Page 6 of 8
Re: Dark days for AFL family
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 6:05 pm
by Striker
And how many drugs does WADA take in? Not as many as the ACC take in!
AFL, running scared.
Re: Dark days for AFL family
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 6:14 pm
by Stewie
Xman wrote:Stewie wrote:If you want to know what it would be like living in an Australia without rl, come visit SA. In 2012 with no rl games here, Adelaide was voted the countries safest city. Coincidence? I think not!
Raiderdave please tell me you're trolling when saying that Essendon will be kicked out of the comp in 2013. Hypothetically if they are found guilty and do get banned from the AFL for one year, does this mean the 5 nRL clubs who could also be found guilty will get booted out of the nRL for 1 year?
Unless they come out and own up by admitting guilt the ban is 2 years I believe. And I agree with Dave on this, Essendon if found guilty could be kicked out for 2 years. Doesn't bode well for the Nrl though.
Ahh my bad, 2 years. So we may lose Essendon for 2 years while the nRL may lose 5 teams for 2 years.
Re: Dark days for AFL family
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 6:16 pm
by Xman
Striker wrote:And how many drugs does WADA take in? Not as many as the ACC take in!
AFL, running scared.
What? WADA covers PEDs and illicit drugs.
Re: Dark days for AFL family
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 6:17 pm
by Striker
That's not all of the illegal drugs!
Re: Dark days for AFL family
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 6:17 pm
by Xman
Stewie wrote:Xman wrote:Stewie wrote:If you want to know what it would be like living in an Australia without rl, come visit SA. In 2012 with no rl games here, Adelaide was voted the countries safest city. Coincidence? I think not!
Raiderdave please tell me you're trolling when saying that Essendon will be kicked out of the comp in 2013. Hypothetically if they are found guilty and do get banned from the AFL for one year, does this mean the 5 nRL clubs who could also be found guilty will get booted out of the nRL for 1 year?
Unless they come out and own up by admitting guilt the ban is 2 years I believe. And I agree with Dave on this, Essendon if found guilty could be kicked out for 2 years. Doesn't bode well for the Nrl though.
Ahh my bad, 2 years. So we may lose Essendon for 2 years while the nRL may lose 5 teams for 2 years.
6 NRL clubs are under investigation and thats just PEDs. They also may have illegal betting issues
Re: Dark days for AFL family
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 6:17 pm
by Xman
Striker wrote:That's not all of the illegal drugs!
Says who?
Re: Dark days for AFL family
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 6:18 pm
by Striker
Says common sense!
Re: Dark days for AFL family
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 6:24 pm
by Xman
What the? The ASADA enforce WADA policy in Australia. These are the drugs that the ACC was investigating
Re: Dark days for AFL family
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 6:25 pm
by Striker
What about the drugs that WADA have NOTHING TO DO WITH? Or are you saying that the drugs that WADA don't cover are okay even if the ACC say they aren't??
Re: Dark days for AFL family
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 6:26 pm
by Xman
Striker wrote:What about the drugs that WADA have NOTHING TO DO WITH? Or are you saying that the drugs that WADA don't cover are okay even if the ACC say they aren't??
The drugs WADA don't care about arent banned...no issue
Re: Dark days for AFL family
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 6:28 pm
by Striker
YES, issue because they are criminally banned by law!!
Re: Dark days for AFL family
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 6:39 pm
by Xman
Striker wrote:YES, issue because they are criminally banned by law!!
Illegal drugs are covered under WADA.
Re: Dark days for AFL family
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 6:52 pm
by Xman
Stewie wrote:Xman wrote:Stewie wrote:If you want to know what it would be like living in an Australia without rl, come visit SA. In 2012 with no rl games here, Adelaide was voted the countries safest city. Coincidence? I think not!
Raiderdave please tell me you're trolling when saying that Essendon will be kicked out of the comp in 2013. Hypothetically if they are found guilty and do get banned from the AFL for one year, does this mean the 5 nRL clubs who could also be found guilty will get booted out of the nRL for 1 year?
Unless they come out and own up by admitting guilt the ban is 2 years I believe. And I agree with Dave on this, Essendon if found guilty could be kicked out for 2 years. Doesn't bode well for the Nrl though.
Ahh my bad, 2 years. So we may lose Essendon for 2 years while the nRL may lose 5 teams for 2 years.
9 news said Danks has just announced he is suing media outlets for 10m! Seems he's pretty sure of his innocence. This bodes well for Essendon if true.
Re: Dark days for AFL family
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 7:09 pm
by Striker
Xman wrote:Striker wrote:YES, issue because they are criminally banned by law!!
Illegal drugs are covered under WADA.
Not all of them. Prescription drugs given without a prescription are not covered by WADA.
Re: Dark days for AFL family
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 7:48 pm
by Xman
Striker wrote:Xman wrote:Striker wrote:YES, issue because they are criminally banned by law!!
Illegal drugs are covered under WADA.
Not all of them. Prescription drugs given without a prescription are not covered by WADA.
So the ACC are targeting prescription drugs, in case they are taken without a script.....
