Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Keep up knucklehead!

There was a claim made that there are cumulative figures for TV ratings which cover every single part of Australia. I asked for a link to prove these exist. What, are we just going to take your word for it?

I never claimed it in first place... knucklehead

You gave a BS respondse to a post of mine that asked for a link

Knucklehead

I gave a balanced ... accurate ...& informative response to a ranting .. hysterical ... folded arms feeting stamping ... hold your breath til we agree with you
post like you always do
that you didn't like

gee have a cry... kucklehead

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

I never claimed it in first place... knucklehead

You gave a BS respondse to a post of mine that asked for a link

Knucklehead

I gave a balanced ... accurate ...& informative response to a ranting .. hysterical ... folded arms feeting stamping ... hold your breath til we agree with you
post like you always do
that you didn't like

gee have a cry... kucklehead

still no link burp machine (aka knucklehead)?

Come back when you can verify your regional figures are correct and cover all of Australia.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

You gave a BS respondse to a post of mine that asked for a link

Knucklehead

I gave a balanced ... accurate ...& informative response to a ranting .. hysterical ... folded arms feeting stamping ... hold your breath til we agree with you
post like you always do
that you didn't like

gee have a cry... kucklehead

still no link burp machine (aka knucklehead)?

Come back when you can verify your regional figures are correct and cover all of Australia.

you'd think I corrolate the Figures myself

you think anyone bar flogball fans in soggy biscuit sessions will believe a ranting tanty chucker like you
ova reputable gatherer's of ratings like Oztam... neilsen & Repucom

I think not knucklehead

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

I gave a balanced ... accurate ...& informative response to a ranting .. hysterical ... folded arms feeting stamping ... hold your breath til we agree with you
post like you always do
that you didn't like

gee have a cry... kucklehead

still no link burp machine (aka knucklehead)?

Come back when you can verify your regional figures are correct and cover all of Australia.

you'd think I corrolate the Figures myself

you think anyone bar flogball fans in soggy biscuit sessions will believe a ranting tanty chucker like you
ova reputable gatherer's of ratings like Oztam... neilsen & Repucom

I think not knucklehead

Oh dear...

no one is disputing that neilsen and reucom arent reputable. What we are disputing is how thorough their sampling is. So if you can show us a link that shows they are accurate and thorough please do.

Still waiting for an answer on the 10m behind to 15m in front over the last 5 years. You know in sport/business/politics that would be called a significant trend.

You dont need a link to show that there are many more people living in regional NSW/QLD/ACT than in the other states. Even using Topper maths the AFL only has a 15% average on the 5 city metro ratings and that is excluding SOO and Tests. What do you reckon happens when the regional do get added -the NRL strolls to the lead.

Thee view of the AFL crew is like you have an election but you dont count a couple of the outlying poll booths because you weren't there to do the counting.

enarelle wrote:

Still waiting for an answer on the 10m behind to 15m in front over the last 5 years. You know in sport/business/politics that would be called a significant trend.

You dont need a link to show that there are many more people living in regional NSW/QLD/ACT than in the other states. Even using Topper maths the AFL only has a 15% average on the 5 city metro ratings and that is excluding SOO and Tests. What do you reckon happens when the regional do get added -the NRL strolls to the lead.

Thee view of the AFL crew is like you have an election but you dont count a couple of the outlying poll booths because you weren't there to do the counting.

I've already told you that the AFL began airing on two different digitial channels, on both ch7 and ch10, within the last few years. The NRL has only been shown on Nine.

Ive seen a number of media reports claiming the AFL aduiences had reduced. However closer inspection showed the reports completely ignored the ratings for the second digitial channels. Ive even seen OZ tam figures quoting only ch10 figures and ignoring 1HD which made up about 1/5th of the audience.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

still no link burp machine (aka knucklehead)?

Come back when you can verify your regional figures are correct and cover all of Australia.

you'd think I corrolate the Figures myself

you think anyone bar flogball fans in soggy biscuit sessions will believe a ranting tanty chucker like you
ova reputable gatherer's of ratings like Oztam... neilsen & Repucom

I think not knucklehead

Oh dear...

no one is disputing that neilsen and reucom arent reputable. What we are disputing is how thorough their sampling is. So if you can show us a link that shows they are accurate and thorough please do.

you think a reputable company would allow faulty stats with their name attached to them to be published ?

no

case closed

Xman wrote:

enarelle wrote:

Still waiting for an answer on the 10m behind to 15m in front over the last 5 years. You know in sport/business/politics that would be called a significant trend.

You dont need a link to show that there are many more people living in regional NSW/QLD/ACT than in the other states. Even using Topper maths the AFL only has a 15% average on the 5 city metro ratings and that is excluding SOO and Tests. What do you reckon happens when the regional do get added -the NRL strolls to the lead.

Thee view of the AFL crew is like you have an election but you dont count a couple of the outlying poll booths because you weren't there to do the counting.

I've already told you that the AFL began airing on two different digitial channels, on both ch7 and ch10, within the last few years. The NRL has only been shown on Nine.

