Talking Footy

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Together they make more than 5 NRL teams.

and yet ......
together they make the entire combined financial losses of all 16 NRL clubs

Prove it

Given 15 of 16 NRL clubs make a loss, and the storm are short 12m per year, I think you're a little off.

Storm haven't lost a dime in 4 years d head

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

and yet ......
together they make the entire combined financial losses of all 16 NRL clubs

Prove it

Given 15 of 16 NRL clubs make a loss, and the storm are short 12m per year, I think you're a little off.

Storm haven't lost a dime in 4 years d head

They fall way short every year, but are bailed out by their owners

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Prove it

Given 15 of 16 NRL clubs make a loss, and the storm are short 12m per year, I think you're a little off.

Storm haven't lost a dime in 4 years d head

They fall way short every year, but are bailed out by their owners

they haven't been in the red since 2008 ... every cent news has spent in expenditure on them , has been returned in revenue & .... some change on top too.

end of

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Storm haven't lost a dime in 4 years d head

They fall way short every year, but are bailed out by their owners

they haven't been in the red since 2008 ... every cent news has spent in expenditure on them , has been returned in revenue & .... some change on top too.

end of

How the hell would you know since they don't release their financial details. What we do know is after they cheated their financial viability was questioned and it was revealed they rely on 12m of private ownership funding a year just to survive.

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

They fall way short every year, but are bailed out by their owners

they haven't been in the red since 2008 ... every cent news has spent in expenditure on them , has been returned in revenue & .... some change on top too.

end of

How the hell would you know since they don't release their financial details. :

and yet you seem to know they lose 12m every year based on nothing more then an article which clearly states .. the 12m is expenditure ... not a loss
I mean .. what sort of fuckwit are you ?

Storm .... self sufficient

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

they haven't been in the red since 2008 ... every cent news has spent in expenditure on them , has been returned in revenue & .... some change on top too.

end of

How the hell would you know since they don't release their financial details. :

and yet you seem to know they lose 12m every year based on nothing more then an article which clearly states .. the 12m is expenditure ... not a loss
I mean .. what sort of fuckwit are you ?

Storm .... self sufficient

15 of 16 nRL clubs make losses each year. Fact. Unless Melbourne are the 1 club that actually make money in the nRL (which they aren't) then once again you are wrong. Do you get tired of being wrong Raiderdave?

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

How the hell would you know since they don't release their financial details. :

and yet you seem to know they lose 12m every year based on nothing more then an article which clearly states .. the 12m is expenditure ... not a loss
I mean .. what sort of fuckwit are you ?

Storm .... self sufficient

15 of 16 nRL clubs make losses each year. Fact. Unless Melbourne are the 1 club that actually make money in the nRL (which they aren't) then once again you are wrong. Do you get tired of being wrong Raiderdave?

fact ... ah no

its the inaccurate ramblings of a News Ltd jurno told to print lies & BS about the NRL & its clubs
it wouldn't be 8 NRL clubs losing money each year ***********

& they're rank amateurs when it comes to losing money compared to ol poort powerfailure .... eh spewie

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

they haven't been in the red since 2008 ... every cent news has spent in expenditure on them , has been returned in revenue & .... some change on top too.

end of

How the hell would you know since they don't release their financial details. :

and yet you seem to know they lose 12m every year based on nothing more then an article which clearly states .. the 12m is expenditure ... not a loss
I mean .. what sort of fuckwit are you ?

Storm .... self sufficient

Like I said in my post dumbarse, their details were revealed and their viability questioned. It highlighted the fact that news forked out 60 odd million in 5 years. Why would they do that if the storm were self sufficient?

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

and yet you seem to know they lose 12m every year based on nothing more then an article which clearly states .. the 12m is expenditure ... not a loss
I mean .. what sort of fuckwit are you ?

Storm .... self sufficient

15 of 16 nRL clubs make losses each year. Fact. Unless Melbourne are the 1 club that actually make money in the nRL (which they aren't) then once again you are wrong. Do you get tired of being wrong Raiderdave?

fact ... ah no

its the inaccurate ramblings of a News Ltd jurno told to print lies & BS about the NRL & its clubs
it wouldn't be 8 NRL clubs losing money each year ***********

& they're rank amateurs when it comes to losing money compared to ol poort powerfailure .... eh spewie

More conspiracy!

Tin foil hat man --------> RaiderDope

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

and yet you seem to know they lose 12m every year based on nothing more then an article which clearly states .. the 12m is expenditure ... not a loss
I mean .. what sort of fuckwit are you ?

Storm .... self sufficient

15 of 16 nRL clubs make losses each year. Fact. Unless Melbourne are the 1 club that actually make money in the nRL (which they aren't) then once again you are wrong. Do you get tired of being wrong Raiderdave?

fact ... ah no

its the inaccurate ramblings of a News Ltd jurno told to print lies & BS about the NRL & its clubs

But when the same company posts lies and BS about Port's finances it's all correct?

