Page 6 of 9

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 10:08 am
by King-Eliagh
I played there in 2009/10. You make some fair points re time and change swinesy but look I just don't want people lying and/or exaggerating about what's happening o/s in terms of marngrook. The IC is a funny lil thing in itself and I'd be very very surprised if this has lifted the miniscule profile of marngrook in france. It's primarily bunches of expats getting into some self funded fun in a park. Marngrook will always be like that o/s until AustraLIAn is taken out of the sports official name. And even then it would struggle to gain an ant sized foothold in Europe for atleast 100years.

It's just the way it is and its kinda embarrassing for you lot if you don't see it as thus. I mean, if you don't want to look and be called delusional then... ;)

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 12:04 pm
by Swans4ever
King-Eliagh wrote:
I played there in 2009/10. You make some fair points re time and change swinesy but look I just don't want people lying and/or exaggerating about what's happening o/s in terms of marngrook. The IC is a funny lil thing in itself and I'd be very very surprised if this has lifted the miniscule profile of marngrook in france. It's primarily bunches of expats getting into some self funded fun in a park. Marngrook will always be like that o/s until AustraLIAn is taken out of the sports official name. And even then it would struggle to gain an ant sized foothold in Europe for atleast 100years.

It's just the way it is and its kinda embarrassing for you lot if you don't see it as thus. I mean, if you don't want to look and be called delusional then... ;)
Look I agree the sport would pail in comparison to other sports and would be a niche sport of very little standing but it does appear there is more local participants involved there face book page shows regular items
https://m.facebook.com/profile.php?id=173946682628303
It may have improved since those embryonic days in 09/10. That's my only point and don't take my words as a criticism.

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 12:43 pm
by Cracker
King-Eliagh wrote:
Cracker wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
Cracker wrote:
I would expect this from a person who does not know how to be polite when required to.
I would expect someone who realises their mistake not to respond to questioning.

And please, point to where I lied?
That's better. Now I'll respond to your question and point to your constantly changing story about your experience in central Australia. That is a lie. Your claimed poor memory is very convenient - or you are in the early stages of Alzheimer's (which I doubt very seriously). Either that or your experience wasn't important enough to remember. There are too many unanswered questions relating to that entire story which is why at present I believe that you lied about it.

That's the one that I am aware of. If anyone can add any please do. And be specific unlike Cos789.
^^^ dipshit

Constantly changing story? That's factually wrong, you've just made that shit up ;)

And I apologise but I don't have a photographic memory of the many and varied places I've travelled. And you, my dipshit, clearly don't understand how memory works in the brain of a human.
Yes, constantly changing your story. Every time aspects were called out, either by me or by TLPG, you changed your story to fit in with the new and backed up information. It has got to the point that we don't know what to believe when you speak.

I understand perfectly how memory works in the brain of a human being. It reflects in my comment that you quoted. One of the three options applies to you (well two really as I stated) and there are no other explanations available.

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 12:48 pm
by King-Eliagh
You got no idea. Prove your first sentence cwacker. Link and show where. Alls I did was forget where santa Theresa was and mixed it up with one of the many communities north of mparntwe on the hwy. No other explanations available he says :roll: How narrow minded is this git? [-X

Get yourself a hammer and give your head a few firm taps matey. There's something not right up there :lol:

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 1:05 pm
by Cracker
See, there you go again. Most of the communities are west of the Alice, not north. Communities north of Alice Springs on the Stuart Highway number very few. You said you'd been to Hermannsburg but failed to spell it correctly, and didn't know how to correctly pronounce Ltyentye Apurte - Hermannsburg's great rivals (and TLPG did in fact know how to pronounce it by the way). You said you coached, but then changed that to viewing only at the same time as the spelling and pronunciation situation was raised.

You simply can not be relied upon to be accurate. When I spoke of no other options being available I was referring to your memory issues, if they exist because we still don't know if you are telling the truth or making it all up.

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 2:11 pm
by King-Eliagh
I did coach, just not directly in the communities. I never "changed coaching to viewing", you just made that shit up in your malfunctioning brain.

The rest of your post is also nuttin but trollop trying to prove something that just aint there. Yeah like misspelling a place name means you've never been there. Mass ASSumption number 1. :roll: And yeah like not knowing how to pronounce the place name of Ntaria's rival means you've never lived in Central Australia. Mass ASSumption number 2. Do you actually understand how dumb you sound dipshit? :lol:

Dead set pathetic.

I'll be counting your ASSumptions up from now on dipshit. :wink:

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 4:52 pm
by cos789
King-Eliagh wrote:
I did ....
flog a dead horse.

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:18 pm
by King-Eliagh
cos789 wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
I did ....
flog a dead horse.
:lol: cos lettuce you lil sandgropin tool you!

Welcome back chumpo :thumbleft: . We've missed you and your floggin of the deadest horse in the world... international 'Australian' 'Rules' :(/

The terms are a complete contradiction in themselves! As you are cos lettuce, as you are :_<>

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 6:02 pm
by NRLCrap1
Here's another lie for your list, Cracker. He didn't loss a bet with Drac and he DID!!

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 7:35 pm
by AFLcrap1
NRLCrap1 wrote:
Here's another lie for your list, Cracker. He didn't loss a bet with Drac and he DID!!
I don't think Cracker will take notice of you.
You keep calling him a GOOSE
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2014 12:34 am
by King-Eliagh
Oi! Cwapper? Shut yer yapping dog. I know, your owner has abandoned you. It must be tough. But shut it anyway ya lil bitch.

Oh and just and a lil reminder for ya. I was "leaning towards the AFL on that one". Remember? :lol:

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2014 1:49 pm
by Cracker
King-Eliagh wrote:
I did coach, just not directly in the communities. I never "changed coaching to viewing", you just made that shit up in your malfunctioning brain.

The rest of your post is also nuttin but trollop trying to prove something that just aint there. Yeah like misspelling a place name means you've never been there. Mass ASSumption number 1. :roll: And yeah like not knowing how to pronounce the place name of Ntaria's rival means you've never lived in Central Australia. Mass ASSumption number 2. Do you actually understand how dumb you sound dipshit? :lol:

Dead set pathetic.

I'll be counting your ASSumptions up from now on dipshit. :wink:
You changing coaching to viewing when you were challenged on the coaching point in the communities. There is no other way to coach them other than directly in the communities. This is not made up. This is what you said and did.

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2014 3:24 pm
by King-Eliagh
cwackpot wrote:
There is no other way to coach them other than directly in the communities.
So school teams aren't coached? School teams don't involve students from communities? Several schools enrol students from remote commmunities. One, Yirara College enrols only Aboriginal students from remote and very remote communities. You really are quite narrow minded aren't you. I wish I didn't have to ram it down your throat all the time and you would just show some respect towards what I say. It just makes you look stoopid mate. ;)

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 8:27 pm
by Cracker
So you are a physical education teacher?

Re: Poll - Do you want all substantial claims to be backed u

Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:51 am
by NRLCrap1
No way! He couldn't tell the difference between a jumping jack and a flap jack!