Talking Footy

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

NRL 1st Final: 1.195m (Syd 835k Bri 360k) + 658 regionals + GEM 178k (Mel 105k Ade 20k Per 53k) + Sky 103k = 2.13m + gem regionals

2nd final: 1.06m (Syd 696k Bri 373k) + 649 regionals + GEM 158k (Mel 111k Ade 7k Per 41k) + SKY 102k = 1,97m + gem regionals

Hmmm, where are the 750k regionals? :>::

You would of had plenty of practice at getting beat , I didn't realise you 'd be such a sore loser.

The 650 regionals are for the Ch 9 metro figure only the Gem figures wont be known. Figures from the Southern States are generaly not far of a third. So once again you've been left with egg all over your face :_<> :_<> :_<>

Youre actually serious? I thought you were taking the piss! What GEM regionals are you expecting? Regional TAM rates zero for the NRL week after week in Victoria

http://www.regionaltam.com.au/?page_id=19#

zero!

Do you actually think the NRL get no regionals from the Southern states - just metro viewers?

Origin 1 ,this year, shown on ch9 not gem, surprise - suprise 120 regional viewers from the Vic. enjoy that silver.

pussycat wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

NRL 1st Final: 1.195m (Syd 835k Bri 360k) + 658 regionals + GEM 178k (Mel 105k Ade 20k Per 53k) + Sky 103k = 2.13m + gem regionals

2nd final: 1.06m (Syd 696k Bri 373k) + 649 regionals + GEM 158k (Mel 111k Ade 7k Per 41k) + SKY 102k = 1,97m + gem regionals

Hmmm, where are the 750k regionals? :>::

You would of had plenty of practice at getting beat , I didn't realise you 'd be such a sore loser.

The 650 regionals are for the Ch 9 metro figure only the Gem figures wont be known. Figures from the Southern States are generaly not far of a third. So once again you've been left with egg all over your face :_<> :_<> :_<>

Youre actually serious? I thought you were taking the piss! What GEM regionals are you expecting? Regional TAM rates zero for the NRL week after week in Victoria

http://www.regionaltam.com.au/?page_id=19#

zero!

Do you actually think the NRL get no regionals from the Southern states - just metro viewers?

Origin 1 ,this year, shown on ch9 not gem, surprise - suprise 120 regional viewers from the Vic. enjoy that silver.

yeah, i do. Melbourne have an NRL team, not regional Victoria. RL is barely played at all in regional Vic, SA, WA and TAS. If 4.5m in a city with a team average 30k youre looking at 1-2k id say

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

NRL 1st Final: 1.195m (Syd 835k Bri 360k) + 658 regionals + GEM 178k (Mel 105k Ade 20k Per 53k) + Sky 103k = 2.13m + gem regionals

2nd final: 1.06m (Syd 696k Bri 373k) + 649 regionals + GEM 158k (Mel 111k Ade 7k Per 41k) + SKY 102k = 1,97m + gem regionals

Hmmm, where are the 750k regionals? :>::

You would of had plenty of practice at getting beat , I didn't realise you 'd be such a sore loser.

The 650 regionals are for the Ch 9 metro figure only the Gem figures wont be known. Figures from the Southern States are generaly not far of a third. So once again you've been left with egg all over your face :_<> :_<> :_<>

Youre actually serious? I thought you were taking the piss! What GEM regionals are you expecting? Regional TAM rates zero for the NRL week after week in Victoria

http://www.regionaltam.com.au/?page_id=19#

zero!

Do you actually think the NRL get no regionals from the Southern states - just metro viewers?

Origin 1 ,this year, shown on ch9 not gem, surprise - suprise 120 regional viewers from the Vic. enjoy that silver.

yeah, i do. Melbourne have an NRL team, not regional Victoria. RL is barely played at all in regional Vic, SA, WA and TAS
none of your finals have rated at all in Vic according to Regional tam, zero. If ratings of 1.5m get zero what would 2m get, 2k?

Then Why did they get 120 vic regionals for Origin when the game was shown on Channel 9.?????

pussycat wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

NRL 1st Final: 1.195m (Syd 835k Bri 360k) + 658 regionals + GEM 178k (Mel 105k Ade 20k Per 53k) + Sky 103k = 2.13m + gem regionals

2nd final: 1.06m (Syd 696k Bri 373k) + 649 regionals + GEM 158k (Mel 111k Ade 7k Per 41k) + SKY 102k = 1,97m + gem regionals

Hmmm, where are the 750k regionals? :>::

You would of had plenty of practice at getting beat , I didn't realise you 'd be such a sore loser.

