Talking Footy

Anyway, looks to be a sellout or close too at Penrith.

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

No, you post the fta ratings and be done with it please.

No. and why the fuck would we. The game is broadcast on two broadcasters. Not one. people watching on fox arent the same people watching on FTA. So no, we'll be posting both and still pissing ourselves at your pathetic crowds.

Well fuck me, post them all and be done with it instead of getting all shitty aye.

They are irrelevant and we all still laugh at your pathetic ratings after 30+ years of shoving it down our fucking throats.

:>::

not sure what you expect of an expansion sport. The swans ratings are regularly 1/4 the NRL's in Sydney. This means 1 in 5 sports fan in Sydney is choosing AFL over NRL

:_<>
U are now challenging forrest as this sites biggest wanker

Swines
70k people in Sydney wholl watch them on TV

Parramatta
250K
Bulldogs
250K
Dragons
200k
Souths
200K
Tigers
175K
Manly
150K
Roosters
150K
Penrith
125K
Sharks
125K

so

Is that 1/5 you dribbling ****** :_<>

comprehension fail :_<>

Swans last year rated around 50-80k FTA and 20-30k foxtel in Sydney. Most NRL games rated 330-400k in Sydney.

Therefore on average the Swans were 1/4 to 1/5th the NRL's ratings. Therefore 1 in 5 Sydney sider chose the Swans on TV over the NRL

the comprehension fail is yours you reta.rded halfwit

you are attempting to say that theres 1 shirt lifting swines fan to every 5 NRL fans in Sydney

well no I'm not actually. Read my comment s l o w l y

"Therefore 1 in 5 Sydney sider choses the Swans on TV over the NRL"

So, if the swans are playing on a FN against the NRL, for every 5 people watching 1 is choosing to watch the AFL over the NRL. It has nothing to do with the total number of fans in the city you idiot!

Get it yet, or do you want an even simpler explanation???

:_<>

Vicderpians
Pigshit for brains

The FN NRL game wouldnt have half of Sydneys NRL fans watching it

We have 9 sides as I said

While the fumbles n bumbles has 1 side
So nearly every bumbleball fan Sydney will be watching them


Still going with the 1/5 wanker ?

OMG, I just said It has nothing to do with the total number of fans in the city you idiot!

Its a comparison of the TV audience at the time both games are on, whcih is totally reasonable given this was a discussion about TV ratings, not total fan numbers

Fuck youre stupid!!

I couldn't give a fuck wot u said
U are a wanker

Wot has 1/5 fumbletards to NRL fans watching a game in Sydney got to do with anything
For the tenth time
When there are 9 NRL sides n 1 fumbles n bumbles team

You are obviously too stupid to comprehend wot im saying

Fumbletards
As thick as dog shit :_<>

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Anyway, looks to be a sellout or close too at Penrith.

Yeah

Around 18, 000 id say.

18, 814 @ penrith on a hot steamy afternoon

Pulsating finish too with the pennys holding on
Great entertainment

NRL off to a great start in 2015

NlolRL wrote:

AFLsforPussies wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

fair enough too. They might even get an average home crowd which is more than half the Swans!

The Swans get crowds but their tv ratings are dismal in Sydney. While GWS are going backwards and being destroyed by the Wanderers in Western Sydney.

Come back when AFL can actually get another nation to actually turn up and watch their game lol.

many of their tv ratings are around 100k in Sydney when you count FTA and Fox. That's around 1/3 to 1/4 the NRL on TV in Sydney. How is 1/4 of the heartland sport dismal?

If AFLs Sydney ratings were that good it would be shown on Ch 7 instead of the low rating fill in channel 7mate.

The Swans barely made the news when they made the grand final in Sydney. Was all about South Sydney. You AFL fans really have no idea how little most people care about Victorias game.

It is shown clearly with GWS going backwards with merchandise sales and sponsorship.

AFLsforPussies wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

AFLsforPussies wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

fair enough too. They might even get an average home crowd which is more than half the Swans!

The Swans get crowds but their tv ratings are dismal in Sydney. While GWS are going backwards and being destroyed by the Wanderers in Western Sydney.

Come back when AFL can actually get another nation to actually turn up and watch their game lol.

many of their tv ratings are around 100k in Sydney when you count FTA and Fox. That's around 1/3 to 1/4 the NRL on TV in Sydney. How is 1/4 of the heartland sport dismal?

If AFLs Sydney ratings were that good it would be shown on Ch 7 instead of the low rating fill in channel 7mate.

The Swans barely made the news when they made the grand final in Sydney. Was all about South Sydney. You AFL fans really have no idea how little most people care about Victorias game.

It is shown clearly with GWS going backwards with merchandise sales and sponsorship.

the fact they get 50-80k on a secondary digital channel (plus foxtel) while competing against the NRL is a good effort. Of course they are minor news, just like the storm down here

NlolRL wrote:

AFLsforPussies wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

AFLsforPussies wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

fair enough too. They might even get an average home crowd which is more than half the Swans!

The Swans get crowds but their tv ratings are dismal in Sydney. While GWS are going backwards and being destroyed by the Wanderers in Western Sydney.

Come back when AFL can actually get another nation to actually turn up and watch their game lol.

many of their tv ratings are around 100k in Sydney when you count FTA and Fox. That's around 1/3 to 1/4 the NRL on TV in Sydney. How is 1/4 of the heartland sport dismal?

