Talking Footy

Lol
You have more H&A games
Compared to us .
We have a rep season ...you don't .

We win overall .
It's a bitter pill to swallow for you but you can't change reality .

Keep but but buting it's hilarious .

GOLD GOLD GOLD

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol
You have more H&A games
Compared to us .
We have a rep season ...you don't .

We win overall .
It's a bitter pill to swallow for you but you can't change reality .

Keep but but buting it's hilarious .

GOLD GOLD GOLD

We have less available games on TV due to concurrent scheduling. If we had a similar schedule to RL we would be ahead

Don't bitch to me about when games are on
You mob gloat about your media deal .
Not our fault the fumblers can't negotiate a deal where all games are on at different times .

You also have one more FTA game than us per week

You have games televised into home markets to get the best ratings . you still lose
With more games than us
You still lose

Get used to it .
All the but but butting won't change the fact
RL IS THE MOST WATCHED SPORT IN AUST..
Wins by millions
Gold GOLD


GOLD

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol
You have more H&A games
Compared to us .
We have a rep season ...you don't .

We win overall .
It's a bitter pill to swallow for you but you can't change reality .

Keep but but buting it's hilarious .

GOLD GOLD GOLD

We have less available games on TV due to concurrent scheduling. If we had a similar schedule to RL we would be ahead

Oh But But But But, Ooh Ooh But But But You have slightly over 4 games on FTA shown into each of your markets , we have slightly less than 3 games shown into our local markets. And in the end but but but. You chose not not to show your games separately, rather Perth teams into perth , Adelaide into Adelaide, Melbourne into Melbourne ,Sydney into Sydney all designed to boost ratings , But at the end of the day your ratings are lower. You may have won some battles but you lost the war. better luck next year.

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Um let me explain it for those currently sailing down a river in Egypt.

In a decathlon ...it is not how many events you may win but how well you go overall .

Ratings are like that
AFL might win a few .
But when it's all added up at the end of the season
We can only have ONE winner .
GOLD for RL
Silver for AFL

Which means nothing more than you had more available content. It certainly doesn't prove popularity. Your decathlon example fails because if one competitor won the vast majority of events, like the AFL have, they would certainly win the gold at the end. Your RL competitor simply had more events in comparison. If they both had competed in the same number of events the AFL competitor would have won easily.

Surely you don't believe what you say ya dill!!!! The fact is you fumblers had more content. You had more games and your fumbling goes for way longer than a RL game - that equates to more content!!! And even with that you got smashed by 8 million+. Just take a deep breath ya dill and take it like a man instead of whinging and whining like a schoolgirl!!!

The gnashing of teeth & the stamping of feet are sure signs that when reality intrudes into the AFL propaganda bubble the brainwashed tools just can't accept it .
The but but but but but but buting is great entertainment .

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Don't bitch to me about when games are on
You mob gloat about your media deal .
Not our fault the fumblers can't negotiate a deal where all games are on at different times .

You also have one more FTA game than us per week

You have games televised into home markets to get the best ratings . you still lose
With more games than us
You still lose

Get used to it .
All the but but butting won't change the fact
RL IS THE MOST WATCHED SPORT IN AUST..
Wins by millions
Gold GOLD


GOLD

AFLCrap, you see the latest trick wookie trying to pull with his ratings spreadsheets for the great unwashed on Bigfooty..?

He is adding US ratings =D> to the AFL spreadsheet and also adding the brownlow just to try and catch up ground... :_<> :_<>

Mate the reality is starting to kicking in and they will squirm and do whatever they can to make that gap seem smaller than it actually is.

Terry wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Um let me explain it for those currently sailing down a river in Egypt.

In a decathlon ...it is not how many events you may win but how well you go overall .

Ratings are like that
AFL might win a few .
But when it's all added up at the end of the season
We can only have ONE winner .
GOLD for RL
Silver for AFL

Which means nothing more than you had more available content. It certainly doesn't prove popularity. Your decathlon example fails because if one competitor won the vast majority of events, like the AFL have, they would certainly win the gold at the end. Your RL competitor simply had more events in comparison. If they both had competed in the same number of events the AFL competitor would have won easily.

Surely you don't believe what you say ya dill!!!! The fact is you fumblers had more content. You had more games and your fumbling goes for way longer than a RL game - that equates to more content!!! And even with that you got smashed by 8 million+. Just take a deep breath ya dill and take it like a man instead of whinging and whining like a schoolgirl!!!

LOL.

To begin with all but one of our games are shown directly against another game. The effect is essentially halving your telecasted games because no one can watch two games at the same time, and even if you could OZAM wouldnt count it. Eg: on a typical Saturday there are 5 AFL games, but all of them overlap so any viewer can only watch 3 of them at the most.

Secondly, our game goes for longer which hurts the ratings, not helps. Eg: I can watch 6 hours of AFL on Saturday but only get counted as watching 2 games. You can watch 6 hours of NRL but that counts as 3 games. Yet we both spent the same amount of time watching our sport, and the advertising dollar received by the network is roughly the same.

Any comment on these two points or would you like to continue your childish replies?

