Talking Footy

No doubt
Lol
Lol
Is that the word on the street BEA?

Terry wrote: Sun Jul 30, 2017 8:09 pm

It seems GWS rated 9k in Sydney on Fox yesterday. Just saying. Any comments fumblers??

So more people turned up to the game, than watching it on tv in nsw!

Lol go the accuracy in the ratings

Terry wrote: Sun Jul 30, 2017 8:09 pm

It seems GWS rated 9k in Sydney on Fox yesterday. Just saying. Any comments fumblers??

No FTA ratings provided. That aside, Giants have been in form slump and were playing lowly Freo

But but but but but

leagueiscrap wrote: Sun Jul 30, 2017 8:47 pm

Terry wrote: Sun Jul 30, 2017 8:09 pm

It seems GWS rated 9k in Sydney on Fox yesterday. Just saying. Any comments fumblers??

So more people turned up to the game, than watching it on tv in nsw!

Lol go the accuracy in the ratings

If that was an NRL game

pussycat wrote: Sun Jul 30, 2017 9:29 pm

leagueiscrap wrote: Sun Jul 30, 2017 8:47 pm

Terry wrote: Sun Jul 30, 2017 8:09 pm

It seems GWS rated 9k in Sydney on Fox yesterday. Just saying. Any comments fumblers??

So more people turned up to the game, than watching it on tv in nsw!

Lol go the accuracy in the ratings

If that was an NRL game

It would be the same
So more people made the effort paying and turning up to a game than watching it for free on tv!

Lol

But but but Friday Friday. Why are we bothering to count the other days

pussycat wrote: Sun Jul 30, 2017 9:40 pm

But but but Friday Friday. Why are we bothering to count the other days

youre carrying on about the Giants STV ratings for Sydney only?

Theyre comparable to FTA ratings for the NRL in Melb, Adel and Perth combined

Terry wrote: Sun Jul 30, 2017 8:09 pm

It seems GWS rated 9k in Sydney on Fox yesterday. Just saying. Any comments fumblers??

What about fta ? I assume it would not be much higher. Also 9 thousand is more than the giants would have got 10 years ago.

Fred wrote: Sun Jul 30, 2017 9:59 pm

Terry wrote: Sun Jul 30, 2017 8:09 pm

It seems GWS rated 9k in Sydney on Fox yesterday. Just saying. Any comments fumblers??

What about fta ? I assume it would not be much higher. Also 9 thousand is more than the giants would have got 10 years ago.

Wow!!!! Very, very good point Fredo. Yep......9k on Fox is more than the western fumblers would have got 10 years ago. Because .........ummmmmmmm..........10 years ago there was no great western fumblers.....lolololololololol. Yep 9k will beats zero every time Freddy.....lololololololololololol........you're all over it pal!!!!!

Fair dinkum!!!!!

Yep = that was my whole point. You walked right into that one Terry.



And I thought it would be you as well - predictable to a fault. You make this too easy sometimes. You almost wrote word for word what I thought you would but you did leave out "dill".

Just read Mr TV. Gee there were some poor numbers for fumbleball on Fox over the weekend. What's going on fumblers??

thats what happens when games go up against each other on fox, and are also on FTA at the same time. What, you think just because two games are shown at the same time the audience should miraculously double?

If you want to see the true comparison of both codes on PTV look at games shown in isolation. Have the NRL even won one Friday night on fox yet?

The 'ol isolation argument. You bewdy........haven't heard this since.......ummmmmm......at least Saturday lolololololololol.

Actually I'm comparing like for like time slots and scheduling in the AFL over the whole season. And over the weekend there were some very, very poor results. How do you explain that??

All Matches, are simulcast these days LOL's. And no one has 2 FTA matches on at the Same time. AFL shows the matches in different states.