Talking Footy

Hey whoa Xman! Did you forget what the MP was answering when he said what he said? It was about the AFL player salaries! There's your intent!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Hey whoa Xman! Did you forget what the MP was answering when he said what he said? It was about the AFL player salaries! There's your intent!

seeing as the first bit of the OP was about RL players..
I replied to that .

Can you show me where I compared the NRL to AFL...
I'll wait.

Xman wrote:

Cracker wrote:

No. I stand by my statements as correct and truthful. I will not apologise for something I have not done. He will admit to the insinuation.

Insinuation requires an intention, which he stated from the outset he never had. He was defending his own code against people on this forum, not accusing the AFL of anything. Therefore you misinterpreted his intention and should admit it and apologise.

I did no such thing as previously stated. As NRLCrap1 rightly pointed out, the first post was about the AFL salaries. Therefore to the casual reader it can easily be seen that AFLcrap1 was insinuated what I said he was. His intent was to attack the AFL via defending the NRL putting the NRL player payment arrangements over as better. Better than who? Better than the AFL.

I will repeat this one more time. I will not apologise, as I have done nothing wrong and I have spoken the truth.

Cracker wrote:

Xman wrote:

Cracker wrote:

No. I stand by my statements as correct and truthful. I will not apologise for something I have not done. He will admit to the insinuation.

Insinuation requires an intention, which he stated from the outset he never had. He was defending his own code against people on this forum, not accusing the AFL of anything. Therefore you misinterpreted his intention and should admit it and apologise.

I did no such thing as previously stated. As NRLCrap1 rightly pointed out, the first post was about the AFL salaries. Therefore to the casual reader it can easily be seen that AFLcrap1 was insinuated what I said he was. His intent was to attack the AFL via defending the NRL putting the NRL player payment arrangements over as better. Better than who? Better than the AFL.

I will repeat this one more time. I will not apologise, as I have done nothing wrong and I have spoken the truth.

You should because your interpretation of his comment was incorrect as he stated. Its irrelevant what you thought he meant. The only relevance is what he actually meant

You are not correct.

Cracker wrote:

Xman wrote:

Cracker wrote:

No. I stand by my statements as correct and truthful. I will not apologise for something I have not done. He will admit to the insinuation.

Insinuation requires an intention, which he stated from the outset he never had. He was defending his own code against people on this forum, not accusing the AFL of anything. Therefore you misinterpreted his intention and should admit it and apologise.

I did no such thing as previously stated. As NRLCrap1 rightly pointed out, the first post was about the AFL salaries. Therefore to the casual reader it can easily be seen that AFLcrap1 was insinuated what I said he was. His intent was to attack the AFL via defending the NRL putting the NRL player payment arrangements over as better. Better than who? Better than the AFL.

I will repeat this one more time. I will not apologise, as I have done nothing wrong and I have spoken the truth.

So now you are reading something else into what I posted..
Go bacfk & read the first part of the Opening post.
It was having a go at RL players working a 2nd job.
I explained why .
How hard is that to understand.
I didn't mention AFL & what they do .
You have serious mental health issues.
& dumber than a bag of hammers.

You didn't have to actually say AFL. The insinuation is there for all to see.

If you are unable to see it then it is you who has the serious issues.

I'll put this plainly for you to understand.

I don't believe you.

Cracker wrote:

You didn't have to actually say AFL. The insinuation is there for all to see.

If you are unable to see it then it is you who has the serious issues.

I'll put this plainly for you to understand.

I don't believe you.

Get Fucked you simpleton.
I posted nothing about AFL .
You straight out lied about what I posted .



XMAN I am fucking sick & tired of the continuous lies .
I post something & these braindead hicks read something completely different.

Straighten this backward hick out..

Xman wrote:

Cracker wrote:

Xman wrote:

Cracker wrote:

No. I stand by my statements as correct and truthful. I will not apologise for something I have not done. He will admit to the insinuation.

Insinuation requires an intention, which he stated from the outset he never had. He was defending his own code against people on this forum, not accusing the AFL of anything. Therefore you misinterpreted his intention and should admit it and apologise.

I did no such thing as previously stated. As NRLCrap1 rightly pointed out, the first post was about the AFL salaries. Therefore to the casual reader it can easily be seen that AFLcrap1 was insinuated what I said he was. His intent was to attack the AFL via defending the NRL putting the NRL player payment arrangements over as better. Better than who? Better than the AFL.

I will repeat this one more time. I will not apologise, as I have done nothing wrong and I have spoken the truth.

You should because your interpretation of his comment was incorrect as he stated. Its irrelevant what you thought he meant. The only relevance is what he actually meant

Why are you defending him, Xman? He's only saying what he's saying now because he was called out! He's a lying little you-know-what! I saw the insinuation. So did Swans! Come on!

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

Cracker wrote:

Xman wrote:

Cracker wrote:

No. I stand by my statements as correct and truthful. I will not apologise for something I have not done. He will admit to the insinuation.

Insinuation requires an intention, which he stated from the outset he never had. He was defending his own code against people on this forum, not accusing the AFL of anything. Therefore you misinterpreted his intention and should admit it and apologise.

