Talking Footy

Goldfish are gonna be goldfish are gonna be goldfish. All hope is lost Lololololololololololol.

pussycat wrote: Tue Aug 29, 2017 8:43 pm

NlolRL wrote: Tue Aug 29, 2017 8:26 pm

Terry wrote: Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:58 pm

Back into the goldfish bowl for a few more laps eh pal?????? I don't care about isolation. Get Gilligan and Maryanne to change your scheduling or suck it up like a man. 50k and 61k is snake belly level. That's the fact's.

well if 300k watch a sport on a Saturday night the vast majority will watch the best match. This will leave fans of the sides in the remaining game watching only, hence the low figure. If the games were shown on their own the ratings would be 150k plus

I dont care that we have games run concurrently. It's hilarious you dont see the difference between isolated and concurrent games though

And its hilarious that you cant work out that you lose a lot less on your Pay TV and gain much more with FTA matches being shown into there home states.

We've already been through this. Concurrent games are a far bigger disadvantage for ratings averages and totals than the advantage of targeted games.

Terry wrote: Tue Aug 29, 2017 8:45 pm

Goldfish are gonna be goldfish are gonna be goldfish. All hope is lost Lololololololololololol.

same could be said with you and your constant use of the gold fish BS

Woops......there goes another 90 seconds around the bowl. What did I say?? Damn can't remember. Oh and what about isolation?????? Lololololololololololololol. Now for another lap.

Terry wrote: Tue Aug 29, 2017 9:15 pm

Woops......there goes another 90 seconds around the bowl. What did I say?? Damn can't remember. Oh and what about isolation?????? Lololololololololololololol. Now for another lap.

if you dont want to engage in the topic then dont. But Im not ignoring a major factor because you dont like it

pussycat wrote: Tue Aug 29, 2017 8:43 pm

NlolRL wrote: Tue Aug 29, 2017 8:26 pm

Terry wrote: Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:58 pm

Back into the goldfish bowl for a few more laps eh pal?????? I don't care about isolation. Get Gilligan and Maryanne to change your scheduling or suck it up like a man. 50k and 61k is snake belly level. That's the fact's.

well if 300k watch a sport on a Saturday night the vast majority will watch the best match. This will leave fans of the sides in the remaining game watching only, hence the low figure. If the games were shown on their own the ratings would be 150k plus

I dont care that we have games run concurrently. It's hilarious you dont see the difference between isolated and concurrent games though

And its hilarious that you cant work out that you lose a lot less on your Pay TV and gain much more with FTA matches being shown into there home states.

This


He rants on & on about what they lose by having games on at the same time yet ignores what they gain by broadcasting into home markets .

And its hilarious that you cant work out that you lose a lot less on your Pay TV and gain much more with FTA matches being shown into there home states.

LOL wrote:

been through this. Concurrent games are a far bigger disadvantage for ratings averages and totals than the
advantage of targeted games

We have seems you remember it differently to me.

AFLcrap1 wrote: Tue Aug 29, 2017 10:12 pm

pussycat wrote: Tue Aug 29, 2017 8:43 pm

NlolRL wrote: Tue Aug 29, 2017 8:26 pm

well if 300k watch a sport on a Saturday night the vast majority will watch the best match. This will leave fans of the sides in the remaining game watching only, hence the low figure. If the games were shown on their own the ratings would be 150k plus

I dont care that we have games run concurrently. It's hilarious you dont see the difference between isolated and concurrent games though

And its hilarious that you cant work out that you lose a lot less on your Pay TV and gain much more with FTA matches being shown into there home states.

This


He rants on & on about what they lose by having games on at the same time yet ignores what they gain by broadcasting into home markets .

I think it depends. If Collingwood v say Carlton was shown into the Gold Coast I suspect it would get higher ratings than the suns game if it were on at the same time and all. But to promote AFL and the suns they show the suns game. Of course, an Adelaide game will get more than a bulldogs v north game in Adelaide .

All I will say is,

there is a reason the AFL Schedule this way>>
and the Networks were more than happy to continue this way..

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 10:40 am

All I will say is,

there is a reason the AFL Schedule this way>>
and the Networks were more than happy to continue this way..

Yep
They can deny all they want
But the AFL TV schedule is all about maximising viewers

Bahahaha
Yeah games in isolation, games over lapping, games played simultaneously & early afternoon games

As oppose to nrlol aimed at prime time, rarely played at the same time, exclusive games etc

The but it's from you lot just keep getting more pathetic

Jesus h
The same shit over & over
You've been shown over & over how wrong you are
Just to enlighten you once again

Fri nite prime time ..& wow ..the AFL has a game same time as the NRL...you never mention that
WHY?
Sat night wow AFL on at night on FTA
Sun arvo both codes have a game leading into the news on FTA.

& you keep insinuating that the AFL has early afternoon game a& the NRL doesn't.
Lol
Every Sat
3pm
Sun 2 pm
Or if warriors are playing at home sometimes 12 noon game in AUST.

You keep posting utter shit ..with NFI about the NRl .

AFLcrap1 wrote: Tue Aug 29, 2017 10:12 pm

pussycat wrote: Tue Aug 29, 2017 8:43 pm

NlolRL wrote: Tue Aug 29, 2017 8:26 pm

well if 300k watch a sport on a Saturday night the vast majority will watch the best match. This will leave fans of the sides in the remaining game watching only, hence the low figure. If the games were shown on their own the ratings would be 150k plus

I dont care that we have games run concurrently. It's hilarious you dont see the difference between isolated and concurrent games though

And its hilarious that you cant work out that you lose a lot less on your Pay TV and gain much more with FTA matches being shown into there home states.

This


He rants on & on about what they lose by having games on at the same time yet ignores what they gain by broadcasting into home markets .

Wrong. Ive discussed the pros and cons many times if you pulled your head out of your arse to look. But the fact remains concurrent games is more detrimental to ratings than beneficial.

So why do they do it? Well i dont think its feasible to show 27 hours of AFL in a weekend without some overlap

Why do you think the AFL created more overlap problems by introducing two new teams if the Pro's aren't greater than the cons?

the question that needs to be asked..

KANGAS V LIONS >>>>
(who the hell would of watched this $hitty game if it was the only game in that timeslot.

PORT v SUNS (same as above)

the figures would of been CRAP

AFL do it smartly, with there scheduling,

It is the reason why it is done>>
if they could get bigger ratings to show the networks they would be doing it..

pussycat wrote: Wed Aug 30, 2017 3:07 pm

Why do you think the AFL created more overlap problems by introducing two new teams if the Pro's aren't greater than the cons?

stupid question. More matches = more $$$