Talking Footy

NSWAFL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

I'd say its fun
don't give a rats A hole what you think about it

Being a bigot is fun huh? No wonder there's so much violence in the world, with an attitude like that.

As for your last remark, I did speculate that there was some common sense amongst your fans knowing that a fair fight is better and more fun than a dirty one. But then you don't want to know that because you don't have the intelligence to fight fair.

its rigged .... quite obviously

& the reason there is violence in the world .. is because there are f wits like you in it
you inspire it
you attract it

remove you
remove violence .............

Wrong. You are trying to justify violence and it has no justification.

Grow up.

There arent anywhere near 30 regular posters in this forum. Clearly the poll is rigged. If Xman cant see this, he's blind.

King-Eliagh wrote:

There arent anywhere near 30 regular posters in this forum. Clearly the poll is rigged. If Xman cant see this, he's blind.

they'd be 10 regular / semi regular leaguies E

no way in hell theres 20 derpballers

rigged so obviously its ridiculous

No it's not rigged. I PMed a number of inactive members asking for their help. I guess some of them responded although I can't say for sure because I have received no replies saying they have done so.

"inactive" members

Clearcut riggin goin on in these parts. The poll is clearly not a accurate account of active members' view. Thanks for the evidence AFLNSW

What's being rigged? Different members of this forum are expressing their view by voting? How is that rigged? I can't control how they vote you know!

I call on the " regular " posters in here only

to be allowed to vote out in the open ...
thats a fairer way to decide this

anything else reeks of underhanded .. seedy ... rigging

ex-members who haven't posted in ages have no right if they no longer participate in this forum

They have every right! They are members and you have no right to slap on such a limitation!

Xman wrote:

I would say using personally abusive terms on a forum is gutless.

I agree.
Generally, abuse is destructive to the fighting process culminating in a pure abuse loop
that renders the original post completely useless.
It seems completely disjointed IMO when people demand not be penalised for abuse but
expect other procedures like demanding links to references to be upheld.
IMO, if we had a poll for demanding links with references that would be overwhelmingly supported.
Irrestpective of all the niceties of above there is a legal aspect to all websites and we should all respect that.

So with that last bit in mind, let's see legal evidence that "native" is a racist term. Thanks, Cos! Well said!

yes ... lets not upset Victorians

but call the indigenous people of our nation anything we like

Talking Footy .... a circus , a haven for racist bogans .. or AFL fans .. same diff

a disgrace

No you can't, imbecile! I've already avoided the obvious terms that ARE racist and you know what they are!

NSWAFL wrote:

No you can't, imbecile! I've already avoided the obvious terms that ARE racist and you know what they are!

racist ....

NSWAFL wrote:

So with that last bit in mind, let's see legal evidence that "native" is a racist term. Thanks, Cos! Well said!

Almost anything that references or distinguishes people is a racist term.
But it is not a racial abuse term until used in a derogatory manner.
A "native" is a native of a country pure and simple.
"you're acting like a native" could be seen as a racist slur but observing that
some natives in a park appear to be drinking is not.
A word like "****" is unambiguously racial abuse since it referes to a group of people in a negative way.
Some words like "black" or "********" were borderline acceptable but are now clearly unacceptable.