Talking Footy

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Fred wrote:

Terry wrote:

It looks like the fumbleball GF outrated the RL equivalent. Congratulations to the fumblers - it's been a few years but well done on this occasion.

See fumblers - that's how an adult handles these things. No ifs, no buts, no excuses.

No no no... you are suppossed to find sonething that supports your argument that your code is superior lol. Dig around there must be something. Maybe point to origin ..... or to prime time v non prime time.

Our ratings speak for themselves. Fewer games higher ratings Wow just Wow!

Its true, you have had higher ratings matches this year but that simply means you've had a lot more lower rating matches.

The gap/chasm between the haves and the have nots is getting wider.

if you really did have fewer games but higher ratings why are your games repeatedly outrated by the AFL in comparable formats.

Have a good think about that one Puddy

The stupidity of you fumblers never ceases to amaze. Did you even read this post, can you even read ya dill!!!!! Some games the fumblers gets more viewers some games RL gets more. At the end of the day fumbling gets a lot more lower rating games than RL. That enables RL to get 8 million more viewers this year than fumbling.......that's 8 million ya dill......that's a massive win to RL. Is there any way your tiny brain can compute that???? Sadly I'd say the answer is no. Dills!!!!!!!!!!!!

Terry wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Fred wrote:

Terry wrote:

It looks like the fumbleball GF outrated the RL equivalent. Congratulations to the fumblers - it's been a few years but well done on this occasion.

See fumblers - that's how an adult handles these things. No ifs, no buts, no excuses.

No no no... you are suppossed to find sonething that supports your argument that your code is superior lol. Dig around there must be something. Maybe point to origin ..... or to prime time v non prime time.

Our ratings speak for themselves. Fewer games higher ratings Wow just Wow!

Its true, you have had higher ratings matches this year but that simply means you've had a lot more lower rating matches.

The gap/chasm between the haves and the have nots is getting wider.

if you really did have fewer games but higher ratings why are your games repeatedly outrated by the AFL in comparable formats.

Have a good think about that one Puddy

The stupidity of you fumblers never ceases to amaze. Did you even read this post, can you even read ya dill!!!!! Some games the fumblers gets more viewers some games RL gets more. At the end of the day fumbling gets a lot more lower rating games than RL. That enables RL to get 8 million more viewers this year than fumbling.......that's 8 million ya dill......that's a massive win to RL. Is there any way your tiny brain can compute that???? Sadly I'd say the answer is no. Dills!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cutting through all the childish insults youve actually discovered the cause. Most AFL games are shown concurrently, and many are only shown to selected cities. Therefore these games must rate lower. The NRL rarely outrates the AFL on a 1 game v 1 game basis though

NlolRL wrote:

Terry wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Fred wrote:

Terry wrote:

It looks like the fumbleball GF outrated the RL equivalent. Congratulations to the fumblers - it's been a few years but well done on this occasion.

See fumblers - that's how an adult handles these things. No ifs, no buts, no excuses.

No no no... you are suppossed to find sonething that supports your argument that your code is superior lol. Dig around there must be something. Maybe point to origin ..... or to prime time v non prime time.

Our ratings speak for themselves. Fewer games higher ratings Wow just Wow!

Its true, you have had higher ratings matches this year but that simply means you've had a lot more lower rating matches.

The gap/chasm between the haves and the have nots is getting wider.

if you really did have fewer games but higher ratings why are your games repeatedly outrated by the AFL in comparable formats.

Have a good think about that one Puddy

The stupidity of you fumblers never ceases to amaze. Did you even read this post, can you even read ya dill!!!!! Some games the fumblers gets more viewers some games RL gets more. At the end of the day fumbling gets a lot more lower rating games than RL. That enables RL to get 8 million more viewers this year than fumbling.......that's 8 million ya dill......that's a massive win to RL. Is there any way your tiny brain can compute that???? Sadly I'd say the answer is no. Dills!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cutting through all the childish insults youve actually discovered the cause. Most AFL games are shown concurrently, and many are only shown to selected cities. Therefore these games must rate lower. The NRL rarely outrates the AFL on a 1 game v 1 game basis though

Right on cue the loonies come in lolololololol. How laughable are these dills lolololololol. They just can't accept the 8 million+ victory RL has had over the fumbling game. Do these people have insecurity problems? Small man syndrome? My pecker is bigger than your pecker issues? Lololololololololololo. The if's, the but's, the maybe's - delusional.