The 650 regionals are for the Ch 9 metro figure only the Gem figures wont be known. Figures from the Southern States are generaly not far of a third. So once again you've been left with egg all over your face :_<> :_<> :_<>

Youre actually serious? I thought you were taking the piss! What GEM regionals are you expecting? Regional TAM rates zero for the NRL week after week in Victoria

http://www.regionaltam.com.au/?page_id=19#

zero!

Do you actually think the NRL get no regionals from the Southern states - just metro viewers?

Origin 1 ,this year, shown on ch9 not gem, surprise - suprise 120 regional viewers from the Vic. enjoy that silver.

yeah, i do. Melbourne have an NRL team, not regional Victoria. RL is barely played at all in regional Vic, SA, WA and TAS
none of your finals have rated at all in Vic according to Regional tam, zero. If ratings of 1.5m get zero what would 2m get, 2k?

Then Why did they get 120 vic regionals for Origin when the game was shown on Channel 9.?????

which is what, 20% of Melbourne? These finals have rated nothing like that in Melbourne, and nor will the regionals

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

NRL 1st Final: 1.195m (Syd 835k Bri 360k) + 658 regionals + GEM 178k (Mel 105k Ade 20k Per 53k) + Sky 103k = 2.13m + gem regionals

2nd final: 1.06m (Syd 696k Bri 373k) + 649 regionals + GEM 158k (Mel 111k Ade 7k Per 41k) + SKY 102k = 1,97m + gem regionals

Hmmm, where are the 750k regionals? :>::

You would of had plenty of practice at getting beat , I didn't realise you 'd be such a sore loser.

The 650 regionals are for the Ch 9 metro figure only the Gem figures wont be known. Figures from the Southern States are generaly not far of a third. So once again you've been left with egg all over your face :_<> :_<> :_<>

Youre actually serious? I thought you were taking the piss! What GEM regionals are you expecting? Regional TAM rates zero for the NRL week after week in Victoria

http://www.regionaltam.com.au/?page_id=19#

zero!

Do you actually think the NRL get no regionals from the Southern states - just metro viewers?

Origin 1 ,this year, shown on ch9 not gem, surprise - suprise 120 regional viewers from the Vic. enjoy that silver.

yeah, i do. Melbourne have an NRL team, not regional Victoria. RL is barely played at all in regional Vic, SA, WA and TAS
none of your finals have rated at all in Vic according to Regional tam, zero. If ratings of 1.5m get zero what would 2m get, 2k?

Then Why did they get 120 vic regionals for Origin when the game was shown on Channel 9.?????

which is what, 20% of Melbourne? These finals have rated nothing like that in Melbourne, and nor will the regionals

The Metro figure was over 400 - just how far over dont recall. At least your admitting they exist now thats a start.

The lower the sampling rate the less accurate the tam readings a going to be

pussycat wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

NRL 1st Final: 1.195m (Syd 835k Bri 360k) + 658 regionals + GEM 178k (Mel 105k Ade 20k Per 53k) + Sky 103k = 2.13m + gem regionals

2nd final: 1.06m (Syd 696k Bri 373k) + 649 regionals + GEM 158k (Mel 111k Ade 7k Per 41k) + SKY 102k = 1,97m + gem regionals

Hmmm, where are the 750k regionals? :>::

You would of had plenty of practice at getting beat , I didn't realise you 'd be such a sore loser.

The 650 regionals are for the Ch 9 metro figure only the Gem figures wont be known. Figures from the Southern States are generaly not far of a third. So once again you've been left with egg all over your face :_<> :_<> :_<>

Youre actually serious? I thought you were taking the piss! What GEM regionals are you expecting? Regional TAM rates zero for the NRL week after week in Victoria

http://www.regionaltam.com.au/?page_id=19#

zero!

Do you actually think the NRL get no regionals from the Southern states - just metro viewers?

Origin 1 ,this year, shown on ch9 not gem, surprise - suprise 120 regional viewers from the Vic. enjoy that silver.

yeah, i do. Melbourne have an NRL team, not regional Victoria. RL is barely played at all in regional Vic, SA, WA and TAS
none of your finals have rated at all in Vic according to Regional tam, zero. If ratings of 1.5m get zero what would 2m get, 2k?

Then Why did they get 120 vic regionals for Origin when the game was shown on Channel 9.?????

which is what, 20% of Melbourne? These finals have rated nothing like that in Melbourne, and nor will the regionals

The Metro figure was over 400 - just how far over dont recall. At least your admitting they exist now thats a start.

