Page 6 of 7
Re: NRL tops Nations most watched sport again
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 1:55 pm
by Fred
I was thinking the same thing x man re dave. He is the one who makes up so many things and then when he is called on it goes quiet or responds with mwaaaaaaaaaaaa or some other inane crap. There is a thread on things Dave makes up. Hence why I blocked him and hence my experience of this forum has improved. Although some others do a good impersonation of Dave.
Re: NRL tops Nations most watched sport again
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 3:46 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:AFLcrap1 wrote:Xman wrote:Cut the wager rubbish out thanks. It doesn't belong one this board.
Tel me Xman ,why do you allow rubbish claims continuously from this backward hick ,yet when he is sked to produe a source or proof ,all he does is ,say you have to prove him wrong.
He makes the claim ,he should back it up with proof or have the balls to back it up with a wager.
Are you suggesting Raiderdave also doesn't make unsubstantiated claims? If we put a wager on every one of his ridiculous claims we'd never need to work again. This very thread is proof.
People are free to make claims, but when they fail to back them up with proof their failure is there for all to see. We don't need to head down this farcical "wager" road thanks.
NRLc has claimed he cannot find evidence of junior RL participation numbers in AFL states. Whether this is true or not, how the hell is he supposed to find evidence of no evidence??

> if Dave disagrees he is free to provide evidence to the contrary.
and again folks we have the fumbling twat of a moderator showing his clear & unwavering bias against RL posters
Raider makes unsubstantiated claims

:_<> :_<> :_<> ... sure I do f wit
I make claims
& prove them
its just the little Vicky kicky cheerleaders in here don't like it ... & this very thread is proof of it
I make the claim after posting the clear proof via the article .... & we get nothing but feet stamping & hissy fits from fumblers

:_<> :_<>
Oh Oh .. its not true
its not true ..whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
everything I claim
I prove
& now folks to the lamest .. most pathetic attempt at defending a gutless twerp I have ever seen from anyone ... let alone a supposed impartial moderator
NRLc has claimed he cannot find evidence of junior RL participation numbers in AFL states. Whether this is true or not, how the hell is he supposed to find evidence of no evidence??

> if Dave disagrees he is free to provide evidence to the contrary
can't find evidence

>
MY FUCKING CAT COULD FIND THE EVIDENCE TO PROVE OR DISPROVE THIS CLAIM

:_<> :_<> :_<>
its another window to the IQ level of NRLcrap 1
a doorstop has this cockhead covered

:_<> :_<> :_<>
Jesus H folks
Jesus H
this forum has hit a new low with this effort folks
a new ... sad... low

Re: NRL tops Nations most watched sport again
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 4:24 pm
by Xman
Maybe get your cat to prove him wrong then...
Meow
Re: NRL tops Nations most watched sport again
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 4:32 pm
by AFLcrap1
XMAN SO by your rules you can claim anything doesnt exist as long as you claim ..i cant find evidence.
Opens up all sorts of venues for fun.
How about a simple ...Make a claim you back it up with a source..
So how will a thread go like .
All AFL players are Gay ..
Come on prove that wrong..
OR The average IQ of an AFL fan is below that of a housepant.
Prove that wrong
cause i couldnt find any evidence on google to dispute it
Nearly every forum i am on ,you must provide proof for claims ..why not here?
Re: NRL tops Nations most watched sport again
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 4:46 pm
by NRLCrap1
Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:AFLcrap1 wrote:Xman wrote:Cut the wager rubbish out thanks. It doesn't belong one this board.
Tel me Xman ,why do you allow rubbish claims continuously from this backward hick ,yet when he is sked to produe a source or proof ,all he does is ,say you have to prove him wrong.
He makes the claim ,he should back it up with proof or have the balls to back it up with a wager.
Are you suggesting Raiderdave also doesn't make unsubstantiated claims? If we put a wager on every one of his ridiculous claims we'd never need to work again. This very thread is proof.
People are free to make claims, but when they fail to back them up with proof their failure is there for all to see. We don't need to head down this farcical "wager" road thanks.
NRLc has claimed he cannot find evidence of junior RL participation numbers in AFL states. Whether this is true or not, how the hell is he supposed to find evidence of no evidence??

> if Dave disagrees he is free to provide evidence to the contrary.
and again folks we have the fumbling twat of a moderator showing his clear & unwavering bias against RL posters
Raider makes unsubstantiated claims

:_<> :_<> :_<> ... sure I do f wit
I make claims
& prove them
You do no such fricking thing, goose! You made the claim about juniors in Victoria, SA, WA and Tasmania, and when I called you for proof you tried to make a wager out of it. Now I knew that meant that you figured you had something (whatever that is) so I called your stupid bluff! And look at you run for it!
Why?
BECAUSE YOU'VE GOT NOTHING!!
THAT is PROOF of an unsubstantiated claim, Dave!
slowwwwww burnnnnnn............
(and the wager is banned, goose!)
Re: NRL tops Nations most watched sport again
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 4:51 pm
by Xman
AFLcrap1 wrote:XMAN SO by your rules you can claim anything doesnt exist as long as you claim ..i cant find evidence.
Opens up all sorts of venues for fun.
How about a simple ...Make a claim you back it up with a source..
So how will a thread go like .
All AFL players are Gay ..
Come on prove that wrong..
OR The average IQ of an AFL fan is below that of a housepant.
Prove that wrong
cause i couldnt find any evidence on google to dispute it
Nearly every forum i am on ,you must provide proof for claims ..why not here?
Not sure youre getting it. If you claim all AFL players are gay you need to find evidence of gay AFL players to maintain your credibility.
Similarly, a claim the average AFL fans IQ is that of a houseplant may be supported or refuted by comparing IQ levels of people from each state, since far larger proportions of each supporter group reside in the various states.
However, if NSWc has made a claim he cannot prove, since it isnt possible to provide evidence of no evidence, in this case evidence of no players. It is however, easy to disprove, which apparently Dave's cat knows how to do in this instance.
I fully support the claimant providing evidence, but NSWcs claim just cannot be proven, only disproven.
Re: NRL tops Nations most watched sport again
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 7:10 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:AFLcrap1 wrote:XMAN SO by your rules you can claim anything doesnt exist as long as you claim ..i cant find evidence.
Opens up all sorts of venues for fun.
How about a simple ...Make a claim you back it up with a source..
So how will a thread go like .
All AFL players are Gay ..
Come on prove that wrong..
OR The average IQ of an AFL fan is below that of a housepant.
Prove that wrong
cause i couldnt find any evidence on google to dispute it
Nearly every forum i am on ,you must provide proof for claims ..why not here?
Not sure youre getting it. .
I fully support the claimant providing evidence, but NSWcs claim just cannot be proven, only disproven.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
OMG
are you serious
of course they can proven you dribbler
by exactly the same source that would disprove them