I'll give you a tip fumblers - if you believe all the lame excuses you bring up get fumblehouse to change it. Until then cut out the whining and whinging and cussing and spitting. You're like kindergarten kids fighting over the size of their crayons lololoololooololol........who cares!!!!

Mental health shout out to Swino - has anyone seen or heard of him since the Swines loss in the fumbling GF? Can someone please check on him - I''m very worried about him. Whether it was the Swines flogging or the massive 8 million+ ratings win RL had over fumbleball it's not worth putting yourself through mental torture Swino. Please let us know your ok - or ring your mum.

Terry wrote:

Mental health shout out to Swino - has anyone seen or heard of him since the Swines loss in the fumbling GF? Can someone please check on him - I''m very worried about him. Whether it was the Swines flogging or the massive 8 million+ ratings win RL had over fumbleball it's not worth putting yourself through mental torture Swino. Please let us know your ok - or ring your mum.

He's probably off undercover somewhere .
Apparently we don't know how important he is .

Terry wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

Terry wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Fred wrote:

Terry wrote:

It looks like the fumbleball GF outrated the RL equivalent. Congratulations to the fumblers - it's been a few years but well done on this occasion.

See fumblers - that's how an adult handles these things. No ifs, no buts, no excuses.

No no no... you are suppossed to find sonething that supports your argument that your code is superior lol. Dig around there must be something. Maybe point to origin ..... or to prime time v non prime time.

Our ratings speak for themselves. Fewer games higher ratings Wow just Wow!

Its true, you have had higher ratings matches this year but that simply means you've had a lot more lower rating matches.

The gap/chasm between the haves and the have nots is getting wider.

if you really did have fewer games but higher ratings why are your games repeatedly outrated by the AFL in comparable formats.

Have a good think about that one Puddy

The stupidity of you fumblers never ceases to amaze. Did you even read this post, can you even read ya dill!!!!! Some games the fumblers gets more viewers some games RL gets more. At the end of the day fumbling gets a lot more lower rating games than RL. That enables RL to get 8 million more viewers this year than fumbling.......that's 8 million ya dill......that's a massive win to RL. Is there any way your tiny brain can compute that???? Sadly I'd say the answer is no. Dills!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cutting through all the childish insults youve actually discovered the cause. Most AFL games are shown concurrently, and many are only shown to selected cities. Therefore these games must rate lower. The NRL rarely outrates the AFL on a 1 game v 1 game basis though

Right on cue the loonies come in lolololololol. How laughable are these dills lolololololol. They just can't accept the 8 million+ victory RL has had over the fumbling game. Do these people have insecurity problems? Small man syndrome? My pecker is bigger than your pecker issues? Lololololololololololo. The if's, the but's, the maybe's - delusional.

I'll give you a tip fumblers - if you believe all the lame excuses you bring up get fumblehouse to change it. Until then cut out the whining and whinging and cussing and spitting. You're like kindergarten kids fighting over the size of their crayons lololoololooololol........who cares!!!!

Terry, are you incapable of responding without resorting to immature taunts?

Seriously, the AFL had the most watched game of the year, the most watched home and away game on FTA, and the most watched game of STV. They won almost every FN comparison, including being ahead on STV by almost 100k each time.

The only reason your tally was ahead is because you have more games shown to every city in isolation. Thats it, theres no other explanation

Terry wrote:

Mental health shout out to Swino - has anyone seen or heard of him since the Swines loss in the fumbling GF? Can someone please check on him - I''m very worried about him. Whether it was the Swines flogging or the massive 8 million+ ratings win RL had over fumbleball it's not worth putting yourself through mental torture Swino. Please let us know your ok - or ring your mum.

not sure you should be making fun of mental health, even on this forum

NlolRL wrote:

Terry wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

Terry wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Fred wrote:

Terry wrote:

It looks like the fumbleball GF outrated the RL equivalent. Congratulations to the fumblers - it's been a few years but well done on this occasion.

