Question on Styles

[post_hoc]

wow, you really have issues when shown to be bullshitting don't you. again I need to ask KE this time without the deflecting, why were you lying on this thread? Clearly you tried to claim something that is evidently not strue, I even posted it in bold for you. So KE why did you lie?

[King-Eliagh]

you bolded the defence bit. I already answered that point pages ago and you accepted my answer snotfobrains

And...you still didn't actually point out how or where I lied! He's totally over the hill folks, completely adrift, off tha chain crazy mad, he's.... .... loco

lets discuss further when you can point to where I was lying. Till then its....

... ... * insert the noises of crickets chirping folks. This old chump doesn't know what he's talking about

'styles'

[King-Eliagh]

you bolded the defence bit. I already answered that point pages ago and you accepted my answer snotfobrains

And...you still didn't actually point out how or where I lied! He's totally over the hill folks, completely adrift, off tha chain crazy mad, he's.... .... loco

lets discuss further when you can point to where I was lying. Till then its....

... ... * insert the noises of crickets chirping folks. This old chump doesn't know what he's talking about

'styles'

[post_hoc]

For feck sake you are thick, I did NOT BOLD THE DEFENCE BIT tika-taka is not defence, counter attack is not defence, Jesus you are stupid.

They are STYLES of play.

So again I asked why did you lie cmon KE explain why you droped out half my posts anc laimed I didn't talk about styles I only spoke about structures.

So why oh why KE do you lie? I think the board deserves to know why you lie?

[King-Eliagh]

Listen bro, get yer head sorted out then come back to me ok.

442 aint a style bro, its a structure

Quote where I lied too. Dropping out half a post is not a lie you dingbat! And for your poor brain i'll explain again. I'd already addressed the second half of your post and you'd accepted that and asked for us to show RL attacking styles of play. Numerous members gave you some, you struggled to understand. Then I realised you were talking about structures of attack not styles in your op and in your lamo defense against the RL supporters who'd provided you with attacking styles.

Listen 'styles' you've been resoundingly thumped in thread, from start to finish, pillar to post! Just snotted. My suggestion? Buy yourself some lamingtons, have a chamomile tea, invite some sooker wimps over and have a good ol cry/break chairs about it. Then come back to us when ur better again

[post_hoc]

KE_liar, you apologised yet for lying on here?

[King-Eliagh]

You pointed out where ive lied on here yet???

You are the lamest debater ive encountered. Its like conversing with an 8 year old. "Liar...you're a liar....you lied" without any ability to explain what the lie was or the context of the lie. Pathetic postlabotomy 'style' of posting.

Pickup yer game posthoc.

Meanwhile to the contrary of the above, ive thoroughly enjoyed this thread. Posthoc has been dealt an absolute shellacking, a whooping of Muhammad ali vs Cleveland big cat Williams proportions

[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oD99VbFzqAg[/video]

You've not been able to lay one shot on us in this entire thread postlabotomy. Someone! Wookie! Stop the fight and lock this one up already!

[post_hoc]

KE_Liar, I have pointed it out to you a number of times, the fact that you seem to have trouble reading is a matter you might need to take up with an adult literacy help service. You tried to quote I said something, and then 'failed' to include the next paragraph, so KE_liar, when will you apologise to the board for lying

[post_hoc]

KE_liar, rather sad that you keep trying to claim yourself as a winner, it makes you come across as a little desperate, I suppose I should be grateful that you don't appear to be obsessed with my nipples, but given time I guess you will.

clearly with your last 'post' you do find topless men somehow arousing, like I said before, I don't think this is the forum you should be bringing that into, I am certain that you can find other forums more into that. btw I am not judging you, like I said before your sexuality isn't my concern, each to their own, but your obsession with guys nipples on this forum is a bit suspect, I think you need to take it elsewhere

[King-Eliagh]

no you haven't pointed out any such thing you lying child. I quoted and commented on an aspect of your post. This is not a lie, nor is it against forum, intellectual or general societal guidelines you stoopid dipshit

Seriously, you got nuttin here. Move on chump and Pickup yer game

And a one off comment about behaviour on snapchat cannot be considered an obsession. Just another misuse of terminology from you. Me pointing that out is another win for me.

Absolutely snottin this sooker wimp here. Someone! throw in the fukkin towel!

[post_hoc]

KE_Liar, why didn't you post the whole quote? Why did you 'extract' a part form it, so yes you lied, it has been shown, how sad that you keep trying to claim you won lol.

as for snap chat, im just finding a lot of your posts seem to involved male nipples, and now in another post you appear to want to straddled me, it is a little weird honestly. Like I said, your sexuality is no one else business and you should be free to express it but I'm not into it and you need to take this side of you elsewhere, this is about sport

[King-Eliagh]

Uggghh this is really braindead stuff now.

I already answered this question.

I quoted half of your original quote because I wanted to address one of the points you made. I only wanted to address one of the points you made because I had already addressed the other points you had made in said post earlier in the thread. Comprehende?

Seriously you've got nuttin And all the members are witness to it. I'd stay on the stool and not come out for another round bro. It's getting embarrassing.

[post_hoc]

KE_liar, so you just admitted to not posting the whole things because you "I quoted half of your original quote because I wanted to address one of the points you made"

So you admit to selectively quoting to address only 1 point, ignoring the others, in that selective quote you claim I didn't talk about styles, when in fact I did.

again trying to declare yourself a winner, I think you seem to have a real need for this 'winning' bit is there a deeper psychological problem you have this need to declare to others that you have 'won' are other parts of your life such a mess? I see this all the time in the coaching I do, people coaching a kids sports team that 'need to win at all cost' they seem to feel great achievement that their u7 team beat another u7 team, not by playing correctly but needing to win, their lives outside of coaching must be rather sad.

So this need to declare yourself a winner by lying on the board, where does it come from? KE_liar, we can't help you unless you want to help yourself.

[King-Eliagh]

You talked about structure ya goon.

I win :D

some homework for ya though. Re-read entire thread and have a laugh at yourself It'll be good for yer soul.

[post_hoc]

KE_liar, I know what i said, and that is how easy it was to expose you for lying such as you did. So I am very happy that you admitted to only posting a part of my original post, so far so good, has taken you a while to admit you lied, now how long before you say sorry to the board?

c'mon KE_liar, say sorry for lying, or is it going to take to page 12 before you say sorry for the lie you recently admitted.