Re: BS File #29: AFL Coaches have admitted not trying to win
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 2:20 pm
Exactly.
And MYOB, Striker.
And MYOB, Striker.
www.talkingfooty.com
https://www.talkingfooty.com/forums/
Xman I like your new word to effect results of the BS files to your own bias, "interpretation". You're using it wonderfully although your old word "context" was just as effective i must say. :>::Xman wrote:"in his own way" is pure interpretation. If he didn't say it youre interpreting what you want to hear. Bailey explained his comment and was cleared after investigation.King-Eliagh wrote:In hia own way Bailey was admitting that tanking occurred. Without his admissions the whole issue would not have come to the fore as it has.
Clear as day folks. Nothing you can say removes this fact.
Now Xman hurry up with my point!
The context of your comment was crystal clear fool!King-Eliagh wrote:Xman I like your new word to effect results of the BS files to your own bias, "interpretation". You're using it wonderfully although your old word "context" was just as effective i must say. :>::Xman wrote:"in his own way" is pure interpretation. If he didn't say it youre interpreting what you want to hear. Bailey explained his comment and was cleared after investigation.King-Eliagh wrote:In hia own way Bailey was admitting that tanking occurred. Without his admissions the whole issue would not have come to the fore as it has.
Clear as day folks. Nothing you can say removes this fact.
Now Xman hurry up with my point!
Please tell me in the BS file 31 how would you interpret a large percentage of a crowd to be?
No! You made the statement, so you make it public!TLPG wrote:And MYOB, Striker.
again, he made the claim, and without evidence which is easily shown, was absolute BS. This case is simple. They either said it or they didnt, irrespective of whether tanking exists or not. And we all know they didnt say it because the AFL would have acted on an admission like that by now.MarkZZZ wrote:Xman do it or dismiss it. Firstly BS points coming from a bias source are worth nothing. Secondly do you want to give one and then wear the egg on your face when it is confirmed after an investigation that it has occurred. You have to admit it doesn't look good from the recent revelations.
Xman wrote:again, he made the claim, and without evidence which is easily shown, was absolute BS. This case is simple. They either said it or they didnt, irrespective of whether tanking exists or not. And we all know they didnt say it because the AFL would have acted on an admission like that by now.MarkZZZ wrote:Xman do it or dismiss it. Firstly BS points coming from a bias source are worth nothing. Secondly do you want to give one and then wear the egg on your face when it is confirmed after an investigation that it has occurred. You have to admit it doesn't look good from the recent revelations.
if its happened then post it........MarkZZZ wrote:Xman wrote:again, he made the claim, and without evidence which is easily shown, was absolute BS. This case is simple. They either said it or they didnt, irrespective of whether tanking exists or not. And we all know they didnt say it because the AFL would have acted on an admission like that by now.MarkZZZ wrote:Xman do it or dismiss it. Firstly BS points coming from a bias source are worth nothing. Secondly do you want to give one and then wear the egg on your face when it is confirmed after an investigation that it has occurred. You have to admit it doesn't look good from the recent revelations.
Waffle, waffle, waffle. make a decision. Use a bit of common sence. You know it has happened, TLPG knows it has happened the coach has said it (doesn't take Einstein to understand it), neither of you will accept it and make excuses. Make a decision. BS point or not?
TLPG wrote:Exactly.
And MYOB, Striker.