Talking Footy

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

You'll be back in nappies within 4 years?

You've got proof theyre a certainty in 4 years? I've heard the NRL have feigned expansion before.

Where? Proof please.

They said no to expansion in 2006, by 2007 we had the Titans.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Where? Proof please.

They said no to expansion in 2006, by 2007 we had the Titans.

So they haven't promised expansion and backed out before?

When did they promise expansion?

Got a link?

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

When did they promise expansion?

Got a link?

Just saying what I'd heard. Not saying it was true.

You got any firm word on the reds?

No, no one knows until the IC is up and running, it's their decision, not Gallop the News LMD muppets.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

No, no one knows.

You mean, you don't know anything put you put it out there anyway.
Pathetic.

cos789 wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

No, no one knows.

You mean, you don't know anything put you put it out there anyway.
Pathetic.

Derp!, Spit it out old man moisturiser, you can do it.

Put you put what Sara?

Where do I put put it Sara.

Is your old pissnwind bag full again?


No worries old chump, I'll get help.

Hey nurse, nurse Vlad, you there?

Seems cuzzy Sara's bag is full of pissnwind again, could you empty it before he explodes?

Nurse Vlad, where art thou?

Right there, changing your nappy. What a sook. Gets exposed and won't admit to simply speculating which is the main reason why we aren't calling on your post to be deleted like you do us.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

When did they promise expansion?

Got a link?

As if the NRL can even contemplate expansion with no tv deal as yet and 15 of the 16 current clubs running at a loss.

Xman wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

We'll wait for that answer when the NRL expands.

Can't wait to see some of you blouses cry.

We'll all be back in nappies by then.

you'll be in nappies in 2015 ?

Perth Reds & Brisbane Bombers in 2015
nice

As if the people of Perth even want to see a return of RL after they way they were treated last time by your code. As for Brisbane Bombers, a name change will be required no doubt about that.

Again though, how can the NRL even think about expansion when 15 of the current 16 clubs run at a loss.

''What I do know is that having 15 of 16 [clubs] losing money is not sustainable in the long term. The days of leagues clubs putting their hands in their pockets have gone. They are not going, they are gone.''

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... z1bvJXC0Kd

Beaussie wrote:

As if the people of Perth even want to see a return of RL after they way they were treated last time by your code. As for Brisbane Bombers, a name change will be required no doubt about that.

Again though, how can the NRL even think about expansion when 15 of the current 16 clubs run at a loss.

''What I do know is that having 15 of 16 [clubs] losing money is not sustainable in the long term. The days of leagues clubs putting their hands in their pockets have gone. They are not going, they are gone.''

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... z1bvJXC0Kd

perth reds .. can't wait

& Essendon had their nads handed to them by the Brisbane Bombers lawyers

wooohooooo

Raiderdave wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

As if the people of Perth even want to see a return of RL after they way they were treated last time by your code. As for Brisbane Bombers, a name change will be required no doubt about that.

Again though, how can the NRL even think about expansion when 15 of the current 16 clubs run at a loss.

''What I do know is that having 15 of 16 [clubs] losing money is not sustainable in the long term. The days of leagues clubs putting their hands in their pockets have gone. They are not going, they are gone.''

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... z1bvJXC0Kd

perth reds .. can't wait

& Essendon had their nads handed to them by the Brisbane Bombers lawyers

wooohooooo

Can't wait? Youll have to. For quite a few years yet.