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
the twat knows hes wrong
I mean he's never right ....
but also he is a gutless bigmouthed intellectual impaired fumbler.... & under the protection of our biased moderator
no one wonder this site is seen as 4th rate in both RL & fumbles n bumbles circles
with moderating of this standard & explanations of the calibre of the above

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
Bearsy needs to do something about this
this place is a joke
Re: NRL tops Nations most watched sport again
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 7:14 pm
by Raiderdave
NRLCrap1 wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:AFLcrap1 wrote:Xman wrote:Cut the wager rubbish out thanks. It doesn't belong one this board.
Tel me Xman ,why do you allow rubbish claims continuously from this backward hick ,yet when he is sked to produe a source or proof ,all he does is ,say you have to prove him wrong.
He makes the claim ,he should back it up with proof or have the balls to back it up with a wager.
Are you suggesting Raiderdave also doesn't make unsubstantiated claims? If we put a wager on every one of his ridiculous claims we'd never need to work again. This very thread is proof.
People are free to make claims, but when they fail to back them up with proof their failure is there for all to see. We don't need to head down this farcical "wager" road thanks.
NRLc has claimed he cannot find evidence of junior RL participation numbers in AFL states. Whether this is true or not, how the hell is he supposed to find evidence of no evidence??

> if Dave disagrees he is free to provide evidence to the contrary.
and again folks we have the fumbling twat of a moderator showing his clear & unwavering bias against RL posters
Raider makes unsubstantiated claims

:_<> :_<> :_<> ... sure I do f wit
I make claims
& prove them
I called you for proof
you called for proof eh.. you'll get it as I always provide proof
when you .............
take the wager you gutless singlet wearing sheila

Re: NRL tops Nations most watched sport again
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 7:20 pm
by AFLcrap1
How many threads has crapper ruined with his inane claims that he never backs up.
What a fucking joke .
If you want to debate something show some fuking proof,instead of demanding others prove you wrong.
& from what i have seen your middle name should be wrong..
Ps Im Dave ..
Re: NRL tops Nations most watched sport again
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 8:25 pm
by Fred
Welcome to our world re Dave lol
Re: NRL tops Nations most watched sport again
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 8:27 pm
by AFLcrap1
I have seen RD post some sources to his back up whatever he is claiming.
I have never seen crapper post one.
He is a fruitcake.
Re: NRL tops Nations most watched sport again
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 9:43 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:AFLcrap1 wrote:XMAN SO by your rules you can claim anything doesnt exist as long as you claim ..i cant find evidence.
Opens up all sorts of venues for fun.
How about a simple ...Make a claim you back it up with a source..
So how will a thread go like .
All AFL players are Gay ..
Come on prove that wrong..
OR The average IQ of an AFL fan is below that of a housepant.
Prove that wrong
cause i couldnt find any evidence on google to dispute it
Nearly every forum i am on ,you must provide proof for claims ..why not here?
Not sure youre getting it. .
I fully support the claimant providing evidence, but NSWcs claim just cannot be proven, only disproven.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
OMG
are you serious
of course they can proven you dribbler
by exactly the same source that would disprove them

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
the twat knows hes wrong
I mean he's never right ....
but also he is a gutless bigmouthed intellectual impaired fumbler.... & under the protection of our biased moderator
no one wonder this site is seen as 4th rate in both RL & fumbles n bumbles circles
with moderating of this standard & explanations of the calibre of the above

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
Bearsy needs to do something about this
this place is a joke
no surprise you don't get this. Why did I bother? :_<>
Re: NRL tops Nations most watched sport again
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 9:44 pm
by Xman
AFLcrap1 wrote:How many threads has crapper ruined with his inane claims that he never backs up.
What a fucking joke .
If you want to debate something show some fuking proof,instead of demanding others prove you wrong.
& from what i have seen your middle name should be wrong..
Ps Im Dave ..
Not nearly as many as Dave with his BS I can say that for sure.
Re: NRL tops Nations most watched sport again
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 9:52 pm
by AFLcrap1
Well how about a rule where proof of a claim must be made.
NOT WIKI..
Re: NRL tops Nations most watched sport again
Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 9:57 pm
by Xman
AFLcrap1 wrote:Well how about a rule where proof of a claim must be made.
NOT WIKI..
I agree with that rule. The only exception is a claim that cannot be proven, like can be the case when proving something doesn't exist. However, like when Dave has previously claimed AFL doesn't exist north of the Murray, these ludicrous claims are so easy to disprove its not an issue.
You need to lighten up. If I was to police every claim as you're suggesting Dave would rarely get a post in.