Page 5 of 11
Re: Not Long Now!
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 5:01 pm
by NlolRL
Terry wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2017 4:13 pm
These fumbling dills live in such a bubble they will only believe what they want to believe. RL actually had more viewers in total and average over the year. That's a win, win!!!! Suck it up fumblers !!!!!!
not a greater average
A greater tally because of more games on TV in a longer season. The most meaningless win of all. We'll keep the highest rating final, GF, H&A game, FTA game and fox game
Re: Not Long Now!
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 7:38 pm
by AFLcrap1
Are you sure we had more games on TV .
Re: Not Long Now!
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 7:56 pm
by NlolRL
AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2017 7:38 pm
Are you sure we had more games on TV .
Well lets see.
In a fortnight the AFL will have its first round. Nationally, AFL fans will only be able to watch a maximum of 6 games for the round because all but 2 are played directly against another game (unless you watch a replay which isnt counted in Wookie's ratings). Nationally, NRL fans can watch all 8 games. So 6 AFL games v 8 NRL games. Multiply that by 25 rounds and yes, the NRL have a lot more games on TV.
Interestingly, the 6 AFL games per round account for 18 hours viewing compared to only 16 hours viewing for the NRL. Yet more hours watched somehow equals less countedviewers in the ratings. How you think that's comparable is beyond me
Re: Not Long Now!
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 8:04 pm
by AFLcrap1
Fuck off with your rot
You said that Rl HAS MORE GAMES ON TV
Now you're waffling on with bullshit to deflect .
We are talking games ...as you claimed
Not hours
Domestic season
AFL 198 games
NRL 192
Plus 3SOO
1 Anzac test
1 City v Country .
& maybe a test at the end of the season if not a RLWC year or 4 nations
So they are roughly the same amount of games .
Not more like the bullshit you posted
& that's not counting the AFL pre season televised comp which is I dunno how many games
Or the NRL 9s or charity shield or WCC
Re: Not Long Now!
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 8:12 pm
by NlolRL
AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2017 8:04 pm
Fuck off with your rot
You said that Rl HAS MORE GAMES ON TV
Now you're waffling on with bullshit to deflect .
We are talking games ...as you claimed
Not hours
and I'v qualified that comment numerous times if you'd bother checking. RL has many more games per season that their entire audience can watch. Every single game is shown in isolation. Theres no point in the AFL having 9 matches per round when no one can watch them all. Are trying to tell me that would have no effect on ratings totals? You realise that you cant be counted watching 2 games at the same time right?
Re: Not Long Now!
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 8:18 pm
by AFLcrap1
Lol you got caught out
You claimed more games on Tv .
That's bullshit
Try to post something factual
Re: Not Long Now!
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 8:25 pm
by NlolRL
AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2017 8:18 pm
Lol you got caught out
You claimed more games on Tv .
That's bullshit
Try to post something factual
LOl, caught out
Again, if youd bother to check Ive said the same thing for months. The NRL have more 'vavailable' games per year for their audience. About 50 - 75.
Nice attempt to ignore the real point by the way
Re: Not Long Now!
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 8:37 pm
by AFLcrap1
Lol that's not what you posted above
I replied because what you posted was crap
A greater tally because of more games on TV in a longer season. The most meaningless win of all. We'll keep the highest rating final, GF, H&A game, FTA game and fox game
That's what I replied to
I corrected the obvious crap you posted .
Now your deflecting .
Re: Not Long Now!
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 8:41 pm
by NlolRL
AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2017 8:37 pm
Lol that's not what you posted above
I replied because what you posted was crap
A greater tally because of more games on TV in a longer season. The most meaningless win of all. We'll keep the highest rating final, GF, H&A game, FTA game and fox game
That's what I replied to
I corrected the obvious crap you posted .
Now your deflecting .
its not crap actually. In 2 weeks NRL fans will be able to watch more games on TV per round, all because of the TV schedules. Thats what I meant and you know it
But again you ignore the actual point of my post. Looks like youve conceded its a fair argument
Re: Not Long Now!
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 9:18 pm
by AFLcrap1
Lol
Havnt conceded anything .