See fumblers - that's how an adult handles these things. No ifs, no buts, no excuses.

No no no... you are suppossed to find sonething that supports your argument that your code is superior lol. Dig around there must be something. Maybe point to origin ..... or to prime time v non prime time.

Our ratings speak for themselves. Fewer games higher ratings Wow just Wow!

Its true, you have had higher ratings matches this year but that simply means you've had a lot more lower rating matches.

The gap/chasm between the haves and the have nots is getting wider.

if you really did have fewer games but higher ratings why are your games repeatedly outrated by the AFL in comparable formats.

Have a good think about that one Puddy

The stupidity of you fumblers never ceases to amaze. Did you even read this post, can you even read ya dill!!!!! Some games the fumblers gets more viewers some games RL gets more. At the end of the day fumbling gets a lot more lower rating games than RL. That enables RL to get 8 million more viewers this year than fumbling.......that's 8 million ya dill......that's a massive win to RL. Is there any way your tiny brain can compute that???? Sadly I'd say the answer is no. Dills!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cutting through all the childish insults youve actually discovered the cause. Most AFL games are shown concurrently, and many are only shown to selected cities. Therefore these games must rate lower. The NRL rarely outrates the AFL on a 1 game v 1 game basis though

Right on cue the loonies come in lolololololol. How laughable are these dills lolololololol. They just can't accept the 8 million+ victory RL has had over the fumbling game. Do these people have insecurity problems? Small man syndrome? My pecker is bigger than your pecker issues? Lololololololololololo. The if's, the but's, the maybe's - delusional.

I'll give you a tip fumblers - if you believe all the lame excuses you bring up get fumblehouse to change it. Until then cut out the whining and whinging and cussing and spitting. You're like kindergarten kids fighting over the size of their crayons lololoololooololol........who cares!!!!

Terry, are you incapable of responding without resorting to immature taunts?

Seriously, the AFL had the most watched game of the year, the most watched home and away game on FTA, and the most watched game of STV. They won almost every FN comparison, including being ahead on STV by almost 100k each time.

The only reason your tally was ahead is because you have more games shown to every city in isolation. Thats it, theres no other explanation

Dear oh dear ......is there any base level of stupidity these fumblers can't fall to?? Hey super dimwit........when you get a bill you look at the bottom of the tab. That is what counts......the bottom line. In this case RL gets 8 million more viewers than you fumblers this year.

Yes.....that's 8 million......a massive flogging!!!! Who cares how it happened ........that's the figure....it's irrefutable, unarguable, uncontested. You can cherry pick anything you like but you can't change the bottom line..........8 million more people watched RL this year than the fumblers despite having less games.. And: theres more bad news for you fumbling zealots - theres an international tournament in the UK still to come.......more viewers.....bring it on!!!!!

NlolRL wrote:

Terry wrote:

Mental health shout out to Swino - has anyone seen or heard of him since the Swines loss in the fumbling GF? Can someone please check on him - I''m very worried about him. Whether it was the Swines flogging or the massive 8 million+ ratings win RL had over fumbleball it's not worth putting yourself through mental torture Swino. Please let us know your ok - or ring your mum.

not sure you should be making fun of mental health, even on this forum

I'm not ya dill......I'm shouting out to poor ol' Swino....I hope he's ok. Sport is not so important as to impinge your mental health. Especially such a low base skilled 'sport' like the fumblers play. Swino.....please let us know you're ok.

Terry wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

Terry wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

Terry wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Fred wrote:

Terry wrote:

It looks like the fumbleball GF outrated the RL equivalent. Congratulations to the fumblers - it's been a few years but well done on this occasion.

See fumblers - that's how an adult handles these things. No ifs, no buts, no excuses.

No no no... you are suppossed to find sonething that supports your argument that your code is superior lol. Dig around there must be something. Maybe point to origin ..... or to prime time v non prime time.

Our ratings speak for themselves. Fewer games higher ratings Wow just Wow!

