Talking Footy

AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Aug 25, 2019 12:59 pm

Can't wait to hear the old fave
The crowd is on the camera side
Well there would have to be about 6k crammed in there because there'd be lucky to be 1 k around the rest of the ground .
Luckily for us the camera panned to that side when a fumbler was walking off .
Lol lol lol

On that post with the pic - the standing room area (that surround much of the ground) can be seen. Again, if you placed all the people in the seats in 30 percent of the seats -the seats would be full in that 30 percent I feel. Took everyone from the corporate area, the standing room areas, the people who sit in the bars, and the kids who play kick to kick (don't ask me why they go to the footy to do that)... then it would easily be 7000.

From the shots that AFLCrap provided us with I was able to make out several eatery tents under the stairs. I think Fred was right, there was at least 7 thousand there. And don't forget all those people that bought tickets only to have there buses get lost on the way to the ground.

League loonies remember when these photos were posted and they were not sufficient enough to be used as evidence as questionable crowd numbers

Deself irony and hypocrisy at its finest

AFLcrap1 wrote: Mon Aug 26, 2019 12:05 pm

Please show proof of these fudged numbers you claim
Thanks VI

Can you show us come credible proof that the crowd numbers are fudged?

Nothing for an nrlol game is ever good enough yet all we have is one of your tin foil had conspiracies

notaleaguefan wrote: Mon Aug 26, 2019 7:29 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Mon Aug 26, 2019 12:05 pm

Please show proof of these fudged numbers you claim
Thanks VI

Can you show us come credible proof that the crowd numbers are fudged?

Nothing for an nrlol game is ever good enough yet all we have is one of your tin foil had conspiracies

You are still too stupid to get it
Even after it's been explained over & over .
There's a big difference between scoffing/ laughing etc at the announced crowd figure .
Nothing wrong with questioning it .

You continually post that it's proven for recent RL games
Yet you can't show proof ever .
You're asked repeatedly yet can't
Simpleton
If you're going yo claim proven it really helps to have a source .

By all means crapper mock crowds with zero proof! Just don’t you and your fellow looney league buddies go in a hysteria of denial when fans question leagues suss crowd numbers!

This has been proven constantly the case

The_Wookie wrote: Mon Aug 26, 2019 10:26 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote: Mon Aug 26, 2019 9:38 pm

You are still too stupid to get it
Even after it's been explained over & over .
There's a big difference between scoffing/ laughing etc at the announced crowd figure .
Nothing wrong with questioning it .

apparently that only applies when you league types scoff and laugh. Everyone else needs proof apparently.

I have no problem with scoffing ..laughing at Rl crowds .

That's part of the fight club .
It's when the claim is continiously made that there's proof or it has been proven yet when asked ..
This proof is never forthcoming .
& you then get 5 pages of deflecting clogging up threads that's a problem .

See post above ...proven yet again apparently ..

I won't bother asking for proof for about the 100th time as the poster is a pathological liar .
Who you seem to be in protection mode with at the moment
Problem was fixed by Smith .
No proof since 2012-13
Yet the claims are continiously made .

Quit deflecting
you go in a mental fit of denial and demand for proof, then it’s never good enough! When any ones questions nrlol crowds
Then place the tin foil hat on and claim the gws and gcs or China games are fudged with zero evidence and expect every one to believe your conspiracy!

Suck it up stop being a hypocrite otherwise your fellow looney buddy will have to dish you a time out

Now there is a loon that has a bigger dummy spit than you & proves he is a hypocrite like all the other nrlol fans

On the wash up... only one code has admitted to fudging crowds. That’s a fact. Doesn’t matter when or where ... they still did it... and whilst they say they have addressed it.... how do we really know ?

Fred wrote: Tue Aug 27, 2019 3:05 pm

On the wash up... only one code has admitted to fudging crowds. That’s a fact. Doesn’t matter when or where ... they still did it... and whilst they say they have addressed it.... how do we really know ?

Well Freddo........you have finally said something that is correct. "Only one code has admitted to fudging crowds".
Yep. Correct. Well done Freddo!!!

Of course the fumbling game admits nothing pal. Check out Gilty standing in front of thousands of empty seats and telling the faithful the Shanghai game was a sell out lololololol. He's the Chemical Ali of sport!!

But well done to RL many years ago telling the truth and forever rectifying it. And well done Freddo for your accurate truth defying post!!!

Bouquets all round!!!!

with 1 game in hand for the titans >> who will win the averages between the two

Just counting real home games and not home games played on other grounds, I would expect the Suns to win, just, currently 11,834 to 11,066.

If the non home home games are counted, only because of the magical mystery of counting round. the Titans would win 11,616 to 11,417 unless the Titans really crap out in its final Robina game, possible but would need to be bad. Like 9,200 which would be their 2nd lowest Robina crowd for the season.

Quolls2019 wrote: Tue Aug 27, 2019 6:31 pm

Just counting real home games and not home games played on other grounds, I would expect the Suns to win, just, currently 11,834 to 11,066.

If the non home home games are counted, only because of the magical mystery of counting round. the Titans would win 11,616 to 11,417 unless the Titans really crap out in its final Robina game, possible but would need to be bad. Like 9,200 which would be their 2nd lowest Robina crowd for the season.

Did you see the ground last week? Those figures are worthless.

They are the figures given and the ones that have to be used unless you have more accurate ones.

Quolls2019 wrote: Tue Aug 27, 2019 8:23 pm

They are the figures given and the ones that have to be used unless you have more accurate ones.

Yeah, replace last weeks number at GC with 2,500.