I just reposted what you claimed
What you wrongly claimed
Not my fault you're too stupid to post what you meant .
Clearly stated by you
MORE GAMES ..
Bzzzzzzzz wrong .
Try again
Re: Not Long Now!
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 9:27 pm
by NlolRL
AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2017 9:18 pm
Lol
Havnt conceded anything .
I just reposted what you claimed
What you wrongly claimed
Not my fault you're too stupid to post what you meant .
Clearly stated by you
MORE GAMES ..
Bzzzzzzzz wrong .
Try again
fine. For the pedantic, more available games on TV for their market. Now address the point you gutless flog
Re: Not Long Now!
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 10:43 pm
by AFLcrap1
I have
Not my fault the AFL is so stupid it can't get its schedule right .
Re: Not Long Now!
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:13 pm
by pussycat
NlolRL wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2017 7:56 pm
AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2017 7:38 pm
Are you sure we had more games on TV .
Well lets see.
In a fortnight the AFL will have its first round. Nationally, AFL fans will only be able to watch a maximum of 6 games for the round because all but 2 are played directly against another game (unless you watch a replay which isnt counted in Wookie's ratings). Nationally, NRL fans can watch all 8 games. So 6 AFL games v 8 NRL games. Multiply that by 25 rounds and yes, the NRL have a lot more games on TV.
Interestingly, the 6 AFL games per round account for 18 hours viewing compared to only 16 hours viewing for the NRL. Yet more hours watched somehow equals less countedviewers in the ratings. How you think that's comparable is beyond me
It shouldn't be that hard to figure out that its an advantage to have each match played into its own home state.
In a round of football every AFL viewer can watch at least 4 FTA matches , the other 30% can watch 17-20 hours of AFL
every RL viewer can watch 3 FTA (Quiet often less) + half a dozen rep mates, the other 30% can watch 12 - 14 hour of NRL.
In 8 of the week from rounds 10-20 a PTV viewer can only watch 4 or 5 matches and all viewers are restricted to just 2 FTA matches.
And you should always remember if we didn't have losers we wouldn't have winners
Re: Not Long Now!
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 8:17 am
by NlolRL
AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2017 10:43 pm
I have
Not my fault the AFL is so stupid it can't get its schedule right .
well funny enough ch7, ch9 and fox wouldnt use the seasons tally to determine popularity. They know that the AFL rates higher for the most games, which is why they pay more
Re: Not Long Now!
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 8:24 am
by NlolRL
pussycat wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:13 pm
NlolRL wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2017 7:56 pm
AFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2017 7:38 pm
Are you sure we had more games on TV .
Well lets see.
In a fortnight the AFL will have its first round. Nationally, AFL fans will only be able to watch a maximum of 6 games for the round because all but 2 are played directly against another game (unless you watch a replay which isnt counted in Wookie's ratings). Nationally, NRL fans can watch all 8 games. So 6 AFL games v 8 NRL games. Multiply that by 25 rounds and yes, the NRL have a lot more games on TV.
Interestingly, the 6 AFL games per round account for 18 hours viewing compared to only 16 hours viewing for the NRL. Yet more hours watched somehow equals less countedviewers in the ratings. How you think that's comparable is beyond me
It shouldn't be that hard to figure out that its an advantage to have each match played into its own home state.
In a round of football every AFL viewer can watch at least 4 FTA matches , the other 30% can watch 17-20 hours of AFL
every RL viewer can watch 3 FTA (Quiet often less) + half a dozen rep mates, the other 30% can watch 12 - 14 hour of NRL.
In 8 of the week from rounds 10-20 a PTV viewer can only watch 4 or 5 matches and all viewers are restricted to just 2 FTA matches.
what you fail to account for is that not all FTA games are equal. The prime time games rate way more than games during the day. The AFL's 4th FTA game is a day game on Saturday which is the worst time slot, so it adds no more in ratings than a prime time Fox game.
So the NRL still have an advantage in the meaningless season tally. A measure showing the differences in scheduling, not ratings at all.
Seriously, if the NRL was more popular on TV why does it get outrated on almost every FN when it's one game v one game? Why did it get outrated on every finals game last year? You think these are anomalies? Just a coincidence?