Talking Footy

Xman you are quite the farce.

Now it seems the pair of you are taking somee offence to my statement. But please do realise, I'm simply dishing out my statements TLPG style now. He's a wikipedia editor - FACT, until he proves otherwise. :D

As I said earlier Xman. If TLPG is aloud to bandy out statements as fact such as his dunderbrain like racist chant without any evidence whatsoever, things will go pear shaped in here. Monkey see monkey do Xman. There's no avoiding it.

TLPG you should take a long look in the mirror young man

I have provided evidence of my accusations against you. You have chosen to ignore them by playing it as though you can't comprehend my statements (which is a stupid move on your part).

You have not provided a scrap of evidence to PROVE that I edited Wikipedia. The onus is on you to provide evidence.

King-Eliagh wrote:

Xman you are quite the farce.

Now it seems the pair of you are taking somee offence to my statement. But please do realise, I'm simply dishing out my statements TLPG style now. He's a wikipedia editor - FACT, until he proves otherwise. :D

As I said earlier Xman. If TLPG is aloud to bandy out statements as fact such as his dunderbrain like racist chant without any evidence whatsoever, things will go pear shaped in here. Monkey see monkey do Xman. There's no avoiding it.

TLPG you should take a long look in the mirror young man

you cant prove a negative dopey

provide proof or retract.

TLPG calling you a racist is an opinion. Your accusation is more serious and requires proof.

TLPG wrote:

I have provided evidence of my accusations against you. You have chosen to ignore them by playing it as though you can't comprehend my statements (which is a stupid move on your part).

You have not provided a scrap of evidence to PROVE that I edited Wikipedia. The onus is on you to provide evidence.

MarkZZZ provided enough evidence for me.

And the evidence you have provided for me being a racist has been accepted by noone. In fact it has been refuted by members in here. Who's stupid TLPG? Yoooooouuuuu are

Ps: if you wanna learn and act smarter pm me.

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Xman you are quite the farce.

Now it seems the pair of you are taking somee offence to my statement. But please do realise, I'm simply dishing out my statements TLPG style now. He's a wikipedia editor - FACT, until he proves otherwise. :D

As I said earlier Xman. If TLPG is aloud to bandy out statements as fact such as his dunderbrain like racist chant without any evidence whatsoever, things will go pear shaped in here. Monkey see monkey do Xman. There's no avoiding it.

TLPG you should take a long look in the mirror young man

you cant prove a negative dopey

provide proof or retract.

TLPG calling you a racist is an opinion. Your accusation is more serious and requires proof.

Oh so being a racist is less serious now than someone who falsely edits wikipedia? Now I've heard it all. Xman give yourself an uppercut you foolish buffoon.

I shall not refrain or retract my claims until TLPG starts retracting his. i.e. he is stating im a racist as fact not his opinion Xman you confused buffoon.

And if TLPG continues I shall continue Xman. And believe me, I have plenty more statements I can make about him

Objectivity Xman, life will always be difficult for you in here until you find some

Lets see. We have me quoting wiki that showed that Homebush was "inner west". We then have a quote from Wiki by TLPG stating that it was "west". I go to wiki and discover that the entry was amended just before TLPG makes the quote. What conclusion would you draw Xman??????? Be impartial here, remember you are wearing a mods hat and not siding with the AFL tribe on this one.

Yes excellent point Mark. I mean what are the chances?

MarkZZZ wrote:

Lets see. We have me quoting wiki that showed that Homebush was "inner west". We then have a quote from Wiki by TLPG stating that it was "west". I go to wiki and discover that the entry was amended just before TLPG makes the quote. What conclusion would you draw Xman??????? Be impartial here, remember you are wearing a mods hat and not siding with the AFL tribe on this one.

how would he even have access to editing a wiki page??

he's acknowledged he's edited them before Xman. I'm pretty certain anyone can edit wiki if they signup an account.

Is incorrectly editing wiki still more serious than racism in your opinion Xman?

Even without knowing how one can edit wiki you should still be ashamed of yourself here Xman

King-Eliagh wrote:

he's acknowledged he's edited them before Xman. I'm pretty certain anyone can edit wiki if they signup an account.

Is incorrectly editing wiki still more serious than racism in your opinion Xman?

Even without knowing how one can edit wiki you should still be ashamed of yourself here Xman

I'm not comparing the seriousness of the accused act. Im accounting for the fact that one is an accusation based on opinion and the other based on an act. if you have proof for the act then fair enough, but a coincidence doesnt cut it.

Just to correct Mark, I didn't even know about the change until I decided to look at his link - and I called him out on him misquoting it. I NEVER saw the page say "inner west". He should compare the time of the edit he accuses me of with the time that I said I would go and look at it - and he'll see that I said I would look at it AFTER the edit was already made!

I've already asked Beau for his help, and it will reveal that it WASN'T me! Not that I even have to, but just to make KE look like the liar he is.

I mean what are the chances of the incorrect edit being exactly the same as TLPGs argument and happening at exactly the same few days timeframe in which the argument took place

Give it up TLPG, you've been caught red handed.

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

he's acknowledged he's edited them before Xman. I'm pretty certain anyone can edit wiki if they signup an account.

Is incorrectly editing wiki still more serious than racism in your opinion Xman?

Even without knowing how one can edit wiki you should still be ashamed of yourself here Xman

I'm not comparing the seriousness of the accused act. Im accounting for the fact that one is an accusation based on opinion and the other based on an act. if you have proof for the act then fair enough, but a coincidence doesnt cut it.

Get your hand off it Xman. TLPG is not stating things as his opinion. He's claiming it as fact. I'm copying his exact actions. He set the precedent, address him and I might think about readressing my post...'might' because the evidence is so damning aint it? I mean what are the chances?

TLPG?

What I have since found out since then is that anyone can edit Wiki, you don't even have to sign up to wiki to have that capability. TLPG I did compare the time of the edit and the time of your quote and your quote shortly followed the edit. Beau is going to clear you? How is he going to do that? Does he know for a fact that it wasn't you? Does he know who did it? Did he do it and is he going to own up to doing it? Don't keep us in suspense.

Hmmm interesting questions there Mark. Quite thought provoking. I wouldnt put such an act past beaussie and I know he's quite determinedin defending GWS by stating homebush is in western sydney. Otherwise it could well have been Xman. Although the front runner in all this is definitely TLPG. All fingers must be pointed at him. He's prime suspect number one. Such damning evidence, even if it wasnt TLPG you just know he was involved.

If only your nieces and nephews knew how you have stooped so low TLPG Poor role modelling indeed.