The lower the sampling rate the less accurate the tam readings a going to be

i think thye were in thr 500k range so the regionals are 1/5th or so. makes sense given the regional population is about 1/4 to 1/5. so even with the top rating finals youre getting 20k max.

youre amazingly cockahoop for someone who has only won one of three finals weeks, and will probably lose the 4th

Why would I be cock -a -hoop ? we've won nearly everything this year - I would be counting my chickens just yet over the GF if I was you - and by the way the Metro figure for that match was 426k or 28%.

even at 1/5 of gem its over 700k .

The estimate given was 650-800 so what was your point any rate???

pussycat wrote:

Why would I be cock -a -hoop ? we've won nearly everything this year - I would be counting my chickens just yet over the GF if I was you - and by the way the Metro figure for that match was 426k or 28%.

even at 1/5 of gem its over 700k .

The estimate given was 650-800 so what was your point any rate???

the AFL had the highest rated game on PTV and will most likely have the highest on FTA with the GF. they also had the biggest total.

what are you on about with gem? > it rates 30k for most games in melbourne. 1/5th of that is nothing

pussycat wrote:

Why would I be cock -a -hoop ? we've won nearly everything this year - I would be counting my chickens just yet over the GF if I was you - and by the way the Metro figure for that match was 426k or 28%.

even at 1/5 of gem its over 700k .

The estimate given was 650-800 so what was your point any rate???

This bloke (NlolRL) is a deadset dead duck..............................he is given a estimate and even when the regional's fall within that figure he has a go................wow what a ******.

:_<> :_<>

Ch9 got the best ratings by Average, highest and total. enjoy that silver

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Why would I be cock -a -hoop ? we've won nearly everything this year - I would be counting my chickens just yet over the GF if I was you - and by the way the Metro figure for that match was 426k or 28%.

even at 1/5 of gem its over 700k .

The estimate given was 650-800 so what was your point any rate???

the AFL had the highest rated game on PTV and will most likely have the highest on FTA with the GF. they also had the biggest total.

what are you on about with gem? > it rates 30k for most games in melbourne. 1/5th of that is nothing

Durdurdurdammmmmdrurdururu........................lol..... :_<> :_<>




:_<> :_<> :_<>

Such a good belly laugh.... =D> :_<>

using that little pea brain of your's, does that look like 30k to you?

Fri TV #NRLfinals Nine 1.195m (Syd 835k Bri 360k) GEM 178k (Mel 105k Ade 20k Per 53k)

Sat TV #NRLfinals Nine 1.06m (Syd 696k Bri 373k) GEM 158k (Mel 111k Ade 7k Per 41k)

????

eelofwest wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Why would I be cock -a -hoop ? we've won nearly everything this year - I would be counting my chickens just yet over the GF if I was you - and by the way the Metro figure for that match was 426k or 28%.

even at 1/5 of gem its over 700k .

The estimate given was 650-800 so what was your point any rate???

the AFL had the highest rated game on PTV and will most likely have the highest on FTA with the GF. they also had the biggest total.

what are you on about with gem? > it rates 30k for most games in melbourne. 1/5th of that is nothing

Durdurdurdammmmmdrurdururu........................lol..... :_<> :_<>




:_<> :_<> :_<>

Such a good belly laugh.... =D> :_<>

using that little pea brain of your's, does that look like 30k to you?

Fri TV #NRLfinals Nine 1.195m (Syd 835k Bri 360k) GEM 178k (Mel 105k Ade 20k Per 53k)

Sat TV #NRLfinals Nine 1.06m (Syd 696k Bri 373k) GEM 158k (Mel 111k Ade 7k Per 41k)

????

what wookie said

Haha rodney, you flip.

The_Wookie wrote:

pussycat wrote:

Why would I be cock -a -hoop ? we've won nearly everything this year - I would be counting my chickens just yet over the GF if I was you - and by the way the Metro figure for that match was 426k or 28%.

even at 1/5 of gem its over 700k .

The estimate given was 650-800 so what was your point any rate???

Its not going to be 1/5th of gem

Take the Storms Elimination final -

Sun TV #NRLfinals Nine 738k (Syd 398k Mel 114k Bri 226k) GEM 7k (Ade 2k Per 7k) 436 reg week 50 NZ total 1231

RegionalTAM breaks down the regional ratings for that game to show 13k in regionals. Bear in mind this game was shown on Nine, not GEM, and rated less than 12% of the metro audience.

And there sample market market to get that 13k was probably based upon 3 or 4 people. If the ratio of people watching AFL (metro to regional) viewers is around a third it would stand to reason leaggue viewers would have the same ratio - a lower number but the ratio would'nt change.

It feels good knowing the AFL Grand Final is the highest Rated Show of the Year, beating out all 3 state of origins. in metro

Seeing as our code is more popular than your code in metro, only proves that AFL fans are classy sophisticated city workers while leaguetards are nothing more than wheat eating hillbillies