I did no such thing as previously stated. As NRLCrap1 rightly pointed out, the first post was about the AFL salaries. Therefore to the casual reader it can easily be seen that AFLcrap1 was insinuated what I said he was. His intent was to attack the AFL via defending the NRL putting the NRL player payment arrangements over as better. Better than who? Better than the AFL.

I will repeat this one more time. I will not apologise, as I have done nothing wrong and I have spoken the truth.

You should because your interpretation of his comment was incorrect as he stated. Its irrelevant what you thought he meant. The only relevance is what he actually meant

Why are you defending him, Xman? He's only saying what he's saying now because he was called out! He's a lying little you-know-what! I saw the insinuation. So did Swans! Come on!

I don't make insinuations ..
I say what I mean .
Like this.
You, Cwackhead, & swines are simpletons,liars & lack basic comprehension skills

Xman.
How the fuck are you supposed to debete/ argue about sports when i spend most of my time defending Myself against straight out lies..
& if they they want to lie about what I post . Then 2 can play at that game ..

Straighten these fuckwits out or its open slather.New rules don't seem to mean shit..
No fucking proof at all has been posted that I said anything about AFL ,yet this shit continues..

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

Cracker wrote:

Xman wrote:

Cracker wrote:

No. I stand by my statements as correct and truthful. I will not apologise for something I have not done. He will admit to the insinuation.

Insinuation requires an intention, which he stated from the outset he never had. He was defending his own code against people on this forum, not accusing the AFL of anything. Therefore you misinterpreted his intention and should admit it and apologise.

I did no such thing as previously stated. As NRLCrap1 rightly pointed out, the first post was about the AFL salaries. Therefore to the casual reader it can easily be seen that AFLcrap1 was insinuated what I said he was. His intent was to attack the AFL via defending the NRL putting the NRL player payment arrangements over as better. Better than who? Better than the AFL.

I will repeat this one more time. I will not apologise, as I have done nothing wrong and I have spoken the truth.

You should because your interpretation of his comment was incorrect as he stated. Its irrelevant what you thought he meant. The only relevance is what he actually meant

Why are you defending him, Xman? He's only saying what he's saying now because he was called out! He's a lying little you-know-what! I saw the insinuation. So did Swans! Come on!

He only ever insinuated we shouldn't pick on the NRL Because they have their own way of dealing with players futures after they retire. He never said anything about the AFL, or if the NRLs method was better, worse, or otherwise. Just because he's a RL supporter doesn't mean I can't support him when he's right.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Xman wrote:

Cracker wrote:

Xman wrote:

Cracker wrote:

No. I stand by my statements as correct and truthful. I will not apologise for something I have not done. He will admit to the insinuation.

Insinuation requires an intention, which he stated from the outset he never had. He was defending his own code against people on this forum, not accusing the AFL of anything. Therefore you misinterpreted his intention and should admit it and apologise.

I did no such thing as previously stated. As NRLCrap1 rightly pointed out, the first post was about the AFL salaries. Therefore to the casual reader it can easily be seen that AFLcrap1 was insinuated what I said he was. His intent was to attack the AFL via defending the NRL putting the NRL player payment arrangements over as better. Better than who? Better than the AFL.

I will repeat this one more time. I will not apologise, as I have done nothing wrong and I have spoken the truth.

You should because your interpretation of his comment was incorrect as he stated. Its irrelevant what you thought he meant. The only relevance is what he actually meant

Why are you defending him, Xman? He's only saying what he's saying now because he was called out! He's a lying little you-know-what! I saw the insinuation. So did Swans! Come on!

I don't make insinuations ..
I say what I mean .
Like this.
You, Cwackhead, & swines are simpletons,liars & lack basic comprehension skills

Xman.
How the fuck are you supposed to debete/ argue about sports when i spend most of my time defending Myself against straight out lies..
& if they they want to lie about what I post . Then 2 can play at that game ..

Straighten these fuckwits out or its open slather.New rules don't seem to mean shit..
No fucking proof at all has been posted that I said anything about AFL ,yet this shit continues..

I can't straighten out opinions, theyre entitled to have them, even if theyre wrong. I'd suggest you ignore it because you know youre right just like I know youre right. There's a fair chance cracker is simply trolling

But His original post was not an opinion ,'HE STATED that I said something.
That was bullshit.A staright out lie..
& you can bet I am going to have plenty of opinions on what these AFL fans post.
Wont be anything to do with what they post ,but hey if they can get away with it then I expect to be able to as well.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

But His original post was not an opinion ,'HE STATED that I said something.
That was bullshit.A staright out lie..
& you can bet I am going to have plenty of opinions on what these AFL fans post.
Wont be anything to do with what they post ,but hey if they can get away with it then I expect to be able to as well.

But its his interpretation of your comment so its based on an opinion. I simply cannot control opinions because everyone has the right to have one

Bullshit.
I stated something.
He claimed I said something else..He says I STATED ..I never fucking stated what he claimed..

Where is the proof..
There is none .

& the opinion bit is a fucking COP OUT.
It means you can change whatever anyone posts & hide behind its an opinion.

No its a joke.