Talking Footy

Swans4ever wrote:

FFS you call AFL posters delusional - 13 k turn up in RU heartland and you can't handle it - yet 12k turn up in Perth who you have been telling us will become a RL state because of all the NSW migration and you can't answer the simplist of questions - the rampant denial is very funny - hahaha!

20K turned up in Perth last year for a game that didn't have a monsoon hit it
20K will turn up again later this year when Souths play the Warriors the 2nd sellout in Perth 2 years in a row for that game
we're selling venues out in VFL heartland

50K attended RL games over 2 days in Auckland earlier in the year
so we're selling out venues in RU heartland as well

tell me

is the fumbles & feebles selling out any venues outside of their heartland ?
anything ??

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

FFS you call AFL posters delusional - 13 k turn up in RU heartland and you can't handle it - yet 12k turn up in Perth who you have been telling us will become a RL state because of all the NSW migration and you can't answer the simplist of questions - the rampant denial is very funny - hahaha!

20K turned up in Perth last year for a game that didn't have a monsoon hit it
20K will turn up again later this year when Souths play the Warriors the 2nd sellout in Perth 2 years in a row for that game
we're selling venues out in VFL heartland

50K attended RL games over 2 days in Auckland earlier in the year
so we're selling out venues in RU heartland as well

tell me

is the fumbles & feebles selling out any venues outside of their heartland ?
anything ??

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

monsoon? The AFL still had a near full house only a few minutes drive away. RL fans allergic to precipitation

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

FFS you call AFL posters delusional - 13 k turn up in RU heartland and you can't handle it - yet 12k turn up in Perth who you have been telling us will become a RL state because of all the NSW migration and you can't answer the simplist of questions - the rampant denial is very funny - hahaha!

20K turned up in Perth last year for a game that didn't have a monsoon hit it
20K will turn up again later this year when Souths play the Warriors the 2nd sellout in Perth 2 years in a row for that game
we're selling venues out in VFL heartland

50K attended RL games over 2 days in Auckland earlier in the year
so we're selling out venues in RU heartland as well

tell me

is the fumbles & feebles selling out any venues outside of their heartland ?
anything ??

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

monsoon? The AFL still had a near full house only a few minutes drive away. RL fans allergic to precipitation

8000 less then capacity is a fullhouse is it :_<> :_<> :_<>
fullhouses in Perth 2 years in a row
fullhouses in Melbourne as well
& Auckland
& London
& Wellington

none of which are our heartland cities

maybe you can help me with fumbles & feebles games selling out venues outside of their heartland
must be heaps eh

got anything for us
take your time

can you tell me where they

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

FFS you call AFL posters delusional - 13 k turn up in RU heartland and you can't handle it - yet 12k turn up in Perth who you have been telling us will become a RL state because of all the NSW migration and you can't answer the simplist of questions - the rampant denial is very funny - hahaha!

20K turned up in Perth last year for a game that didn't have a monsoon hit it
20K will turn up again later this year when Souths play the Warriors the 2nd sellout in Perth 2 years in a row for that game
we're selling venues out in VFL heartland

50K attended RL games over 2 days in Auckland earlier in the year
so we're selling out venues in RU heartland as well

tell me

is the fumbles & feebles selling out any venues outside of their heartland ?
anything ??

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

monsoon? The AFL still had a near full house only a few minutes drive away. RL fans allergic to precipitation

8000 less then capacity is a fullhouse is it :_<> :_<> :_<>
fullhouses in Perth 2 years in a row
fullhouses in Melbourne as well
& Auckland
& London
& Wellington

none of which are our heartland cities

maybe you can help me with fumbles & feebles games selling out venues outside of their heartland
must be heaps eh

got anything for us
take your time

can you tell me where they

I said "near"

The NRL crowd almost halved due to the rain. The AFL crowd was still more than respectable. :_<>

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

FFS you call AFL posters delusional - 13 k turn up in RU heartland and you can't handle it - yet 12k turn up in Perth who you have been telling us will become a RL state because of all the NSW migration and you can't answer the simplist of questions - the rampant denial is very funny - hahaha!

20K turned up in Perth last year for a game that didn't have a monsoon hit it
20K will turn up again later this year when Souths play the Warriors the 2nd sellout in Perth 2 years in a row for that game
we're selling venues out in VFL heartland

50K attended RL games over 2 days in Auckland earlier in the year
so we're selling out venues in RU heartland as well

tell me

is the fumbles & feebles selling out any venues outside of their heartland ?
anything ??

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

monsoon? The AFL still had a near full house only a few minutes drive away. RL fans allergic to precipitation

8000 less then capacity is a fullhouse is it :_<> :_<> :_<>
fullhouses in Perth 2 years in a row
fullhouses in Melbourne as well
& Auckland
& London
& Wellington

none of which are our heartland cities

maybe you can help me with fumbles & feebles games selling out venues outside of their heartland
must be heaps eh

got anything for us
take your time

can you tell me where they

I said "near"

The NRL crowd almost halved due to the rain. The AFL crowd was still more than respectable. :_<>

Last I looked Wellington in NZ and Perth is in Australia - if any city has the capacity to have as big or bigger crowd it would be in the same country where that sport is the top country in the world but no it gets 8000 less - so much for a National sport!!

Swans4ever wrote:

Maybe because they see it as a half baked version of RU!!!

Maybe you should investigate the ANC first >

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Maybe because they see it as a half baked version of RU!!!

Maybe you should investigate the ANC first >

He supports & defends a sport with an unwritten One whitey parent rule.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Maybe because they see it as a half baked version of RU!!!

