Page 6 of 7
Re: Swans 14,048 Members / Storm Just 6,078 Members
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:00 pm
by Xman
Two can play at this game:
9K in Melbourne after 14 years of success!!!

The Suns already have more than this after one year of failure, and from a population of 1/8th!

Re: Swans 14,048 Members / Storm Just 6,078 Members
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:07 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Two can play at this game:
9K in Melbourne after 14 years of success!!!

The Suns already have more than this after one year of failure, and from a population of 1/8th!

so how many NSW based members did the Swans have in 1995....
answer
not many
the thuns have only 5k ticketed members .. a bigger smoke n mirrors excerise we are yet to see
oh wait
that title now goes to the Midgits
VFL.... all is not what it seems

Re: Swans 14,048 Members / Storm Just 6,078 Members
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:10 pm
by Xman
Show us a link for the 5k ticketted members for the Suns and I'll concede your point.
Prior to 1995 the Swans were atrocious for years. The storm on the other hand...they only have 15 ticketted members. That's all that turned out for their training run the other day!

Re: Swans 14,048 Members / Storm Just 6,078 Members
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:39 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Show us a link for the 5k ticketted members for the Suns and I'll concede your point.
Prior to 1995 the Swans were atrocious for years. The storm on the other hand...they only have 15 ticketted members. That's all that turned out for their training run the other day!

the attendance at the " free to ticketed members" NAB game is proof definitive
5K turned up thats about their number.
the Swans played in Finals in 1986 & 87 .... how were they travelling for members in 1988 ?
again
way behind where the Storm are today ...
way behind where the Storm were in 2010 .. & 2011 too
nuff said.

Re: Swans 14,048 Members / Storm Just 6,078 Members
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:56 am
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Show us a link for the 5k ticketted members for the Suns and I'll concede your point.
Prior to 1995 the Swans were atrocious for years. The storm on the other hand...they only have 15 ticketted members. That's all that turned out for their training run the other day!

the attendance at the " free to ticketed members" NAB game is proof definitive
5K turned up thats about their number.
the Swans played in Finals in 1986 & 87 .... how were they travelling for members in 1988 ?
again
way behind where the Storm are today ...
way behind where the Storm were in 2010 .. & 2011 too
nuff said.

And when they get 18k to their first home game, which is free entry to members, what will you say then genius!

Re: Swans 14,048 Members / Storm Just 6,078 Members
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 8:16 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Show us a link for the 5k ticketted members for the Suns and I'll concede your point.
Prior to 1995 the Swans were atrocious for years. The storm on the other hand...they only have 15 ticketted members. That's all that turned out for their training run the other day!

the attendance at the " free to ticketed members" NAB game is proof definitive
5K turned up thats about their number.
the Swans played in Finals in 1986 & 87 .... how were they travelling for members in 1988 ?
again
way behind where the Storm are today ...
way behind where the Storm were in 2010 .. & 2011 too
nuff said.

And when they get 18k to their first home game, which is free entry to members, what will you say then genius!

wot ... ?
wot 18K ? ...
wot free game for members ?
wot the hell are you gibbering about marcus

Re: Swans 14,048 Members / Storm Just 6,078 Members
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 8:19 am
by Xman
Keep up Dave. According to you if members get free access that indicates the number of their ticketted members. So whatever they get for a crowd in their first home game is their ticketted tally right? After all, members are free! LOL
Re: Swans 14,048 Members / Storm Just 6,078 Members
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:17 am
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Keep up Dave. According to you if members get free access that indicates the number of their ticketted members. So whatever they get for a crowd in their first home game is their ticketted tally right? After all, members are free! LOL
unlike the KNOB cup game
their first game isn't free though co.ckhead .....
wot a pelican

Re: Swans 14,048 Members / Storm Just 6,078 Members
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 12:31 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Keep up Dave. According to you if members get free access that indicates the number of their ticketted members. So whatever they get for a crowd in their first home game is their ticketted tally right? After all, members are free! LOL
unlike the KNOB cup game
their first game isn't free though co.ckhead .....
wot a pelican

Keep up Dave! The NAB cp is free for members and the public pays. The full season is free for members and the public pays. According to your rules whatever the Suns get to their games indicates their ticketted membership tally. Cool!
Re: Swans 14,048 Members / Storm Just 6,078 Members
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 12:57 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:Keep up Dave. According to you if members get free access that indicates the number of their ticketted members. So whatever they get for a crowd in their first home game is their ticketted tally right? After all, members are free! LOL
unlike the KNOB cup game
their first game isn't free though co.ckhead .....
wot a pelican

Keep up Dave! The NAB cp is free for members and the public pays. The full season is free for members and the public pays. According to your rules whatever the Suns get to their games indicates their ticketted membership tally. Cool!
the public pays & ticketed members didn't
so people who could get in for free .... couldn't be bothered to
is that what yr saying ?
oh dear
its even wosre then I thought
wanna go to a Knob Cup Game .. yr a member so its free
nuh
VFL.... doomed in QLD
Re: Swans 14,048 Members / Storm Just 6,078 Members
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 1:07 pm
by Xman
Suns >>>>> Titans.
Suck it up dopey.
Re: Swans 14,048 Members / Storm Just 6,078 Members
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 1:19 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:Suns >>>>> Titans.
Suck it up dopey.
Titans on fire in rnd 1.... a finals contender in 2012
good solid roster ... very much on the up
Thuns 2nd to last in 2012.. & they'd be thanking their stars for the midgits
cos it would be splinters again on the wooden spoon otherwise
a pack of bumbling ********* ... & thats being kind
hmmmmm
whos gunna win this one
marcus .... i think your shot yr load before you could get your daks down ............. again
geez I feel for yr missus
a dud in the sack .........

Re: Swans 14,048 Members / Storm Just 6,078 Members
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 1:50 pm
by Xman
Just going by the last valid comparison Dave. All you've got are practice matches! LOL
Re: Swans 22,208 Members / Storm Just 8,683 Members
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:01 pm
by Beaussie
Another day passes and hundreds more sign up for Swans membership.
Storm membership numbers on the other hand remain stagnant.
Re: Swans 22,208 Members / Storm Just 8,683 Members
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:26 pm
by Raiderdave
Beaussie wrote:Another day passes and hundreds more sign up for Swans membership.
Storm membership numbers on the other hand remain stagnant.
8,683... that figures a week old
& of course
the Swans only have about 14,500 members in NSW
good on em though
Bronze Medal for them
Gold to the Knights
Silver to Souths
hmmmmm
here come the Dragons .... looking for a medal
the Swans .... out of the placings
shame eh