If AFLs Sydney ratings were that good it would be shown on Ch 7 instead of the low rating fill in channel 7mate.

The Swans barely made the news when they made the grand final in Sydney. Was all about South Sydney. You AFL fans really have no idea how little most people care about Victorias game.

It is shown clearly with GWS going backwards with merchandise sales and sponsorship.

the fact they get 50-80k on a secondary digital channel (plus foxtel) while competing against the NRL is a good effort. Of course they are minor news, just like the storm down here

The difference is the Swans had a long 100 year history in Melbourne and have been around 15 years longer in Sydney the the Storm have in Melbourne. So that is a huge head start.

Melbourne started from scratch with no existing fans in another city like the Swans. They are doing well in an AFL mad city.

NlolRL wrote:

AFLsforPussies wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

AFLsforPussies wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

fair enough too. They might even get an average home crowd which is more than half the Swans!

The Swans get crowds but their tv ratings are dismal in Sydney. While GWS are going backwards and being destroyed by the Wanderers in Western Sydney.

Come back when AFL can actually get another nation to actually turn up and watch their game lol.

many of their tv ratings are around 100k in Sydney when you count FTA and Fox. That's around 1/3 to 1/4 the NRL on TV in Sydney. How is 1/4 of the heartland sport dismal?

If AFLs Sydney ratings were that good it would be shown on Ch 7 instead of the low rating fill in channel 7mate.

The Swans barely made the news when they made the grand final in Sydney. Was all about South Sydney. You AFL fans really have no idea how little most people care about Victorias game.

It is shown clearly with GWS going backwards with merchandise sales and sponsorship.

the fact they get 50-80k on a secondary digital channel (plus foxtel) while competing against the NRL is a good effort. Of course they are minor news, just like the storm down here

The fact they only get 50k in the first place is the reason they are on a secondary digital channel

You dribbling wanker

They are jokes

End of

so much of a joke they double almost every Sydney NRL team for crowds

NlolRL wrote:

so much of a joke they double almost every Sydney NRL team for crowds

& cant outrate the teletubbies on tv

You seem to keep forgetting that
Ah well
You are a pig shit for brains know nothing vic.tar.d wanker

Wot else can we expect

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

so much of a joke they double almost every Sydney NRL team for crowds

& cant outrate the teletubbies on tv

You seem to keep forgetting that
Ah well
You are a pig shit for brains know nothing vic.tar.d wanker

Wot else can we expect

weve covered that. 1/4 the ratings of the NRL which is perfectly reasonable. Double the NRL crowds which is outstanding. You got nothin

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

so much of a joke they double almost every Sydney NRL team for crowds

& cant outrate the teletubbies on tv

You seem to keep forgetting that
Ah well
You are a pig shit for brains know nothing vic.tar.d wanker

Wot else can we expect

weve covered that. 1/4 the ratings of the NRL which is perfectly reasonable. Double the NRL crowds which is outstanding. You got nothin

1/4

:_<>

The NRL in sydney attracts 2 million veiwers each n every week
Thats 30 times the swines pathetic 70k figure

We have 9 sides

You are comparing 1 game
& trying to say thats it

You are a tosser
A wanker

A bubble dwelling vic.ta.rd halfwit dribbler

Give up
Cos its you who has nuttin

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

so much of a joke they double almost every Sydney NRL team for crowds

& cant outrate the teletubbies on tv

You seem to keep forgetting that
Ah well
You are a pig shit for brains know nothing vic.tar.d wanker

Wot else can we expect

weve covered that. 1/4 the ratings of the NRL which is perfectly reasonable. Double the NRL crowds which is outstanding. You got nothin

1/4

:_<>

The NRL in sydney attracts 2 million veiwers each n every week
Thats 30 times the swines pathetic 70k figure

We have 9 sides

You are comparing 1 game
& trying to say thats it

You are a tosser
A wanker

A bubble dwelling vic.ta.rd halfwit dribbler

Give up
Cos its you who has nuttin

so now youve moved onto cummulative ratings.

One single FN night, Swans v NRL, 80k v 360k

The maths is very simple

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

NlolRL wrote:

so much of a joke they double almost every Sydney NRL team for crowds

& cant outrate the teletubbies on tv

You seem to keep forgetting that
Ah well
You are a pig shit for brains know nothing vic.tar.d wanker

Wot else can we expect

weve covered that. 1/4 the ratings of the NRL which is perfectly reasonable. Double the NRL crowds which is outstanding. You got nothin

1/4

:_<>

The NRL in sydney attracts 2 million veiwers each n every week
Thats 30 times the swines pathetic 70k figure

We have 9 sides

You are comparing 1 game
& trying to say thats it

You are a tosser
A wanker

A bubble dwelling vic.ta.rd halfwit dribbler

Give up
Cos its you who has nuttin

so now youve moved onto cummulative ratings.

One single FN night, Swans v NRL, 80k v 360k

The maths is very simple

:_<>

We dont have 1 side you blithering wanker
We have 9

You continue to think theres only 1 game & 2 sides in sydney

If every NRL fan in Sydney watched ... 1 game
It would surpass 1 million

Thats yr figure
15 times the swines figure
Not 4


Its obvious you arent real bright
A vicderpian wanker
Uneducated
Bubble dweller
Deluded
Not in touch with reality

But try... try n have a think about it
N quit
You are so far behind its embarrasing

it really is very simple. Of the 450k or so that typically watch sport on a friday night in Sydney 1 in every 5 will tune into the swans rather than NRL