Page 6 of 9

Re: What is a VFL participant

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 7:02 pm
by 214Four
Phelpsy wrote:
What was touch football a few years back. Union could claim it is a non contact for of union ? I don't by it ... If it wasn't rl two years ago I can't see how it can be rl now
Touch football and Oztag are based around League rules not union(ie 6 tackle rule)

Re: What is a VFL participant

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 7:04 pm
by Raiderdave
NRLCrap1 wrote:
This from someone who has a history of being unable to read, comprehend etc etc!
take the wager you gutless singlet wearing sheila [-( [-( [-( [-( [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X

Re: What is a VFL participant

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 7:15 pm
by 214Four
Raiderdave wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:
This from someone who has a history of being unable to read, comprehend etc etc!
take the wager you gutless singlet wearing sheila [-( [-( [-( [-( [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X [-X
hahaha

Re: What is a VFL participant

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 7:30 pm
by Fred
I know but union have tried to claim this form of the game as you can see from my post above

Re: What is a VFL participant

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 7:37 pm
by Fred
I thought Dave didn't bet with AFL supporters ? He has said that over and over to avoid having to bet on the many claims he has made. Now he has the hide to call others out for not betting.


Still no comment on the nrl press release outlining that touch and rl are two different sports ? Like where it says "the two sports" etc.

Re: What is a VFL participant

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 7:54 pm
by Raiderdave
Phelpsy wrote:
I know but union have tried to claim this form of the game as you can see from my post above
tell me Einstein

why would union claim a game that has a play the ball & 6 uses of the ball
oh that's right
they didn't :wink:

they attempted to create their own version our game &
failed :wink:

The Education I'm giving you is free dipshit
no need to thank me :cool:

Re: What is a VFL participant

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 7:57 pm
by Raiderdave
Phelpsy wrote:
I thought Dave didn't bet with AFL supporters ? He has said that over and over to avoid having to bet on the many claims he has made. Now he has the hide to call others out for not betting.

.
hey hey
its a new year cockhead
Ive changed

shame fumblers haven't though :-k
still the spineless shirt lifters they have always been :wink:

Re: What is a VFL participant

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:34 pm
by NRLCrap1
You haven't changed, Dave. Still whining and crying when you don't get your way like a baby without it's dummy.

Re: What is a VFL participant

Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2014 11:25 pm
by 214Four
adamj1300 wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:
Now it's 1.4 million? Didn't someone say on another thread it was just 50,000?

No, 1.4 million for rugby league would be about right. When you consider that for AFL it would be a lot MORE than that!
in the NRL 2013 financial report they claim there on top of the registed players playing NRL now days, another 1.4 million people enjoyed the NRL expericence
http://rugbyleague2013.nrl.com/PDF/NRL- ... e-2013.pdf
around page 22
its a typical NRL report plenty of chest beating inflated numbers & no evidence

there have been reports done on the AFL

NSW 7.4M / 32.08%
1st. Rugby League = 112.28 ([4 x 32.08]+[3x32.08]÷2)
1st. Football/Soccer = 112.28
3rd. Rugby Union = 64.16
4th. Aussie Rules = 32.08

VIC 5.7M / 24.79%
1st. Aussie Rules = 99.16
2nd. Football/Soccer = 74.37 (3 x 24.79)
3rd. Rugby League = 37.18
3rd. Rugby Union = 37.18

QLD 4.6M / 20.13%
1st. Rugby League = 80.52 (4 x 20.13)
2nd. Football/Soccer = 40.08
2nd. Aussie Rules = 40.08
2nd. Rugby Union = 40.08

WA 2.3M / 10.79%
1st. Aussie Rules = 43.16
2nd. Football/soccer = 32.37
3rd. Rugby Union = 21.58
4th. Rugby League = 10.79 (1 x 10.79)

SA 1.7M / 7.26%
1st. Aussie Rules = 29.04
2nd. Football/Soccer = 21.78
3rd. no sufficient prescence
4th. no sufficient prescence

TAS 512K / 2.24%
1st. Aussie Rules = 8.96
2nd. Football/Soccer = 6.72
3rd. no sufficient prescence
3rd. no sufficient prescence

ACT 380K / 1.66%
1st. Rugby Union = 6.64
2nd. Rugby League = 4.98
3rd. Aussie Rules = 2.49
3rd. Football/soccer = 2.49

NT 237K / 1.0%
1st. Aussie Rules = 4.00
2nd. Rugby League = 3.00
3rd. Football/soccer = 2.00 (2 x 20.13)
4th. Rugby Union
= 1.00

OVERALL
1st. Football/soccer (292.09)
2nd. Aussie Rules (258.97)
3rd Rugby League (248.75)
4th Rugby Union (170.64)[/b]
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=6&start=

its another ******** post buy dickless dave in a attempt to fulfill his insecurity :thumbleft:
they are my figures i came up with for each state trying to be from the most neutral perspective i could. i hope you didnt confuse them as any offical figuresbecvause they arnt, just my assumption :)

Re: What is a VFL participant

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:29 am
by Raiderdave
214Four wrote:
adamj1300 wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:
Now it's 1.4 million? Didn't someone say on another thread it was just 50,000?

