so let's make this more simple so your little simple stupid brain can understandAFLcrap1 wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2017 3:12 pmOh my .
You just don't get it .
It's not all about football related revenue .
Jesus Christ you are dumb .
I'll let Wookie state it once again .
Please take note of the last 2 sentences.
Wookie posted
Leagues clubs exist for the purpose of supporting the local and national rugby league clubs, you idiot. Its almost the entire reason they were created the way they are. Hell some of them are so integrated they report the club revenue in the leagues club reports. And then theres the leagues clubs that are non existent....
yes there are some ponts to be made about some revenues when compared to AFL clubs - membership and gate revenues are likely to be smaller due to smaller attendances and less history, than an AFL club, but the league club issue is not one of those things in question.
The irony is you calling people out for stupidity when you carry on like a fuckwit about stuff you clearly know nothing about. Did you ever find the Melbourne Storm leagues club you invented?
If the clubs league clubs and wealthy owners, not worried about football related revenue, why are they jumping up and down and screaming for a greater share of he revenue?
The running costs of an nrlol club is that of roughly around half of an AFL club?
Why are nrlol club sponsorship revenue figures so low?
Spazza, your nrlol clubs are pathetic minnows