Its true, you have had higher ratings matches this year but that simply means you've had a lot more lower rating matches.

The gap/chasm between the haves and the have nots is getting wider.

if you really did have fewer games but higher ratings why are your games repeatedly outrated by the AFL in comparable formats.

Have a good think about that one Puddy

The stupidity of you fumblers never ceases to amaze. Did you even read this post, can you even read ya dill!!!!! Some games the fumblers gets more viewers some games RL gets more. At the end of the day fumbling gets a lot more lower rating games than RL. That enables RL to get 8 million more viewers this year than fumbling.......that's 8 million ya dill......that's a massive win to RL. Is there any way your tiny brain can compute that???? Sadly I'd say the answer is no. Dills!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cutting through all the childish insults youve actually discovered the cause. Most AFL games are shown concurrently, and many are only shown to selected cities. Therefore these games must rate lower. The NRL rarely outrates the AFL on a 1 game v 1 game basis though

Right on cue the loonies come in lolololololol. How laughable are these dills lolololololol. They just can't accept the 8 million+ victory RL has had over the fumbling game. Do these people have insecurity problems? Small man syndrome? My pecker is bigger than your pecker issues? Lololololololololololo. The if's, the but's, the maybe's - delusional.

I'll give you a tip fumblers - if you believe all the lame excuses you bring up get fumblehouse to change it. Until then cut out the whining and whinging and cussing and spitting. You're like kindergarten kids fighting over the size of their crayons lololoololooololol........who cares!!!!

Terry, are you incapable of responding without resorting to immature taunts?

Seriously, the AFL had the most watched game of the year, the most watched home and away game on FTA, and the most watched game of STV. They won almost every FN comparison, including being ahead on STV by almost 100k each time.

The only reason your tally was ahead is because you have more games shown to every city in isolation. Thats it, theres no other explanation

Dear oh dear ......is there any base level of stupidity these fumblers can't fall to?? Hey super dimwit........when you get a bill you look at the bottom of the tab. That is what counts......the bottom line. In this case RL gets 8 million more viewers than you fumblers this year.

Yes.....that's 8 million......a massive flogging!!!! Who cares how it happened ........that's the figure....it's irrefutable, unarguable, uncontested. You can cherry pick anything you like but you can't change the bottom line..........8 million more people watched RL this year than the fumblers despite having less games.. And: theres more bad news for you fumbling zealots - theres an international tournament in the UK still to come.......more viewers.....bring it on!!!!!

the sport with the biggest end of season tally can simply mean the sport with the most hours of content. Fascinating for some but pretty irrelevant when youre using ratings to measure popularity. Comparing audiences for similar games is best to compare popularity. The AFL simply wins all of these

Lol but but but but but but but but but but

Gold for Rl
Silver for aflol

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol but but but but but but but but but but

Gold for Rl
Silver for aflol

wrong AFL most watched GF, final, home and away game, and STV game. Gold, gold, gold, gold

Um let me explain it for those currently sailing down a river in Egypt.

In a decathlon ...it is not how many events you may win but how well you go overall .

Ratings are like that
AFL might win a few .
But when it's all added up at the end of the season
We can only have ONE winner .
GOLD for RL
Silver for AFL

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol but but but but but but but but but but

Gold for Rl
Silver for aflol

wrong AFL most watched GF, final, home and away game, and STV game. Gold, gold, gold, gold

What's more funny is that AFL set up their fixture and scheduled their games like the nrlol did how much further ahead would the AFL be in the ratings

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Um let me explain it for those currently sailing down a river in Egypt.

In a decathlon ...it is not how many events you may win but how well you go overall .

Ratings are like that
AFL might win a few .
But when it's all added up at the end of the season
We can only have ONE winner .
GOLD for RL
Silver for AFL

Which means nothing more than you had more available content. It certainly doesn't prove popularity. Your decathlon example fails because if one competitor won the vast majority of events, like the AFL have, they would certainly win the gold at the end. Your RL competitor simply had more events in comparison. If they both had competed in the same number of events the AFL competitor would have won easily.