Maybe you should investigate the ANC first >

He supports & defends a sport with an unwritten One whitey parent rule.

You got proof of this unwritten rule? Anything to show its actually more than a comment from a concerned recruiter?

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Maybe because they see it as a half baked version of RU!!!

Maybe you should investigate the ANC first >

He supports & defends a sport with an unwritten One whitey parent rule.

You got proof of this unwritten rule? Anything to show its actually more than a comment from a concerned recruiter?

What more do you want.
I have posted links to this many times & all you mob do is say nah ,that's not right.
Please tell me where I am wrong./
He stated it.
Then The AFL met with him .
Then suddenly he didn't really mean what he said.. Strange that.

Then he is out of a job..

You can ignore it all you want ..he said it .
& the follow up article showing only 3 indigenous players were drafted ,probably showed he was close to the truth..

But like all good fumblers ...just ignore the racism in your sport...The rest of us will laugh .

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Maybe because they see it as a half baked version of RU!!!

Maybe you should investigate the ANC first >

He supports & defends a sport with an unwritten One whitey parent rule.

You got proof of this unwritten rule? Anything to show its actually more than a comment from a concerned recruiter?

What more do you want.
I have posted links to this many times & all you mob do is say nah ,that's not right.
Please tell me where I am wrong./
He stated it.
Then The AFL met with him .
Then suddenly he didn't really mean what he said.. Strange that.

Then he is out of a job..

You can ignore it all you want ..he said it .
& the follow up article showing only 3 indigenous players were drafted ,probably showed he was close to the truth..

But like all good fumblers ...just ignore the racism in your sport...The rest of us will laugh .

Youve only posted comments from someone who explained it wasnt a rule, it was a comment to an AFL indigenous officer expressing concern about the potential if players weren't supported.

If it was a rule then we wouldn't see indigenous players recruited would we >

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Maybe because they see it as a half baked version of RU!!!

Maybe you should investigate the ANC first >

He supports & defends a sport with an unwritten One whitey parent rule.

You got proof of this unwritten rule? Anything to show its actually more than a comment from a concerned recruiter?

What more do you want.
I have posted links to this many times & all you mob do is say nah ,that's not right.
Please tell me where I am wrong./
He stated it.
Then The AFL met with him .
Then suddenly he didn't really mean what he said.. Strange that.

Then he is out of a job..

You can ignore it all you want ..he said it .
& the follow up article showing only 3 indigenous players were drafted ,probably showed he was close to the truth..

But like all good fumblers ...just ignore the racism in your sport...The rest of us will laugh .

Youve only posted comments from someone who explained it wasnt a rule, it was a comment to an AFL indigenous officer expressing concern about the potential if players weren't supported.

If it was a rule then we wouldn't see indigenous players recruited would we >

There was a decline after he let the cat out of the bag.
Coincidence ...I think not..
I think he was on the money.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Maybe because they see it as a half baked version of RU!!!

Maybe you should investigate the ANC first >

He supports & defends a sport with an unwritten One whitey parent rule.

You got proof of this unwritten rule? Anything to show its actually more than a comment from a concerned recruiter?

What more do you want.
I have posted links to this many times & all you mob do is say nah ,that's not right.
Please tell me where I am wrong./
He stated it.
Then The AFL met with him .
Then suddenly he didn't really mean what he said.. Strange that.

Then he is out of a job..

You can ignore it all you want ..he said it .
& the follow up article showing only 3 indigenous players were drafted ,probably showed he was close to the truth..

But like all good fumblers ...just ignore the racism in your sport...The rest of us will laugh .

Youve only posted comments from someone who explained it wasnt a rule, it was a comment to an AFL indigenous officer expressing concern about the potential if players weren't supported.

If it was a rule then we wouldn't see indigenous players recruited would we >

There was a decline after he let the cat out of the bag.
Coincidence ...I think not..
I think he was on the money.

Decline in what? Recruiting of indigenous players? I already showed you the recent numbers which indicate more have been invited to try out for recruitment than ever before. If it was a rule none would be recruited, correct?

If that's the case then you can obviously name all players drafted last year under the one white parent rule????? No.....thought not just another BS claim that has no evidence whatsoever to support it!!!

Swans4ever wrote:

If that's the case then you can obviously name all players drafted last year under the one white parent rule????? No.....thought not just another BS claim that has no evidence whatsoever to support it!!!

BS ...How so .
The bloke admitted it .
Lost his job over it .
It was in the media ..For days..
But in your little insular AFL is Good world ,that means nothing.

& You want to know about lat yr .
Ask the clubs ,but seeing as they seen what happens to anyone who tells it like it is ,do you think they will admit to doing it.

Get out of whatever mushroom you live under & live in the real world.

Hold on ..
I am talking to a bloke who follows the biggest LEGAL cheats in AUS sport.
COLA.
& thinks that's OK..

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

If that's the case then you can obviously name all players drafted last year under the one white parent rule????? No.....thought not just another BS claim that has no evidence whatsoever to support it!!!

BS ...How so .
The bloke admitted it .
Lost his job over it .
It was in the media ..For days..
But in your little insular AFL is Good world ,that means nothing.

& You want to know about lat yr .
Ask the clubs ,but seeing as they seen what happens to anyone who tells it like it is ,do you think they will admit to doing it.

Get out of whatever mushroom you live under & live in the real world.

Hold on ..
I am talking to a bloke who follows the biggest LEGAL cheats in AUS sport.
COLA.
& thinks that's OK..

Admitted what exactly? Careful now, you don't want to be found lying again today....