Page 6 of 11

Re: OMG................

Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 9:49 pm
by eelofwest
King-Eliagh wrote:
Xman wrote:
Of course the opening game of a club will be bigger. The next game was a more realistic idea of what crowds they should expect. You want me to bring up the titans crowds after their opening? :D

Well lets look then: round 1 2007, 42k for the titans v StGeorge. Next game vs Stgeorge was 26k
:lol: seeing your jaw drop as you read the official gws crowd woulda been priceless xman! :lol: you can say all you like now but you already indicated that such a low crowd would be disappointing last week mate. We know you were hoping for more, MUCH more :lol:

There there xman, there there.

:lol:
I would have took out equity on my home to see it King.... :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: OMG................

Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 10:00 pm
by King-Eliagh
Yes me too eels. But we can imagine cant we? I'm sure we've all got a pretty clear and accurate image of poor ol Xman the moment he saw the news of the 23k crowd in our minds. Here's mine.

Image

Whats yours folks?

Re: OMG................

Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 10:15 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:
Yes me too eels. But we can imagine cant we? I'm sure we've all got a pretty clear and accurate image of poor ol Xman the moment he saw the news of the 23k crowd in our minds. Here's mine.

Image

Whats yours folks?
Yeah, I was thinking 30k and I was 7k off. Isnt that almost the entire panthers crowd today? :lol: :lol:

Re: OMG................

Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 10:47 pm
by King-Eliagh
Xman, I know you like I was ur daddy. Apart from resembling a confused buffoon, you're highly conservative and in being so your statement of 30k was what you considered a safe bet so that you could come back and tell us all that GWS had, and i quote, a "good crowd" and are therefore going great guns. Secretly I'm sure you were expecting well above 30k and probably more like 40k.

Your avoidance in accepting 23k was not a good result, and even more amusingly foolish and simple, your sudden new found arguments to highlight that 23k was a good crowd is so clearly at odds with your original statement that 30k+ would be needed to consider the crowd a "good crowd" that all and sundry are either cringing or laughing at your comments. Hence my image is a fair and true indication of your reaction on seeing the result.

I rest my case. Yeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh :cool:

Re: OMG................

Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 10:54 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:
Xman, I know you like I was ur daddy. Apart from resembling a confused buffoon, you're highly conservative and in being so your statement of 30k was what you considered a safe bet so that you could come back and tell us all that GWS had, and i quote, a "good crowd" and are therefore going great guns. Secretly I'm sure you were expecting well above 30k and probably more like 40k.

Your avoidance in accepting 23k was not a good result, and even more amusingly foolish and simple, your sudden new found arguments to highlight that 23k was a good crowd is so clearly at odds with your original statement that 30k+ would be needed to consider the crowd a "good crowd" that all and sundry are either cringing or laughing at your comments. Hence my image is a fair and true indication of your reaction on seeing the result.

I rest my case. Yeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh :cool:
23k was in keeping with last years crowd. It would have been nice to see 30k but lets be real here. A match with 1st v last, and an away game for Sydney was never going to result in a big crowd.

The fact it was bigger than all other NRL games in Sydney on the day, and 3 times the size of the panthers crowd has given me some comfort. :wink:

Re: OMG................

Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:12 pm
by King-Eliagh
Ahbup! Its too late Xman, you're speaking after the fact. Your words prior to the fact told us all what you really think would have been "good" :lol:

You have been repeatedly royally bitchslapped in this thread...


Highly humorous. Thanks for hanging in there mate! :lol:

Yeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. :afro:

Re: OMG................

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 1:44 am
by piesman2011
Raiderdave wrote:
piesman2011 wrote:
You missed the second game eels it was 22k. This game was 23,690.
hmmmmm.......... what was yr prediction again ? :-k


40K

8-[


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

FMD :lol: :lol: :lol:
Getting closer dave but wrong again 38k. What was yours oh thats right you didnt have the guts to make a prediction. :wink:

Re: OMG................

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 7:45 am
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:
Ahbup! Its too late Xman, you're speaking after the fact. Your words prior to the fact told us all what you really think would have been "good" :lol:

You have been repeatedly royally bitchslapped in this thread...


Highly humorous. Thanks for hanging in there mate! :lol:

Yeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. :afro:
30k was good, 23k acceptable, 8k embarrassing in the extreme :wink:

Re: OMG................