U.S. Ratings
Lol

I'm sure the yanks would be glued to their sets to watch a bunch of unco stick insects fumble around a field

eelofwest wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Don't bitch to me about when games are on
You mob gloat about your media deal .
Not our fault the fumblers can't negotiate a deal where all games are on at different times .

You also have one more FTA game than us per week

You have games televised into home markets to get the best ratings . you still lose
With more games than us
You still lose

Get used to it .
All the but but butting won't change the fact
RL IS THE MOST WATCHED SPORT IN AUST..
Wins by millions
Gold GOLD


GOLD

AFLCrap, you see the latest trick wookie trying to pull with his ratings spreadsheets for the great unwashed on Bigfooty..?

He is adding US ratings =D> to the AFL spreadsheet and also adding the brownlow just to try and catch up ground... :_<> :_<>

Mate the reality is starting to kicking in and they will squirm and do whatever they can to make that gap seem smaller than it actually is.

Interesting sleight of hand there by the Wookster!!!!! He'll be on a slippery slope if he continues this. Here's a couple questions: The NRL is also on US TV - where are those ratings? The NRL has a TV deal with Premier Sports in the UK I believe. As far as I know they show all games - many of them live. Considering there are many expatriates in the UK as well as millions of RL supporters in the north why aren't those numbers added?

Yep - slippery slope there. The fumblers always whinge about adding the NZ ratings - whilst ignoring the fact there is a NZ team in the comp - but here they are adding the US ratings. Hypocrisy thy name is fumbleball lololololol

AFLcrap1 wrote:

The gnashing of teeth & the stamping of feet are sure signs that when reality intrudes into the AFL propaganda bubble the brainwashed tools just can't accept it .
The but but but but but but buting is great entertainment .

No nashing of teeth at all, you're completely misreading me. I'm absolutely comfortable with the AFL winning almost every ratings direct comparison but ending up with a little less in the season tally. The direct comparisons show popularity, the tally merely the most content

They seem to be having massive issues accepting they got beat this year .

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

The gnashing of teeth & the stamping of feet are sure signs that when reality intrudes into the AFL propaganda bubble the brainwashed tools just can't accept it .
The but but but but but but buting is great entertainment .

No nashing of teeth at all, you're completely misreading me. I'm absolutely comfortable with the AFL winning almost every ratings direct comparison but ending up with a little less in the season tally. The direct comparisons show popularity, the tally merely the most content

Listen to these fumbling dills - hilarious lololololol "ending up with a little less in the season tally". That'd be 8 million pal......yes......8 million less lolololololololol........they can't possibly be this stupid lolololol.

"The direct comparisons show popularity, the tally merely the most content". The fumblers have more games and they go for an hour longer - that gives them massively more content - yet RL gets 8 million more viewers lololololol. Does this bloke tell bald faced lies or did he have such little education he can't comprehend the facts? Incredible stuff llololololololol.

Most games televised ...AFL
Most games televised on FTA...(far bigger viewing audience than STV)..AFL

Most viewed sport ..RL

Lol but but but

BUTTHURT fumblers are sailing down the river in Egypt .

I hope this denial goes on forever .
It's hysterical

Reminds me of the Black knight in Monty Python

NlolRL wrote:

Terry wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Um let me explain it for those currently sailing down a river in Egypt.

In a decathlon ...it is not how many events you may win but how well you go overall .

Ratings are like that
AFL might win a few .
But when it's all added up at the end of the season
We can only have ONE winner .
GOLD for RL
Silver for AFL

Which means nothing more than you had more available content. It certainly doesn't prove popularity. Your decathlon example fails because if one competitor won the vast majority of events, like the AFL have, they would certainly win the gold at the end. Your RL competitor simply had more events in comparison. If they both had competed in the same number of events the AFL competitor would have won easily.

Surely you don't believe what you say ya dill!!!! The fact is you fumblers had more content. You had more games and your fumbling goes for way longer than a RL game - that equates to more content!!! And even with that you got smashed by 8 million+. Just take a deep breath ya dill and take it like a man instead of whinging and whining like a schoolgirl!!!

LOL.

To begin with all but one of our games are shown directly against another game. The effect is essentially halving your telecasted games because no one can watch two games at the same time, and even if you could OZAM wouldnt count it. Eg: on a typical Saturday there are 5 AFL games, but all of them overlap so any viewer can only watch 3 of them at the most.

Secondly, our game goes for longer which hurts the ratings, not helps. Eg: I can watch 6 hours of AFL on Saturday but only get counted as watching 2 games. You can watch 6 hours of NRL but that counts as 3 games. Yet we both spent the same amount of time watching our sport, and the advertising dollar received by the network is roughly the same.

Any comment on these two points or would you like to continue your childish replies?

Im sure I just posted about your over lapping matches. As for games going longer being a disadvantage that's absolute Bullshit and a sign of your desperation. both systems have there pros and cons. is either game is poor for the first 30m , that almost half our game, everyone switches off, almost impossible for us to recover from. For you its just the first quarter. And you loose very few viewers if its a one sided 1st quarter.

The real kicker is , Head to head matches are over after 90m giving you 1 hour of unopposed viewing. How many people would switch over at the end of the league game ?