a bad effort for the Wanderers, 5th or 6th out of 310,000 teams.

Champions of Asia, world domination is going to have to wait

5th or 6th



:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>


they play in a league ranked 99th in the World
they wouldn't be ranked 265th you dribbling wanker

Yet they are going to be 5th of 6th you fucking midget

You can't comprehend can you, it must suck following a nothing sport like yours

post_hoc wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

post_hoc wrote:

A loss in the CWC, oh well 1 more game and then back to the A League. What a run.

Interesting statistic as well the CWC is the pinnacle for 7 teams. It started with 310,000 teams, so not a bad effort for the Wanderers, 5th or 6th out of 310,000 teams.

Champions of Asia, world domination is going to have to wait

5th or 6th



:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>


they play in a league ranked 99th in the World
they wouldn't be ranked 265th you dribbling wanker

Yet they are going to be 5th of 6th you fucking midget

You can't comprehend can you, it must suck following a nothing sport like yours

Yet
They are actually ranked ... 265th
You dopey fucktard

Fuck off you midget, no evidence. Raiderdave the dumbest person on this site.

Poor raiders the best they can hope for is strip to NZ. Raiders, Pathetic excuse of a Team in a pathetic excuse of a game

LOL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3HXBOSrhZM

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

LOL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3HXBOSrhZM

Bump for Porkless pig.

your point?

post_hoc wrote:

your point?

You said

Post-Lies wrote:

Poor raiders the best they can hope for is strip to NZ

I put in a link to a game being played in England between the Canberra Raiders of Australia and the Widnes Vikings (Chemics) of England, thus your post was a lie even before you opened your stupid ignorant trap about the Raiders never playing anywhere outside of Australia bar their annual Trip to New Zealand.

And you couldn't even spell trip right.

Lol poor old porky .
Caught telling porkies. Again .

Sokkas irrelevance in this country has him frothing .

porky porky porky where are you?

You guys don't have a fucking clue, I have never met so many people in one place that can not get past a literal translation of a comment. Every fucking time you only look at the literal, you can't seem to grasp the notion of degrees.

I don't want to pick on people with development issues, but you lot remind me of people with autism, they have trouble comprehending subtle meanings of words or phrases.

I am left continually bewilded by your inability. Either that or you understand it but choose to ignore it.

Yeh
If I was you I'd go smash some seats .
That'll show them .

Wookie,

1) fuck off
2) it should have been inabilities so no disability was not correct
3) looking forward to you correcting everyone's spelling or are you just being a fuck wit ( and no I really do not believe you are fucking someone's humour but fuck wit is a common saying)
4) I count 5 sentences, you are going to have to be more specific.

So wookie once again you seem to institute a dangerous precedent, are you now going to correct everyone's spelling or is it only a lucky few newcomers that can look forward to it?

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Yeh
If I was you I'd go smash some seats .
That'll show them .

Don't you have some women to best up on?