Talking Footy

Given the title of this thread - of the ratings are now thought to be compromised, tampered with, illegitimate etc. then is there any reason to discuss them.

WookieReturns wrote: Fri Oct 04, 2024 10:53 pm

sure I mean it had nothing to do with roy morgan giving me a 10 year data dump recently.

Next week im getting a 20 year one. Im sure you'll bitch and moan about that.

Roy Morgan?
the mob that put up a survey that had the Storm as the 2nd most popular football team of any code in the land , ?
some 300K more fans the collingdon




yea , their surveys are on point eh
highly credible

put that 20 year survey up sookie .. can't wait
we all need a good belly laugh every now & then

Fred wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 7:23 am

Given the title of this thread - of the ratings are now thought to be compromised, tampered with, illegitimate etc. then is there any reason to discuss them.

they're credible when they're credible Fwed & not when its not.
look at the survey Roy Morgan ( the writers of sookies new source of gospels) put up about football clubs with most fans in the land ... they're utter garbage
https://www.realestate.com.au/news/surp ... -nrl-fans/
https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/sydn ... west-coast

& the derps & misses GF TV ratings
are about as credible .

most other TV ratings data during the year has been fine , following a pattern & path... the fumbles & giggles STV ratings for finals going up sharply correlates with the sharp decline in FTA ratings ( down 1.3 million on 2023 ) & hundreds of thousands free kayo subscriptions
but...
when its beyond outlier ridiculous with no legit explanation .. it needs to be challenged

Has anyone else questioned it - serious question - would be curious to know.

Fred wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 10:46 am

Has anyone else questioned it - serious question - would be curious to know.

ofc
a shit storm of raised eyebrows .... from people who don't drink koolaid

azif wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 7:57 am

they're credible when they're credible Fwed & not when its not.

they are credible when it suits rugby league fans who dont WANT to fucking understand anything except averages (and even then only when they are favourable). For rugby league, the fate of the ratings world hangs on the average viewing figures derived from a SURVEY of 12,000 people extrapolated out to the rest of the population. No other information or SURVEYS that disputes this - even if said surveys interview 5 times as many people - shall be allowed for discussion.

This is decreed by the likes of azif

azif wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 11:23 am

ofc
a shit storm of raised eyebrows .... from people who don't drink koolaid

From rugby league people. Who suddenly just cant believe the ratings agency, but whose data they have deemed sacronsanct all year until it disagreed with their worldview.

azif wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 11:23 am

Fred wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 10:46 am

Has anyone else questioned it - serious question - would be curious to know.

ofc
a shit storm of raised eyebrows .... from people who don't drink koolaid

I’d be interested in a link as very curious if that’s possible. I’ll do a search re AFL grand final ratings and conspiracy theories of fake or something like that.

I read this just now re: figures for grand final in response to a list of most watched



•
This is totally misleading, 2024 is the national audience, the rest are the 5 city metro audience.

2024 is the largest only since 2021.

2005 still has the national record of 4.449 million.




Thoughts ?

WookieReturns wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 12:12 pm

azif wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 7:57 am

they're credible when they're credible Fwed & not when its not.

they are credible when it suits rugby league fans who dont WANT to fucking understand anything except averages (and even then only when they are favourable). For rugby league, the fate of the ratings world hangs on the average viewing figures derived from a SURVEY of 12,000 people extrapolated out to the rest of the population. No other information or SURVEYS that disputes this - even if said surveys interview 5 times as many people - shall be allowed for discussion.

This is decreed by the likes of azif

they're credible when they aren't wildly out of whack cockhead
blowout 2022 3.06 million
blowout 2024 4.02 million

yea right

WookieReturns wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 12:14 pm

azif wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 11:23 am

ofc
a shit storm of raised eyebrows .... from people who don't drink koolaid

From rugby league people. Who suddenly just cant believe the ratings agency, but whose data they have deemed sacronsanct all year until it disagreed with their worldview.

2022 blowout 3.06 million
2024 blowout 4.02 million

nothing to see here say the fumblers

ddddooooooddddjjjaaayyyyyyy

azif wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 1:00 pm

WookieReturns wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 12:14 pm

azif wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 11:23 am

ofc
a shit storm of raised eyebrows .... from people who don't drink koolaid

From rugby league people. Who suddenly just cant believe the ratings agency, but whose data they have deemed sacronsanct all year until it disagreed with their worldview.

2022 blowout 3.06 million
2024 blowout 4.02 million

nothing to see here say the fumblers

I think 2022 was Swans v Geelong ? So only one traditional market - the talk prior to the grand final was this should be bigger as you are drawing into two non traditional markets - a lot of people who wouldn’t normally watch - compared to only 1 or none from non traditional markets.

I’ve search and can’t see anyone else comment that they thi k there was some nafarious activity in regard to the grand final. Maybe people had better access on streaming with 7 plus thus being away may still have watched on a device ?

Fred wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 3:40 pm

azif wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 1:00 pm

WookieReturns wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 12:14 pm

From rugby league people. Who suddenly just cant believe the ratings agency, but whose data they have deemed sacronsanct all year until it disagreed with their worldview.

2022 blowout 3.06 million
2024 blowout 4.02 million

nothing to see here say the fumblers

I think 2022 was Swans v Geelong ? So only one traditional market - the talk prior to the grand final was this should be bigger as you are drawing into two non traditional markets - a lot of people who wouldn’t normally watch - compared to only 1 or none from non traditional markets.

I’ve search and can’t see anyone else comment that they thi k there was some nafarious activity in regard to the grand final. Maybe people had better access on streaming with 7 plus thus being away may still have watched on a device ?

thats called turd polishing fwed
once it was clear it was going to be a shit show ... utter crap

apart from vicky kicky cultists the only other people who would still of been watching were diehard wions fans .. & they only make up a portion of brisbane audience
even the slightly interested viewer in Brisbane is turning off that garbage along with everyone else

thats why blowouts rate like turds

a million more ?
pull the other one

azif wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 12:59 pm

they're credible when they aren't wildly out of whack cockhead
blowout 2022 3.06 million
blowout 2024 4.02 million

yea right

You are literally the only person Ive seen on multiple forums that seems to be on this. So...probably not