You fucking twat, suck it up.

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

and yet you seem to know they lose 12m every year based on nothing more then an article which clearly states .. the 12m is expenditure ... not a loss
I mean .. what sort of fuckwit are you ?

Storm .... self sufficient

15 of 16 nRL clubs make losses each year. Fact. Unless Melbourne are the 1 club that actually make money in the nRL (which they aren't) then once again you are wrong. Do you get tired of being wrong Raiderdave?

fact ... ah no

its the inaccurate ramblings of a News Ltd jurno told to print lies & BS about the NRL & its clubs

But when the same company posts lies and BS about Port's finances it's all correct?

.[/quote]


Poort Poweroutage released their own financial situation d head .... news ltd ( & other news outlets ) just reported it

gawd help me ... you just appear stupider with every post

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

How the hell would you know since they don't release their financial details. :

and yet you seem to know they lose 12m every year based on nothing more then an article which clearly states .. the 12m is expenditure ... not a loss
I mean .. what sort of fuckwit are you ?

Storm .... self sufficient

It highlighted the fact that news forked out 60 odd million in 5 years. Why would they do that if the storm were self sufficient?

all it said was news supplies funds for their costs

well of course they do
who else would ?



marcus .. what a tool

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

and yet you seem to know they lose 12m every year based on nothing more then an article which clearly states .. the 12m is expenditure ... not a loss
I mean .. what sort of fuckwit are you ?

Storm .... self sufficient

15 of 16 nRL clubs make losses each year. Fact. Unless Melbourne are the 1 club that actually make money in the nRL (which they aren't) then once again you are wrong. Do you get tired of being wrong Raiderdave?

fact ... ah no

its the inaccurate ramblings of a News Ltd jurno told to print lies & BS about the NRL & its clubs

But when the same company posts lies and BS about Port's finances it's all correct?

.[/quote]


Poort Poweroutage released their own financial situation d head .... news ltd ( & other news outlets ) just reported it

gawd help me ... you just appear stupider with every post [/quote]
You dick head. Port had no idea where the 6.3 million figure came from until it was revealed that the News Ltd journo removed the equalisation funds that Port (and 14 other clubs) get from the total. Only journos publishing for a paper with an agenda would remove this from a financial statement.

You have terrible double standards when it comes to News Ltd content Raiderdave. It really is pathetic.

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

and yet you seem to know they lose 12m every year based on nothing more then an article which clearly states .. the 12m is expenditure ... not a loss
I mean .. what sort of fuckwit are you ?

Storm .... self sufficient

15 of 16 nRL clubs make losses each year. Fact. Unless Melbourne are the 1 club that actually make money in the nRL (which they aren't) then once again you are wrong. Do you get tired of being wrong Raiderdave?

fact ... ah no

its the inaccurate ramblings of a News Ltd jurno told to print lies & BS about the NRL & its clubs

But when the same company posts lies and BS about Port's finances it's all correct?

.[/quote]


Poort Poweroutage released their own financial situation d head .... news ltd ( & other news outlets ) just reported it

gawd help me ... you just appear stupider with every post [/quote]
You dick head. Port had no idea where the 6.3 million figure came from until it was revealed that the News Ltd journo removed the equalisation funds that Port (and 14 other clubs) get from the total. Only journos publishing for a paper with an agenda would remove this from a financial statement.

You have terrible double standards when it comes to News Ltd content Raiderdave. It really is pathetic.[/quote]

but but but

when will the excuses stop .... when ?

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

and yet you seem to know they lose 12m every year based on nothing more then an article which clearly states .. the 12m is expenditure ... not a loss
I mean .. what sort of fuckwit are you ?

Storm .... self sufficient

15 of 16 nRL clubs make losses each year. Fact. Unless Melbourne are the 1 club that actually make money in the nRL (which they aren't) then once again you are wrong. Do you get tired of being wrong Raiderdave?

fact ... ah no

its the inaccurate ramblings of a News Ltd jurno told to print lies & BS about the NRL & its clubs

But when the same company posts lies and BS about Port's finances it's all correct?

.[/quote]


Poort Poweroutage released their own financial situation d head .... news ltd ( & other news outlets ) just reported it

gawd help me ... you just appear stupider with every post [/quote]
You dick head. Port had no idea where the 6.3 million figure came from until it was revealed that the News Ltd journo removed the equalisation funds that Port (and 14 other clubs) get from the total. Only journos publishing for a paper with an agenda would remove this from a financial statement.

You have terrible double standards when it comes to News Ltd content Raiderdave. It really is pathetic.[/quote]

but but but

when will the excuses stop .... when ? [/quote]
15 of 16 nRL clubs make a loss.