Talking Footy

Topper wrote:

Brendan Fevola. From Carlton and Brisbane.

Sack because he exposed himself, not because of a alcohol ban, otherwise he would not of even made it to brisbane
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/AFL/l ... 5915882855

Fevola still faces a Queensland Police investigation into allegations he exposed himself to a mother-of-four, and the AFL hasn't ruled out acting on their own investigation even if the police clear him of criminal behaviour.

The troubled forward was yesterday suspended indefinitely by the Brisbane Lions as police and the AFL investigate allegations he indecently exposed himself to a 38-year-old mother of four at 1pm on Saturday in a suburban Brisbane park.

The woman's children were about 50m away from the alleged incident.

Seething AFL chiefs yesterday explored options of deregistering Fevola, but have vowed to wait until the conclusion of a Queensland Police investigation before acting.

Topper wrote:

It's not a blanket ban because the AFL leave it to the clubs. And all 18 have bans in place of their own volition.

Where is the NRL's ban?

proof of this then ...........

Raiderdave wrote:

Topper wrote:

It's not a blanket ban because the AFL leave it to the clubs. And all 18 have bans in place of their own volition.

Where is the NRL's ban?

proof of this then ...........
again
shouldn't be hard if true

which it isn't
so should be quite difficult .......

Fevola was sacked for being drunk. The exposure issue is a police matter and nothing to do with the club.

I ask again - where is the NRL's ban?

Topper wrote:

Fevola was sacked for being drunk. The exposure issue is a police matter and nothing to do with the club.

I ask again - where is the NRL's ban?

wheres the AFL's .... you say its there

it isn't

but you say it is

you haven't been able to provide a shred of proof to back up this utter BS
& I wonder why

Club policy details are not available to the public. Fevola was a victim of the policy. That's all you need to know that it exists.

Topper wrote:

Club policy details are not available to the public. Fevola was a victim of the policy. That's all you need to know that it exists.

oh how convenient

I call BS

end of story

I would expect that from an unintelligent fool like you. Do explain what happened to Fevola and more importantly what policy was at the bottom of it to get out of this one.

Topper wrote:

I would expect that from an unintelligent fool like you. Do explain what happened to Fevola and more importantly what policy was at the bottom of it to get out of this one.

forget Fevola ... so what ... Carney got sacked too for Drinking

you said all AFL clubs ban alcohol .... its a policy don't cha know
thats what you said

I called BS

it appears thats exactly what your statement is ... & this would be consistent with most things you post

Carney was re-instated and remains a player now. Fevola is done. So don't forget him because the NRL doesn't have the policies in place to be able to do what Carlton and Brisbane did, and the other 16 clubs refuse to recruit him because of the same policy.

Topper wrote:

Carney was re-instated and remains a player now. Fevola is done. So don't forget him because the NRL doesn't have the policies in place to be able to do what Carlton and Brisbane did, and the other 16 clubs refuse to recruit him because of the same policy.

Fevola is a has been hack
thats why he's done & theres nothing more to it ... if he were 23 & at the height of his career like Carney is

he'd be playing somewhere ..... just like Carney is

No he wouldn't. He'd be done.

Topper wrote:

No he wouldn't. He'd be done.

no he wouldn't .... he'd be snapped up in a second , but isn't because he is a past it hack & he's a trouble maker
thats the only hesitation clubs have with him although theres clubs still weighing up signing him up .. GWS scumbags being the latest I think
he'd go down well at that stench ridden cespool club

he isn't banned any longer ...

there is no ban on alcohol in AFL clubs
& there never has been

what you wrote was utter nonsense
but par for the course where you are concerned..........

You don't know that and I do. Fevola would be done no matter how old he is.

Topper wrote:

You don't know that and I do. Fevola would be done no matter how old he is.

you don't know anything

this being abundantly clear to all of us