Page 6 of 16

Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 7:23 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
You corrected nothing of the sort, your goal post removal business must be thriving.

Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 7:29 pm
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
You corrected nothing of the sort, your goal post removal business must be thriving.
I originally said fudged, which I said was deliberate. When challenged I said the the figures were misleading which could be incidental.

Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 7:34 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Same meaning, different words.

Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 7:43 pm
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Same meaning, different words.
In my explanation of use of the term "misleading" I said it means the figures claimed were different but not necessarily deliberately so.

I conceded the point!

Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 8:34 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Yay, another win to me :)

Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 8:45 pm
by NSWAFL
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
No, I'm not proving nothing because you let your girlfriends post what they like and never ask them for proof.

And when we RL fans ask them for proof, their posts remain and you don't make them prove anything.

You're a biased lttle bastard that's for sure.
Right, that being the case whenever Parra mentions pet memberships again that post should be deleted on sight. Until he proves it.

Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 8:54 pm
by NSWAFL
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Yay, another win to me :)
A rarity.

Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 8:56 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Yeah, that's why I said another #-o

Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 8:57 pm
by NSWAFL
Oh let's have a party then! I could count the number of wins you've had on one hand.

Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:04 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
I can count 20+ threads where I've left you bleeding and busted open, been more fun than a Nick Ringworm peewee party.

Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:26 pm
by Xman
14 minutes left para

Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:58 pm
by Raiderdave
NSWAFL wrote:
Well? For a club that's new and presently inactive that's pretty good! Once they start playing in the NAB cup the numbers will amp up.
the Thuns had about 12K at this time last year & half of their members didn't come from Canberra
the Gold Coast is a city of 600K
Western Sydney has more people then Brisbane

the Thuns were new also ... whats the issue here with the midgits

whats going on with the ... tsunami :-k

Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 10:09 pm
by cos789
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
No, I'm not proving nothing .
For once I agree with you.

Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 10:34 pm
by NSWAFL
Raiderdave wrote:
NSWAFL wrote:
Well? For a club that's new and presently inactive that's pretty good! Once they start playing in the NAB cup the numbers will amp up.
the Thuns had about 12K at this time last year & half of their members didn't come from Canberra
the Gold Coast is a city of 600K
Western Sydney has more people then Brisbane

the Thuns were new also ... whats the issue here with the midgits

whats going on with the ... tsunami :-k
Who said anything about a tsunami? You're making it up as you go, Dave.

Re: 3,749 Members for GWS / 3,060 Members for Titans

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 10:39 pm
by Xman
NSWAFL wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
NSWAFL wrote:
Well? For a club that's new and presently inactive that's pretty good! Once they start playing in the NAB cup the numbers will amp up.
the Thuns had about 12K at this time last year & half of their members didn't come from Canberra
the Gold Coast is a city of 600K
Western Sydney has more people then Brisbane

the Thuns were new also ... whats the issue here with the midgits

whats going on with the ... tsunami :-k
Who said anything about a tsunami? You're making it up as you go, Dave.
Raiderdave's tsunami has been shown to be one comment from dipper and paraphrasing of Dermott.