Talking Footy

AFLcrap1 wrote:

You really are thick .
Answer this

Which sport had the most viewers for 2016

Lol
You won't

He's a simple carefree lad. He wouldn't have a clue about whats going in the real word, other than the price of a flagon of chilled metho. god bless him.

Sun TV #NRLGF Nine *updated* 3.73m metro+regional – record Grand Final metro audience for Nine.

So the AFL won by over 300k despite being non-prime time. Add that to the 8 finals games victories

NlolRL wrote:

Sun TV #NRLGF Nine *updated* 3.73m metro+regional – record Grand Final metro audience for Nine.

So the AFL won by over 300k despite being non-prime time. Add that to the 8 finals games victories

Its been 3 years since you won the largest ratings program on FTA, finally your drought is broken

And its only the largest rating sports program for this year if you do not include NZ Sky for SOO game 1.

Yes because we are looking at which game rated the highest in australia.

eelofwest wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

Sun TV #NRLGF Nine *updated* 3.73m metro+regional – record Grand Final metro audience for Nine.

So the AFL won by over 300k despite being non-prime time. Add that to the 8 finals games victories

Its been 3 years since you won the largest ratings program on FTA, finally your drought is broken

And its only the largest rating sports program for this year if you do not include NZ Sky for SOO game 1.

Well actually, the AFL had won most of the GF comparisons over the last decade but views dropped off when Hawthorn kept on thrashing teams year and year. Either way it won this year's ratings easily

The but buts are already coming in thick and fast from the tin foil hat brigade!

Hahahaha
Keep sucking those lemons loons! & Claiming your fools gold

Sun TV #NRLGF Nine *updated* 3.73m metro+regional (Sydney 1.059m, Melbourne 641k, Brisbane 720k, Ade 109k, Per 118k) (Regionals 1,086,000)

Once again the NRL rates more in Melbourne than the AFL does in Sydney.

250million later and AFL still rates like crap in sydney. =D>

It looks like the fumbleball GF outrated the RL equivalent. Congratulations to the fumblers - it's been a few years but well done on this occasion.

See fumblers - that's how an adult handles these things. No ifs, no buts, no excuses.

Indeed. Imagine when the night time gf comes. And it will unfortunately. But will they move it to the sunday night? With a move of the public holiday in vic from friday to monday they just might?

Terry wrote:

It looks like the fumbleball GF outrated the RL equivalent. Congratulations to the fumblers - it's been a few years but well done on this occasion.

See fumblers - that's how an adult handles these things. No ifs, no buts, no excuses.

No no no... you are suppossed to find sonething that supports your argument that your code is superior lol. Dig around there must be something. Maybe point to origin ..... or to prime time v non prime time.

Thanks Fred but I'm not like you insecure fumbling idiots that can't except anything that doesn't show fumbleball as No 1. Some times you win some times you lose - simple as that.

Fred wrote:

Terry wrote:

It looks like the fumbleball GF outrated the RL equivalent. Congratulations to the fumblers - it's been a few years but well done on this occasion.

See fumblers - that's how an adult handles these things. No ifs, no buts, no excuses.

No no no... you are suppossed to find sonething that supports your argument that your code is superior lol. Dig around there must be something. Maybe point to origin ..... or to prime time v non prime time.

Our ratings speak for themselves. Fewer games higher ratings Wow just Wow!

Its true, you have had higher ratings matches this year but that simply means you've had a lot more lower rating matches.

The gap/chasm between the haves and the have nots is getting wider.

pussycat wrote:

Fred wrote:

Terry wrote:

It looks like the fumbleball GF outrated the RL equivalent. Congratulations to the fumblers - it's been a few years but well done on this occasion.

See fumblers - that's how an adult handles these things. No ifs, no buts, no excuses.

No no no... you are suppossed to find sonething that supports your argument that your code is superior lol. Dig around there must be something. Maybe point to origin ..... or to prime time v non prime time.

Our ratings speak for themselves. Fewer games higher ratings Wow just Wow!

Its true, you have had higher ratings matches this year but that simply means you've had a lot more lower rating matches.

The gap/chasm between the haves and the have nots is getting wider.

Lol head to head or played in similar time slots the AFL wins nearly every time.


Keep up the but buts & fools gold pissycat

leagueiscrap wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Fred wrote:

Terry wrote:

It looks like the fumbleball GF outrated the RL equivalent. Congratulations to the fumblers - it's been a few years but well done on this occasion.

See fumblers - that's how an adult handles these things. No ifs, no buts, no excuses.

No no no... you are suppossed to find sonething that supports your argument that your code is superior lol. Dig around there must be something. Maybe point to origin ..... or to prime time v non prime time.

Our ratings speak for themselves. Fewer games higher ratings Wow just Wow!

Its true, you have had higher ratings matches this year but that simply means you've had a lot more lower rating matches.

The gap/chasm between the haves and the have nots is getting wider.

Lol head to head or played in similar time slots the AFL wins nearly every time.


Keep up the but buts & fools gold pissycat

I don't know - where do ya start with this base level moron. Firstly do you know who you're directing this post at loonie?????? You seem to be having a lot of trouble with your cognitive function lately lolololololo Dill!!!!

Now the simple fact this footy season is that RL got at least 8 million more viewers than fumbleball did despite playing fewer games. Simple really.

Now cue loonie and his fumbling mates to come in with the but but buts, lies and obfuscation. Actually loonie will probably post his reply on some other thread - mama loonie please help your boy lololololol.

pussycat wrote:

Fred wrote:

Terry wrote:

It looks like the fumbleball GF outrated the RL equivalent. Congratulations to the fumblers - it's been a few years but well done on this occasion.

See fumblers - that's how an adult handles these things. No ifs, no buts, no excuses.

No no no... you are suppossed to find sonething that supports your argument that your code is superior lol. Dig around there must be something. Maybe point to origin ..... or to prime time v non prime time.

Our ratings speak for themselves. Fewer games higher ratings Wow just Wow!

Its true, you have had higher ratings matches this year but that simply means you've had a lot more lower rating matches.

The gap/chasm between the haves and the have nots is getting wider.

if you really did have fewer games but higher ratings why are your games repeatedly outrated by the AFL in comparable formats.

Have a good think about that one Puddy