Talking Footy

can anyone figure if a GWS v SWANS Grand final... ( would the Melbourne public turned off on it ??)

because now your looking at one of the biggest AFL rating G.F yet..

The AFL final was between 2 of the AFLs least supported clubs. You guys rave about how the giants have no support. The dogs have a very small following in Melbourne. The end result was the second highest rating non GF game in AFL history. This was despite half the game being played outside prime time

Youve been well beaten in every final this year.

The AFL STV figures have been massive for every game, well and above the NRL who seem to think they dominate payTV. How bazaar.

Im struggling to think of a positive for you guys

NlolRL wrote:

The AFL final was between 2 of the AFLs least supported clubs. You guys rave about how the giants have no support. The dogs have a very small following in Melbourne. The end result was the second highest rating non GF game in AFL history. This was despite half the game being played outside prime time

Youve been well beaten in every final this year.

The AFL STV figures have been massive for every game, well and above the NRL who seem to think they dominate payTV. How bazaar.

Im struggling to think of a positive for you guys

The Game was the highest rating final in the final series..

everyone wanted Western Bulldogs to win..
look at the Melbourne figure #Huge.

The NRL figures have been below par..

still rated well..

Storm v Canberra game rating 1.6mill ( pretty good I say)

For a prelim final with boosted Melbouene figures its average. A number of AFL final beat it easily.

Of course the game was our highest rating of the series. Thats what prelim finals tend to do every year

& still at the end of the season RL will have had more viewers for the year . Gold gold gold

bahaha it all comes down to the scheduling and fixtures spazza
why is it head to head the AFL flogs the NRLOL on nearly every occasion

you wont wake actual reality in to account like usual with you lot

ENGLISh please .

You can't dispute the fact that RL has more viewers .
Lol GOLD for RL
AGAIN .

AFLcrap1 wrote:

ENGLISh please .

You can't dispute the fact that RL has more viewers .
Lol GOLD for RL
AGAIN .

bahahaha
all because of scheduling

head to head AFL wins hands down nearly every time

AFLcrap1 wrote:

& still at the end of the season RL will have had more viewers for the year . Gold gold gold

Lol. Face it, the AFL have won 8 finals games on a row. All of them a fair and even comparison of one game v another under similar conditions.

Comparing the entire season with differences in the number of rounds, games, and schedules is meaningless by comparison

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

& still at the end of the season RL will have had more viewers for the year . Gold gold gold

Lol. Face it, the AFL have won 8 finals games on a row. All of them a fair and even comparison of one game v another under similar conditions.

Comparing the entire season with differences in the number of rounds, games, and schedules is meaningless by comparison

Are you serious or delirious pal????? So do you think Coles or Woollies look at the bottom line or hand pick their best performing brands and proclaim victory?? It's the bottom line pal, always was, always will be. The fumblers finals series has been good to them. The NRL's overall package will win the day - that's what ya call facts ya nong!!!

Terry wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

& still at the end of the season RL will have had more viewers for the year . Gold gold gold

Lol. Face it, the AFL have won 8 finals games on a row. All of them a fair and even comparison of one game v another under similar conditions.

Comparing the entire season with differences in the number of rounds, games, and schedules is meaningless by comparison

Are you serious or delirious pal????? So do you think Coles or Woollies look at the bottom line or hand pick their best performing brands and proclaim victory?? It's the bottom line pal, always was, always will be. The fumblers finals series has been good to them. The NRL's overall package will win the day - that's what ya call facts ya nong!!!

Thats why head to head the AFL has flogged the nrlol on most occasions!

Lolololololololololoon

leagueiscrap wrote:

Terry wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

& still at the end of the season RL will have had more viewers for the year . Gold gold gold

Lol. Face it, the AFL have won 8 finals games on a row. All of them a fair and even comparison of one game v another under similar conditions.

Comparing the entire season with differences in the number of rounds, games, and schedules is meaningless by comparison

Are you serious or delirious pal????? So do you think Coles or Woollies look at the bottom line or hand pick their best performing brands and proclaim victory?? It's the bottom line pal, always was, always will be. The fumblers finals series has been good to them. The NRL's overall package will win the day - that's what ya call facts ya nong!!!

Thats why head to head the AFL has flogged the nrlol on most occasions!

Lolololololololololoon

"On most occasions", pal your credibility is lower than a snakes belly lololololol. You are a clueless fumbleball zealot. You will lie, obfuscate and contort any argument. Basically you're the village idiot of this site lololololol. Actually the fumbleball village has a greater percentage of idiots than any other "villages" in Australia lolololol. Dills !!!!!

Terry wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

& still at the end of the season RL will have had more viewers for the year . Gold gold gold

Lol. Face it, the AFL have won 8 finals games on a row. All of them a fair and even comparison of one game v another under similar conditions.

Comparing the entire season with differences in the number of rounds, games, and schedules is meaningless by comparison

Are you serious or delirious pal????? So do you think Coles or Woollies look at the bottom line or hand pick their best performing brands and proclaim victory?? It's the bottom line pal, always was, always will be. The fumblers finals series has been good to them. The NRL's overall package will win the day - that's what ya call facts ya nong!!!

Lol, bottom line is the AFL earn more per season. Thanks Terry

NlolRL wrote:

Terry wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

& still at the end of the season RL will have had more viewers for the year . Gold gold gold

Lol. Face it, the AFL have won 8 finals games on a row. All of them a fair and even comparison of one game v another under similar conditions.

Comparing the entire season with differences in the number of rounds, games, and schedules is meaningless by comparison

Are you serious or delirious pal????? So do you think Coles or Woollies look at the bottom line or hand pick their best performing brands and proclaim victory?? It's the bottom line pal, always was, always will be. The fumblers finals series has been good to them. The NRL's overall package will win the day - that's what ya call facts ya nong!!!

Lol, bottom line is the AFL earn more per season. Thanks Terry

Please see Wookies post above - Another year of RL domination lolololololol. So of course you now talk about 'earn' rather than the point of the topic lolololol - what a mob of tossers lololololol....suck it up sweetheart lolololol

Isnt the bottom line what you just claimed? Dickhead