Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Which is the best football code? Here you can have it out with other football fans.
Post Reply

Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Poll ended at Sun Jan 22, 2012 9:38 am

Yes
20
65%
No
11
35%
 
Total votes: 31

User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Post by Raiderdave »

NSWAFL wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
I'd say its fun
don't give a rats A hole what you think about it :wink:
Being a bigot is fun huh? No wonder there's so much violence in the world, with an attitude like that.

As for your last remark, I did speculate that there was some common sense **** your fans knowing that a fair fight is better and more fun than a dirty one. But then you don't want to know that because you don't have the intelligence to fight fair.

its rigged .... quite obviously

& the reason there is violence in the world .. is because there are f wits like you in it
you inspire it
you attract it

remove you
remove violence ............. :wink:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
NSWAFL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2402
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:48 pm
Team: Sydney Hills Eagles
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Post by NSWAFL »

Wrong. You are trying to justify violence and it has no justification.

Grow up.
User avatar
King-Eliagh
Coach
Coach
Posts: 12787
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
Team: Parramatta
Location:
Has thanked: 16 times
Been liked: 11 times

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Post by King-Eliagh »

There arent anywhere near 30 regular posters in this forum. Clearly the poll is rigged. If Xman cant see this, he's blind.
Image

xman wrote:
KE, why is an even comp important?
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Post by Raiderdave »

King-Eliagh wrote:
There arent anywhere near 30 regular posters in this forum. Clearly the poll is rigged. If Xman cant see this, he's blind.
they'd be 10 regular / semi regular leaguies E

no way in hell theres 20 derpballers

rigged so obviously its ridiculous [-( [-( [-X [-X [-X [-X
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
NSWAFL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2402
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:48 pm
Team: Sydney Hills Eagles
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Post by NSWAFL »

No it's not rigged. I PMed a number of inactive members asking for their help. I guess some of them responded although I can't say for sure because I have received no replies saying they have done so.
User avatar
King-Eliagh
Coach
Coach
Posts: 12787
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
Team: Parramatta
Location:
Has thanked: 16 times
Been liked: 11 times

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Post by King-Eliagh »

"inactive" :lol: members [-X

Clearcut riggin goin on in these parts. The poll is clearly not a accurate account of active members' view. Thanks for the evidence AFLNSW :lol:
Image

xman wrote:
KE, why is an even comp important?
NSWAFL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2402
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:48 pm
Team: Sydney Hills Eagles
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Post by NSWAFL »

What's being rigged? Different members of this forum are expressing their view by voting? How is that rigged? I can't control how they vote you know!
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Post by Raiderdave »

I call on the " regular " posters in here only

to be allowed to vote out in the open ...
thats a fairer way to decide this

anything else reeks of underhanded .. seedy ... rigging

ex-members who haven't posted in ages have no right if they no longer participate in this forum
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
NSWAFL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2402
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:48 pm
Team: Sydney Hills Eagles
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Post by NSWAFL »

They have every right! They are members and you have no right to slap on such a limitation!
User avatar
cos789
Coach
Coach
Posts: 3276
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Post by cos789 »

Xman wrote:
I would say using personally abusive terms on a forum is gutless.
I agree.
Generally, abuse is destructive to the fighting process culminating in a pure abuse loop
that renders the original post completely useless.
It seems completely disjointed IMO when people demand not be penalised for abuse but
expect other procedures like demanding links to references to be upheld.
IMO, if we had a poll for demanding links with references that would be overwhelmingly supported.
Irrestpective of all the niceties of above there is a legal aspect to all websites and we should all respect that.
Nice try Cos.
NSWAFL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2402
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:48 pm
Team: Sydney Hills Eagles
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Post by NSWAFL »

So with that last bit in mind, let's see legal evidence that "native" is a racist term. Thanks, Cos! Well said!
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Post by Raiderdave »

yes ... lets not upset Victorians

but call the indigenous people of our nation anything we like

Talking Footy .... a circus , a haven for racist bogans .. or AFL fans .. same diff

a disgrace [-X [-X [-X [-X
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
NSWAFL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2402
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:48 pm
Team: Sydney Hills Eagles
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Post by NSWAFL »

No you can't, imbecile! I've already avoided the obvious terms that ARE racist and you know what they are!
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Post by Raiderdave »

NSWAFL wrote:
No you can't, imbecile! I've already avoided the obvious terms that ARE racist and you know what they are!
racist .... [-X [-X [-X
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
cos789
Coach
Coach
Posts: 3276
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Is the term "*******" unnacceptable for this board?

Post by cos789 »

NSWAFL wrote:
So with that last bit in mind, let's see legal evidence that "native" is a racist term. Thanks, Cos! Well said!
Almost anything that references or distinguishes people is a racist term.
But it is not a racial abuse term until used in a derogatory manner.
A "native" is a native of a country pure and simple.
"you're acting like a native" could be seen as a racist slur but observing that
some natives in a park appear to be drinking is not.
A word like "****" is unambiguously racial abuse since it referes to a group of people in a negative way.
Some words like "black" or "********" were borderline acceptable but are now clearly unacceptable.
Nice try Cos.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 9 guests