Page 6 of 6
Re: 2014 Rugby League Four Nations
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 11:51 am
by ParraEelsNRL
AFLcrap1 wrote:Yes he is using a 10 yr old investigation that went nowhere as proof that NRL players gang rape.
There is no proof ,if there was there would be a massive court case,convictions etc.
Where is your proof.you claimed they did it ,yet there is no proof.
You keep getting shown up as full of shit,.
When you can post something with a source get back to me
Yeah but the idiot forgets that since his code is global, any moron could flood these forums day and night with all the crap the sokka lot have gone on with over the years.
The Internet would explode if all the details were downloaded.
Re: 2014 Rugby League Four Nations
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 12:21 pm
by post_hoc
ParraEelsNRL wrote:post_hoc wrote:AFLcrap1 wrote:Lol.
You get caught out continually.
Please post proof or GTFO.
Dumb hooligan .
Clearly you have a poor memory of what happened, I will post 'evidence' backing it up, just so you stfu demanding things, I suspect you will keep going and going, because as I have shown with the 104,000 it doesn't matter what facts are presented if you don't like them you just demand more and more, so here goes
DET CHIEF INSP JASON BRETON: The police will work vigorously to protect the rights of the victim in this matter and that is really our key focus -- the victim of a very serious sexual assault. [this is the head of the task force investigating it]
REPORTER: Was there any evidence of rape, physically?
DET CHIEF INSP JASON BRETON: Yes.
MARK BANNERMAN: And just in case there was any room for confusion, Chief Inspector Breton answered that question again.
DET CHIEF INSP JASON BRETON: There was evidence consistent with her version as of the date of complaint -- that is, physical evidence consistent with her version.
The DPP chose not to prosecute, all the evidence points to rape occurring, the police even said so
Are you talking about the bulldogs set up?
LOL if you are, the cops knew nothing went on straight away, it was a media witch hunt and it seems only ******* let it sink into their tiny little brains.
So the part where the Detective leading the task force investigating it says
on the question was there any evidence of rape, in which he answers Yes, indicates that "the cops knew nothing went on straight away"
wow you really have a sick view, the fact you think it was a set up really gives a bad impression, so you are accusing the women who made the claim a liar, pretty sick.
Re: 2014 Rugby League Four Nations
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 1:36 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
How about the part where they said straight away there was nothing in it?
Re: 2014 Rugby League Four Nations
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 1:40 pm
by post_hoc
who said? The accused? The Club?
The police said there was something in it, so much so they built the case and took it to the DPP who chose not to prosecute.
So exactly where did the police say there "was nothing in it"?
Re: 2014 Rugby League Four Nations
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 2:14 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
The police said after it was all done they knew from the start there was nothing in it.
Ffs, most of us posters here have been posting at sites for years, over a decade and we have all posted in those threads AT THE TIME.
Re: 2014 Rugby League Four Nations
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 2:25 pm
by post_hoc
evidence?
Re: 2014 Rugby League Four Nations
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2014 10:32 am
by AFLsforPussies
Yeah how did four nations turn into rape cases.
Are rape cases in both NRL and AFL so neither can really point the fingure.
Re: 2014 Rugby League Four Nations
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:05 am
by post_hoc
so the part in my post where I said,
"wookie, football isn't limited to 4 countries like rugby league is, and before the rugby league idiots get on here and call me a liar and say its not 4 it is 8 or 9 or 7 or whatever, it is 4 countries in any significant manner."
Parraeels comes back with
"Btw liar, post the so called 4 nations that only play RL.
But but but, I don't want to will be the reply."
Indicating that
1) He really can't comprehend what people write
2) Proves my point exactly
I said 4 countries in any significant manner, I would argue 3 England, NZ and Aust. The fourth well PNG it is popular but they aren't up to speed yet, but they have embraced it so I would argue they are the fourth, but you might have a different argument on that.
France 30 years ago I would say yes, but not anymore, and no to wales.
Re: 2014 Rugby League Four Nations
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 5:49 pm
by Foolproof
Rugby League is played in a lot more countries than just three or four. Sure, the big three play it better than anyone else, but it's wider than you think. It's not a worldwide sport like soccer of course, but it's about.