Talking Footy

Mal wrote:

Dear oh dear Leaguey.....I did tell you to check with your Mum before sending........LOLOLOLOL....You really have trouble with numbers don't you. For Gods sake get someone to check the table with you!!!

The ratings are up 29% on the TOTAL compared to last year. The increase represents over 8.5 million viewers. Of those 230,000 can be attributed to Perth and Adelaide......a minuscule amount of the overall increase.

The 11% Fox increase is the average increase for each game not the TOTAL which is obvioulsy massively higher as they now simulcast all FTA games. Why Wookie has done it like that I don't know.

Now I don't expect you take this all in but for the sake of your sanity please get Mummy to explain it to you wery wery wery slowly.......LOLOLOLO

leagueiscrap wrote:

Mal wrote:

Dear oh dear Leaguey.....I did tell you to check with your Mum before sending........LOLOLOLOL....You really have trouble with numbers don't you. For Gods sake get someone to check the table with you!!!

The ratings are up 29% on the TOTAL compared to last year. The increase represents over 8.5 million viewers. Of those 230,000 can be attributed to Perth and Adelaide......a minuscule amount of the overall increase.

The 11% Fox increase is the average increase for each game not the TOTAL which is obvioulsy massively higher as they now simulcast all FTA games. Why Wookie has done it like that I don't know.

Now I don't expect you take this all in but for the sake of your sanity please get Mummy to explain it to you wery wery wery slowly.......LOLOLOLO

so basacially what your saying with out the WA & SA ratings the TV ratings would be around the same as last year or down on last year

great effort to try and hide that fact, thickshit no3

Xman wrote:

You of all people have no right to talk about being discredited. In your short time on here you've made some of the most idiotic claims this site has seen. Up the top is the claim the AFLs crowds are better because one city is bleak and the other 2 are built 2kms from the desert.

Mal wrote:

Dear Leagueyboy..........just to clarify the ratings for you and all the mentally challenged rabble ball zealots out there: The current RL ratings increase of 30%+ includes the increase for SA and WA which makes up about 2%. So this means the overall increase, without WA and SA, is 28%.

I don't expect you to understand this but please get mummy to check it over with you. Also: there are remedial tutors out there that may be able to help.

Swans4ever wrote:

Mal wrote:

Dear Leagueyboy..........just to clarify the ratings for you and all the mentally challenged rabble ball zealots out there: The current RL ratings increase of 30%+ includes the increase for SA and WA which makes up about 2%. So this means the overall increase, without WA and SA, is 28%.

I don't expect you to understand this but please get mummy to check it over with you. Also: there are remedial tutors out there that may be able to help.

Did you take off your shoes and socks to get those figures? Your talking about very small increases - by putting it into percentages is a very good way to say there is an increase but if Ai have 10 people watch a game regularly out of 50,000 and the next month 1 more person watches you could say there is a 10% increase but reality is the increase is marginal - good try but not chocolates!

Swans4ever wrote:

Mal wrote:

Dear Leagueyboy..........just to clarify the ratings for you and all the mentally challenged rabble ball zealots out there: The current RL ratings increase of 30%+ includes the increase for SA and WA which makes up about 2%. So this means the overall increase, without WA and SA, is 28%.

I don't expect you to understand this but please get mummy to check it over with you. Also: there are remedial tutors out there that may be able to help.

Did you take off your shoes and socks to get those figures? Your talking about very small increases - by putting it into percentages is a very good way to say there is an increase but if Ai have 10 people watch a game regularly out of 50,000 and the next month 1 more person watches you could say there is a 10% increase but reality is the increase is marginal - good try but not chocolates!

Mal wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

Mal wrote:

Dear oh dear Leaguey.....I did tell you to check with your Mum before sending........LOLOLOLOL....You really have trouble with numbers don't you. For Gods sake get someone to check the table with you!!!

The ratings are up 29% on the TOTAL compared to last year. The increase represents over 8.5 million viewers. Of those 230,000 can be attributed to Perth and Adelaide......a minuscule amount of the overall increase.

The 11% Fox increase is the average increase for each game not the TOTAL which is obvioulsy massively higher as they now simulcast all FTA games. Why Wookie has done it like that I don't know.

Now I don't expect you take this all in but for the sake of your sanity please get Mummy to explain it to you wery wery wery slowly.......LOLOLOLO

so basacially what your saying with out the WA & SA ratings the TV ratings would be around the same as last year or down on last year

great effort to try and hide that fact, thickshit no3

Can someone help this dill?? Please.....please Leaguey .....people are laughing at you. I take back some of what I said about you.......you're not a liar........you're just a very very stupid specimen of the genus homo sapien sapien.

pussycat wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Mal wrote:

Dear Leagueyboy..........just to clarify the ratings for you and all the mentally challenged rabble ball zealots out there: The current RL ratings increase of 30%+ includes the increase for SA and WA which makes up about 2%. So this means the overall increase, without WA and SA, is 28%.

I don't expect you to understand this but please get mummy to check it over with you. Also: there are remedial tutors out there that may be able to help.

Did you take off your shoes and socks to get those figures? Your talking about very small increases - by putting it into percentages is a very good way to say there is an increase but if Ai have 10 people watch a game regularly out of 50,000 and the next month 1 more person watches you could say there is a 10% increase but reality is the increase is marginal - good try but not chocolates!

it not a marginal increase though is it ! Its an increase of way more than 1/2 a million a round.

Mal wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Mal wrote:

Dear Leagueyboy..........just to clarify the ratings for you and all the mentally challenged rabble ball zealots out there: The current RL ratings increase of 30%+ includes the increase for SA and WA which makes up about 2%. So this means the overall increase, without WA and SA, is 28%.

I don't expect you to understand this but please get mummy to check it over with you. Also: there are remedial tutors out there that may be able to help.

Did you take off your shoes and socks to get those figures? Your talking about very small increases - by putting it into percentages is a very good way to say there is an increase but if Ai have 10 people watch a game regularly out of 50,000 and the next month 1 more person watches you could say there is a 10% increase but reality is the increase is marginal - good try but not chocolates!

"Swanette, for a start there is a PNG side that plays in the Cairns AFL competition which is semi professional", you are once again showing that rabble ball zealots are either very very stupid or outright liars. I suspect they're both sadly!!!!!

The NRL has had an increase of 8.5 million viewers over last year to date - in TOTAL. Can you not process this information you dill. That is not a very small increase as you say. That is a massive 30%.

You and all your rabble ball mates seriously need to go back to school. That of course is presuming you've actually been to school......LOLOLOLOLOL......GET HELP YOU FIRST CLASS DILLS!!!!!

Intentcity wrote:

So I'm guessing Mal is Raiderdave in drag?