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:30 am
by Stewie
23k for the AFL in non heartland, and 8k for the nRL in its heartland. Says it all really.

Re: OMG................

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:27 am
by Raiderdave
King-Eliagh wrote:
OMG........................................................ :shock: :shock: :shock:

This would have to be the biggest ,most demoralising AFL supporter group bashing by a single RL supporter that I've seen here at TF for some time!

And amusing too :lol: Jolly good show dave =D>

Its been hilarious watching the AFL goons pretending that alls well when during the week they all declared that the crowd would be above 30k and most declaring that 35-40k would be "good", just good. :lol: I know beaussie said to me about a week ago that it'll get 50k and that all giants members received free tickets to the Easter show on saturday so they could 'make a nice day of it' . But alas, it looks like they and all the other easter show goers who were offered freebies could not really give two shits about the game, as dave told us :lol:

Most amusing is the feeble attempts to save face using numbers and boring invalid comparisons which the delusional AFL troup have resorted to umpteen times b4, yes they have the combined creativity totalling the contents of the ass of a hippo with gastro. Yes feeble attempts using 'numbers' when 23k and their prior declarations of what would be a "passable" crowd is there for all to see :lol: You've already shown your hand you silly bimbos! :lol: Trying to save face now makes you alllook ridiculous :lol:

The consistent and relentless belting dave has dealt out to these AFL goons in denial looks fairly like this lil youtube vid would if looped and repeated 40 odd times.



Superb prediction dave and once again, thanks for providing us with accurate truthful and honest forecasts of AFL futures. =D>

thanks E
no probs

I just wish these assclowns had listened to me when I told them of the impending embarrasment that was to unfold at ANZ

I mean I was being nice
I could have let them continue with their predictions of up to 50K for the game, that our resident intellectually challenged village idiot .. spewie chimed in about. :lol: :lol: :lol: .. without warning

piesmans effort was almost as equally hilarious .... 40K 8-[
but he vommitted that effort out .. after .. I told them I had info that things were looking bleak :-k
it seems impossible where hes concerned but .... more the fool him !!

& Bearsy & his little forum bitch xman
well their efforts were as embarrasing as it gets since the shock of Sat

yep
Ol Raider ... rarely gets it wrong
maybe next time these singlet & tight short wearing dipshits will sit up straight & listen when I start a post with ..... " I have insider info " :cool:

Re: OMG................

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:33 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Of course the opening game of a club will be bigger. The next game was a more realistic idea of what crowds they should expect. You want me to bring up the titans crowds after their opening? :D

Well lets look then: round 1 2007, 42k for the titans v StGeorge. Next game vs Stgeorge was 26k

the first game was at suncorp you **** halfwit
the 2nd at Skilled

how the F were they going to get 42K into a ground that seats just 27K :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: OMG................

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:36 am
by Raiderdave
piesman2011 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
piesman2011 wrote:
You missed the second game eels it was 22k. This game was 23,690.
hmmmmm.......... what was yr prediction again ? :-k


40K

8-[


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

FMD :lol: :lol: :lol:
Getting closer dave but wrong again 38k. What was yours oh thats right you didnt have the guts to make a prediction. :wink:
I think mine was 25K ( somewhere in the crop dusters thread :wink: ) .... which was greeted with a chorous of laughing & chortling


whos laughing now dickhead ? :cool:

Re: OMG................

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 12:09 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Of course the opening game of a club will be bigger. The next game was a more realistic idea of what crowds they should expect. You want me to bring up the titans crowds after their opening? :D

Well lets look then: round 1 2007, 42k for the titans v StGeorge. Next game vs Stgeorge was 26k

the first game was at suncorp you **** halfwit
the 2nd at Skilled

how the F were they going to get 42K into a ground that seats just 27K :lol: :lol: :lol:
So the big problem for the titans is they don't play at suncorp? :-k

:lol:

Oh Dave you clown!

Re: OMG................

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 7:38 pm
by Pete_09
I have to agree with the Rugby League guys here, 23,000 is pretty bad considering the swanne won the flag last year.

Sydney you should get behind our national code, don't you feel left out???

Re: OMG................

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 7:58 pm
by Stewie
23,000 would be bad IF the Swans were hosting the match. You can't really blame them for not showing up considering everyone expected them to thrash the last placed Giants. 23,000 was also up on the 22,000 that went to the most recent Sydney Derby.