He's a simple carefree lad. He wouldn't have a clue about whats going in the real word, other than the price of a flagon of chilled metho. god bless him.AFLcrap1 wrote:You really are thick .
Answer this
Which sport had the most viewers for 2016
Lol
You won't
NlolRL wrote:Sun TV #NRLGF Nine *updated* 3.73m metro+regional – record Grand Final metro audience for Nine.
So the AFL won by over 300k despite being non-prime time. Add that to the 8 finals games victories
Well actually, the AFL had won most of the GF comparisons over the last decade but views dropped off when Hawthorn kept on thrashing teams year and year. Either way it won this year's ratings easilyeelofwest wrote:NlolRL wrote:Sun TV #NRLGF Nine *updated* 3.73m metro+regional – record Grand Final metro audience for Nine.
So the AFL won by over 300k despite being non-prime time. Add that to the 8 finals games victories
Its been 3 years since you won the largest ratings program on FTA, finally your drought is broken
And its only the largest rating sports program for this year if you do not include NZ Sky for SOO game 1.
No no no... you are suppossed to find sonething that supports your argument that your code is superior lol. Dig around there must be something. Maybe point to origin ..... or to prime time v non prime time.Terry wrote:It looks like the fumbleball GF outrated the RL equivalent. Congratulations to the fumblers - it's been a few years but well done on this occasion.
See fumblers - that's how an adult handles these things. No ifs, no buts, no excuses.
Our ratings speak for themselves. Fewer games higher ratings Wow just Wow!Fred wrote:No no no... you are suppossed to find sonething that supports your argument that your code is superior lol. Dig around there must be something. Maybe point to origin ..... or to prime time v non prime time.Terry wrote:It looks like the fumbleball GF outrated the RL equivalent. Congratulations to the fumblers - it's been a few years but well done on this occasion.
See fumblers - that's how an adult handles these things. No ifs, no buts, no excuses.
Lol head to head or played in similar time slots the AFL wins nearly every time.pussycat wrote:Our ratings speak for themselves. Fewer games higher ratings Wow just Wow!Fred wrote:No no no... you are suppossed to find sonething that supports your argument that your code is superior lol. Dig around there must be something. Maybe point to origin ..... or to prime time v non prime time.Terry wrote:It looks like the fumbleball GF outrated the RL equivalent. Congratulations to the fumblers - it's been a few years but well done on this occasion.
See fumblers - that's how an adult handles these things. No ifs, no buts, no excuses.
Its true, you have had higher ratings matches this year but that simply means you've had a lot more lower rating matches.
The gap/chasm between the haves and the have nots is getting wider.
I don't know - where do ya start with this base level moron. Firstly do you know who you're directing this post at loonie?????? You seem to be having a lot of trouble with your cognitive function lately lolololololo Dill!!!!leagueiscrap wrote:Lol head to head or played in similar time slots the AFL wins nearly every time.pussycat wrote:Our ratings speak for themselves. Fewer games higher ratings Wow just Wow!Fred wrote:No no no... you are suppossed to find sonething that supports your argument that your code is superior lol. Dig around there must be something. Maybe point to origin ..... or to prime time v non prime time.Terry wrote:It looks like the fumbleball GF outrated the RL equivalent. Congratulations to the fumblers - it's been a few years but well done on this occasion.
See fumblers - that's how an adult handles these things. No ifs, no buts, no excuses.
Its true, you have had higher ratings matches this year but that simply means you've had a lot more lower rating matches.
The gap/chasm between the haves and the have nots is getting wider.
Keep up the but buts & fools gold pissycat
if you really did have fewer games but higher ratings why are your games repeatedly outrated by the AFL in comparable formats.pussycat wrote:Our ratings speak for themselves. Fewer games higher ratings Wow just Wow!Fred wrote:No no no... you are suppossed to find sonething that supports your argument that your code is superior lol. Dig around there must be something. Maybe point to origin ..... or to prime time v non prime time.Terry wrote:It looks like the fumbleball GF outrated the RL equivalent. Congratulations to the fumblers - it's been a few years but well done on this occasion.
See fumblers - that's how an adult handles these things. No ifs, no buts, no excuses.
Its true, you have had higher ratings matches this year but that simply means you've had a lot more lower rating matches.
The gap/chasm between the haves and the have nots is getting wider.