Ive seen a number of media reports claiming the AFL aduiences had reduced. However closer inspection showed the reports completely ignored the ratings for the second digitial channels. Ive even seen OZ tam figures quoting only ch10 figures and ignoring 1HD which made up about 1/5th of the audience.

rubbish
nowhere does it say anything of the sort

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

you'd think I corrolate the Figures myself

you think anyone bar flogball fans in soggy biscuit sessions will believe a ranting tanty chucker like you
ova reputable gatherer's of ratings like Oztam... neilsen & Repucom

I think not knucklehead

Oh dear...

no one is disputing that neilsen and reucom arent reputable. What we are disputing is how thorough their sampling is. So if you can show us a link that shows they are accurate and thorough please do.

you think a reputable company would allow faulty stats with their name attached to them to be published ?

no

case closed

you dont understand the difference between a reputable report and an accurate one do you?

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

you'd think I corrolate the Figures myself

you think anyone bar flogball fans in soggy biscuit sessions will believe a ranting tanty chucker like you
ova reputable gatherer's of ratings like Oztam... neilsen & Repucom

I think not knucklehead

Oh dear...

no one is disputing that neilsen and reucom arent reputable. What we are disputing is how thorough their sampling is. So if you can show us a link that shows they are accurate and thorough please do.

you think a reputable company would allow faulty stats with their name attached to them to be published ?

no

case closed

you dont understand the difference between a reputable report and an accurate one do you?[/quote]


a reputable report?
a reputable company provides them ... & .. nothing else

enarelle wrote:

Still waiting for an answer on the 10m behind to 15m in front over the last 5 years. You know in sport/business/politics that would be called a significant trend.

You dont need a link to show that there are many more people living in regional NSW/QLD/ACT than in the other states. Even using Topper maths the AFL only has a 15% average on the 5 city metro ratings and that is excluding SOO and Tests. What do you reckon happens when the regional do get added -the NRL strolls to the lead.

Thee view of the AFL crew is like you have an election but you dont count a couple of the outlying poll booths because you weren't there to do the counting.

I'd be interested in seeing these reports too while youre at it. links please

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

you'd think I corrolate the Figures myself

you think anyone bar flogball fans in soggy biscuit sessions will believe a ranting tanty chucker like you
ova reputable gatherer's of ratings like Oztam... neilsen & Repucom

I think not knucklehead

Oh dear...

no one is disputing that neilsen and reucom arent reputable. What we are disputing is how thorough their sampling is. So if you can show us a link that shows they are accurate and thorough please do.

you think a reputable company would allow faulty stats with their name attached to them to be published ?

no

case closed

you dont understand the difference between a reputable report and an accurate one do you?[/quote]


a reputable report?
a reputable company provides them ... & .. nothing else [/quote]

For the final time, no one is disputing their reputation, just the accuracy of the report for the purpose of gauging full national interest in sports. If they were sampled for that purpose they would cover all regions of the country evenly. They don't. They know it, we know it, you know it.

Until you can show they do STFU

Xman wrote:

enarelle wrote:

Still waiting for an answer on the 10m behind to 15m in front over the last 5 years. You know in sport/business/politics that would be called a significant trend.

You dont need a link to show that there are many more people living in regional NSW/QLD/ACT than in the other states. Even using Topper maths the AFL only has a 15% average on the 5 city metro ratings and that is excluding SOO and Tests. What do you reckon happens when the regional do get added -the NRL strolls to the lead.

Thee view of the AFL crew is like you have an election but you dont count a couple of the outlying poll booths because you weren't there to do the counting.

I've already told you that the AFL began airing on two different digitial channels, on both ch7 and ch10, within the last few years. The NRL has only been shown on Nine.

Ive seen a number of media reports claiming the AFL aduiences had reduced. However closer inspection showed the reports completely ignored the ratings for the second digitial channels. Ive even seen OZ tam figures quoting only ch10 figures and ignoring 1HD which made up about 1/5th of the audience.

Xman, there is no 25 million turnaround. The AFL beat the NRL by 13 million in 2011. The AFL is not 15 million behind. Why seek an explanation for a statistic that is fake to beging with?

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

you'd think I corrolate the Figures myself

you think anyone bar flogball fans in soggy biscuit sessions will believe a ranting tanty chucker like you
ova reputable gatherer's of ratings like Oztam... neilsen & Repucom

I think not knucklehead

Oh dear...

no one is disputing that neilsen and reucom arent reputable. What we are disputing is how thorough their sampling is. So if you can show us a link that shows they are accurate and thorough please do.

you think a reputable company would allow faulty stats with their name attached to them to be published ?

no

case closed

you dont understand the difference between a reputable report and an accurate one do you?[/quote]


a reputable report?
a reputable company provides them ... & .. nothing else [/quote]

For the final time, no one is disputing their reputation, just the accuracy of the report for the purpose of gauging full national interest in sports. If they were sampled for that purpose they would cover all regions of the country evenly. They don't. They know it, we know it, you know it.

Until you can show they do STFU[/quote]


just keep running around in circles like you are now .... a dancing bear you are
i poke you
n.....up you get ... jumping around , not really knowing what the hell is going on
hut hut

Its amazing how when asked to provide evidence of the ratings figures you claim you avoid the subject and burp away.