Talking Footy

Lol
Whoooooooosh

he NRL, dependence is virtually complete. The Canterbury Bulldogs are the standout, having raised $77 million from pokies in 2014 out of $87 million in revenue.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/op...m ... 194e6806fb

around half of the AFL clubs earn more in sponsorship alone! even membership as well

& the leagues clubs are still crying to the NRLOL commission for money! then your shit house codes commission neads to take out loans and advances to the tune of 80 million to pay the clubs

its like the Leagues club has a NRLLOL team for shits and giggles

Whoooooooosh

But but we have a billion dollar broadcast deal!

That article deserves a thread in it self

The_Wookie wrote: Wed Aug 09, 2017 6:45 pm

Thanks Wook. Very quick of the mark with this 'story'. How ya goin' with the last 2 weeks ratings????

so no comment on the thread topic, just off to ratings. Sounds like a typical throwball fan

NlolRL wrote: Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:08 pm

so no comment on the thread topic, just off to ratings. Sounds like a typical throwball fan

Well LOL, how can we comment when we don't know anything?

I thought the leagues club could just cover the debts of the nrl clubs ? Why can't they do it with the bulldogs.

Really? Must only be regionals, I see fox and FTA are all over the place. How about your best estimates Wookster? Or just give us what you've got.

Fred wrote: Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:53 pm

I thought the leagues club could just cover the debts of the nrl clubs ? Why can't they do it with the bulldogs.

the Debts of the bulldogs...??

It is about the salary cap not debt of Canterbury..

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:21 am

Fred wrote: Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:53 pm

I thought the leagues club could just cover the debts of the nrl clubs ? Why can't they do it with the bulldogs.

the Debts of the bulldogs...??

It is about the salary cap not debt of Canterbury..

Poor 'ol Fred totally missing the point again lololollololol. Dear oh dear.

I think you are obsessed with me . I'm flattered and all.

Terry wrote: Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:30 am

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:21 am

Fred wrote: Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:53 pm

I thought the leagues club could just cover the debts of the nrl clubs ? Why can't they do it with the bulldogs.

the Debts of the bulldogs...??

It is about the salary cap not debt of Canterbury..

Poor 'ol Fred totally missing the point again lololollololol. Dear oh dear.

The video I watched was on about how clubs needed money and used the bulldogs as an example. ...... wait for it.....

Fred wrote: Thu Aug 10, 2017 11:29 am

Terry wrote: Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:30 am

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:21 am

the Debts of the bulldogs...??

It is about the salary cap not debt of Canterbury..

Poor 'ol Fred totally missing the point again lololollololol. Dear oh dear.

The video I watched was on about how clubs needed money and used the bulldogs as an example. ...... wait for it.....

ok fair enough,

Of course the clubs want more money,
Rugby league is a business.. there trying to push every dollar out of the NRL>>
no matter how good your leagues clubs are going, if there is money on offer you going to pursue.

as I am aware there are currently 3 clubs without leagues club backing
Titans >>> could soon change with new ownership
warriors
Storm

Newcastle are now owned by wests Newcastle leagues. which owns multiple business.