Talking Footy

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

and yet you seem to know they lose 12m every year based on nothing more then an article which clearly states .. the 12m is expenditure ... not a loss
I mean .. what sort of fuckwit are you ?

Storm .... self sufficient

It highlighted the fact that news forked out 60 odd million in 5 years. Why would they do that if the storm were self sufficient?

all it said was news supplies funds for their costs

well of course they do
who else would ?



marcus .. what a tool

That's the point dumbarse! Owners shouldn't have to fund their club if they are self sufficient!

If a teams revenue is supplied by sponsorships, gate receipts, memberships and the league grant they don't need funds from an owner!

The storm needed 65m in 5 years! Why? Because they have few supporters, crowds, sponsors, or members! :D

Fuck you lie a lot.

I have seen and posted articles here that state the storm have made profits you dope, yet you keep peddling this crap about the storm losing all this money.

If $65 million has been spent in Victoria you dumbarse, that's a good thing for RL considering 15 years ago, not a single fucking cent was spent.

Yep, $65 Million to get RL started and played in Victoria, money well spent, or as you people keep saying for your code, money invested in the future.

So the Storm are the only team to make a profit then? Remember 15 of 16 clubs don't make a profit. Could you please link the source claiming that the Storm made a profit without the assistance if News Ltd?

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Fuck you lie a lot.

I have seen and posted articles here that state the storm have made profits you dope, yet you keep peddling this crap about the storm losing all this money.

If $65 million has been spent in Victoria you dumbarse, that's a good thing for RL considering 15 years ago, not a single fucking cent was spent.

Yep, $65 Million to get RL started and played in Victoria, money well spent, or as you people keep saying for your code, money invested in the future.

I showed my source dumbarse, so don't call me a liar!

My point is the storm are NOT self sufficient, not even close.

You idiot, if $65 million has been spent, it's on RL, not the storm you r3tard.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

You idiot, if $65 million has been spent, it's on RL, not the storm you r3tard.

The article specifically stated it was dumbarse

Xman wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

You idiot, if $65 million has been spent, it's on RL, not the storm you r3tard.

The article specifically stated it was dumbarse

Well it's wrong you imba, tell me, how could the storm have on average $6 million a year more than anyone else?

They'd have lost not a single bloody game in any season if they were spending like that.

Use that brain of yours or at least knock it out of neutral first.

Millions spent of the game in Victoria doesn't mean the Melbourne Storm got the lot you fucking dumbarse.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Xman wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

You idiot, if $65 million has been spent, it's on RL, not the storm you r3tard.

The article specifically stated it was dumbarse

Well it's wrong you imba, tell me, how could the storm have on average $6 million a year more than anyone else?

They'd have lost not a single bloody game in any season if they were spending like that.

Use that brain of yours or at least knock it out of neutral first.

Millions spent of the game in Victoria doesn't mean the Melbourne Storm got the lot you fucking dumbarse.

WTF?

They are required to make up for the storms poor revenue due to few fans, crowds or sponsors. Add to that they have high costs. Plus they spend more on their football department than any other NRL team "At about $12 million a year, the Storm spend more on their football than anyone else."

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 6559523122

All of that money coming in from News Limited to pump up their football expenditure. Thank God the AFL does not allow private ownership.

What money from news idiot?

Xman wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Xman wrote:

The article specifically stated it was dumbarse

Well it's wrong you imba, tell me, how could the storm have on average $6 million a year more than anyone else?

They'd have lost not a single bloody game in any season if they were spending like that.

Use that brain of yours or at least knock it out of neutral first.

Millions spent of the game in Victoria doesn't mean the Melbourne Storm got the lot you fucking dumbarse.

WTF?

They are required to make up for the storms poor revenue due to few fans, crowds or sponsors. Add to that they have high costs. Plus they spend more on their football department than any other NRL team "At about $12 million a year, the Storm spend more on their football than anyone else."

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 6559523122

Want me to again show you that they indeed do and can make a profit from year to year without adding all of Victorian RL to it?

Thickhead, how many times does it have to be posted?

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Xman wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Well it's wrong you imba, tell me, how could the storm have on average $6 million a year more than anyone else?

They'd have lost not a single bloody game in any season if they were spending like that.

Use that brain of yours or at least knock it out of neutral first.

Millions spent of the game in Victoria doesn't mean the Melbourne Storm got the lot you fucking dumbarse.

WTF?

They are required to make up for the storms poor revenue due to few fans, crowds or sponsors. Add to that they have high costs. Plus they spend more on their football department than any other NRL team "At about $12 million a year, the Storm spend more on their football than anyone else."

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 6559523122

Want me to again show you that they indeed do and can make a profit from year to year without adding all of Victorian RL to it?

Thickhead, how many times does it have to be posted?

And I will post the article stating the precarious financial position of the storm and how their owners were required to fund them to the tune of 65m over 5 years

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

What money from news idiot?

Not sure if serious?

My god, can you please get it through your thick skull xmoron that when they put Melbourne up against a team from anywhere out here in the NRL, they are putting Victorian RL up against a single fucking club.

Fuck you are dumb, really dumb.

Stewie wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

What money from news idiot?

Not sure if serious?

Very serious know all, where did the money for the storm come from, go on tell us.