No, 1.4 million for rugby league would be about right. When you consider that for AFL it would be a lot MORE than that!
in the NRL 2013 financial report they claim there on top of the registed players playing NRL now days, another 1.4 million people enjoyed the NRL expericence
http://rugbyleague2013.nrl.com/PDF/NRL- ... e-2013.pdf
around page 22
its a typical NRL report plenty of chest beating inflated numbers & no evidence

there have been reports done on the AFL

NSW 7.4M / 32.08%
1st. Rugby League = 112.28 ([4 x 32.08]+[3x32.08]÷2)
1st. Football/Soccer = 112.28
3rd. Rugby Union = 64.16
4th. Aussie Rules = 32.08

VIC 5.7M / 24.79%
1st. Aussie Rules = 99.16
2nd. Football/Soccer = 74.37 (3 x 24.79)
3rd. Rugby League = 37.18
3rd. Rugby Union = 37.18

QLD 4.6M / 20.13%
1st. Rugby League = 80.52 (4 x 20.13)
2nd. Football/Soccer = 40.08
2nd. Aussie Rules = 40.08
2nd. Rugby Union = 40.08

WA 2.3M / 10.79%
1st. Aussie Rules = 43.16
2nd. Football/soccer = 32.37
3rd. Rugby Union = 21.58
4th. Rugby League = 10.79 (1 x 10.79)

SA 1.7M / 7.26%
1st. Aussie Rules = 29.04
2nd. Football/Soccer = 21.78
3rd. no sufficient prescence
4th. no sufficient prescence

TAS 512K / 2.24%
1st. Aussie Rules = 8.96
2nd. Football/Soccer = 6.72
3rd. no sufficient prescence
3rd. no sufficient prescence

ACT 380K / 1.66%
1st. Rugby Union = 6.64
2nd. Rugby League = 4.98
3rd. Aussie Rules = 2.49
3rd. Football/soccer = 2.49

NT 237K / 1.0%
1st. Aussie Rules = 4.00
2nd. Rugby League = 3.00
3rd. Football/soccer = 2.00 (2 x 20.13)
4th. Rugby Union
= 1.00

OVERALL
1st. Football/soccer (292.09)
2nd. Aussie Rules (258.97)
3rd Rugby League (248.75)
4th Rugby Union (170.64)[/b]
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=6&start=

its another ******** post buy dickless dave in a attempt to fulfill his insecurity :thumbleft:
they are my figures i came up with for each state trying to be from the most neutral perspective i could. i hope you didnt confuse them as any offical figuresbecvause they arnt, just my assumption :)
well its certainly an assumption
theres no way in hell soccer gets close to either RL or the fumbles & bumbles overall .... each codes dominance in their heartland states has them 1 & 2 nationally
& daylight is 3rd


the question is who's numb 1
RL is simply because it has an extra 2 million odd people in its heartland & a few more singlet clad tools screaming baaawwwwwwwwlllllll..... at the GGGGGGGGG..... don't count for a hill of beans in reality :wink:

Re: What is a VFL participant

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 7:22 am
by TLPG
You're wrong, Dave, and it's why I get POed at the AFL trying to target thugby when it should be targetting soccer! I haven't checked the other states but I do know that in Victoria the State League in soccer is huge, and that in Tasmania some private schools have opted for soccer over football (and AFL Tasmania is doing NOTHING about it!!). I think I also saw a sports results page that showed the New South Wales state league in soccer is about as big as it is in Victoria.

I'd be interested to hear from others on that from other states.

Re: What is a VFL participant

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:29 am
by NRLCrap1
I think it's about time some research was done outside all the previous parameters for all sports. Thorough analysis.

Re: What is a VFL participant

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 12:35 pm
by AFLcrap1
NRLCrap1 wrote:
I think it's about time some research was done outside all the previous parameters for all sports. Thorough analysis.
Yip yip, lap dog.

Re: What is a VFL participant

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:42 pm
by Raiderdave
TLPG wrote:
You're wrong, Dave, and it's why I get POed at the AFL trying to target thugby when it should be targetting soccer! I haven't checked the other states but I do know that in Victoria the State League in soccer is huge, and that in Tasmania some private schools have opted for soccer over football (and AFL Tasmania is doing NOTHING about it!!). I think I also saw a sports results page that showed the New South Wales state league in soccer is about as big as it is in Victoria.

I'd be interested to hear from others on that from other states.

& again this ********* & the point are in different post codes :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

you are again using participation numbers as proof of popularity
they are not
if a sport is easy to play & you won't get hurt .... people will play it to stay fit

but when they go home to watch their fav sports even these soccer players they watch RL north of the murray .... & the fumbles & bumbles .. south of it

theres 3 sports in this nation that matter to the populous & the TV broadcasters that pay hundreds of millions to show them

Cricket
RL
& the Fumbles & Bumbles ... although I can't see why ? :?>




end of :cool:

Re: What is a VFL participant

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 7:28 pm
by NRLCrap1
No players.....no game.

That's why playing numbers are important, Dave. That's the real world, not your fantasy world.