Page 5 of 5

Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 3:54 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
Lies.

Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 8:37 pm
by Raiderdave
NlolRL wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Hmmmm, I wonder how many Parra games on a friday night we would need to outrate the whole season from the swans shown in Sydney?

You reckon it would be 1 or 2 games max?

Couldn't be no more, they only average around 50k a week :(/
70k plus foxtel, so around 100k per home game.

:rock:
it would be 70k with fox you lying ***** :^o :^o :^o :^o
but even if it were 100K

it would take just 2.5 Parramatta games to wipe the Swines entire season out in Sydney :lol: :lol: :(/ :(/ :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :lol: :lol: :(/ :(/ :(/ :_<> :_<> :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/

Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 9:51 pm
by leagueiscrap
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Hmmmm, I wonder how many Parra games on a friday night we would need to outrate the whole season from the swans shown in Sydney?

You reckon it would be 1 or 2 games max?

Couldn't be no more, they only average around 50k a week :(/
keep crawling back to the ratings
those 5000 boxes that represent 23 million Australians
why is it that the swans have the highest, membership, crows & revenue & sponsorship in NSW by a long way?

Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:26 pm
by AFLcrap1
leagueiscrap wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Hmmmm, I wonder how many Parra games on a friday night we would need to outrate the whole season from the swans shown in Sydney?

You reckon it would be 1 or 2 games max?

Couldn't be no more, they only average around 50k a week :(/
keep crawling back to the ratings
those 5000 boxes that represent 23 million Australians
why is it that the swans have the highest, membership, crows & revenue & sponsorship in NSW by a long way?
Wait on ...you told us the other day that 1 ratings box =hundreds of thousands viewers.


Get your facts straight .

Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:38 pm
by leagueiscrap
AFLcrap1 wrote:
leagueiscrap wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Hmmmm, I wonder how many Parra games on a friday night we would need to outrate the whole season from the swans shown in Sydney?

You reckon it would be 1 or 2 games max?

Couldn't be no more, they only average around 50k a week :(/
keep crawling back to the ratings
those 5000 boxes that represent 23 million Australians
why is it that the swans have the highest, membership, crows & revenue & sponsorship in NSW by a long way?
Wait on ...you told us the other day that 1 ratings box =hundreds of thousands viewers.


Get your facts straight .
do we need to pull up some annual reports for proof, on how minnow your NRL clubs are

Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:40 pm
by AFLcrap1
You dumb fuck .
We are talking about how you claimed that 1 ratings box = 100,000s.
Get with the programme stupid

Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported

Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:40 pm
by leagueiscrap
AFLcrap1 wrote:
You dumb fuck .
We are talking about how you claimed that 1 ratings box = 100,000s.
Get with the programme stupid
am with the program dipshit

you are struggle to comprehend how little and shit the NRL is :)))

Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported

Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:49 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
RL is a way bigger sport than your little game crap!

Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported

Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:59 pm
by AFLcrap1
leagueiscrap wrote:
AFLcrap1 wrote:
You dumb fuck .
We are talking about how you claimed that 1 ratings box = 100,000s.
Get with the programme stupid
am with the program dipshit

you are struggle to comprehend how little and shit the NRL is :)))
:[] :[] :[] :[] :[]

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
The only thing you are with is a bottle of metho.

Now explain how 1 ratings box = hundreds of thousands of viewers.

Is your brain that scrambled that basic Maths is beyond you?.

Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported

Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:39 pm
by Phelpsy
How many rating boxes are there? Wookie will know. I don't think it is that many, I think I read 3000 somewhere, but I do know that for statistics that's a good number to draw inference to the wider population .

Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported

Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 6:37 pm
by leagueiscrap
Phelpsy wrote:
How many rating boxes are there? Wookie will know. I don't think it is that many, I think I read 3000 somewhere, but I do know that for statistics that's a good number to draw inference to the wider population .
3000k for metro across 5 major capatal cities
2000k for regional mostly covering Victoria, NSW and QLD

http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/research/b ... 2whole.pdf
page 28

Re: Sydney Swans **** the least supported

Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 10:31 pm
by AFLcrap1
leagueiscrap wrote:
Phelpsy wrote:
How many rating boxes are there? Wookie will know. I don't think it is that many, I think I read 3000 somewhere, but I do know that for statistics that's a good number to draw inference to the wider population .
3000k for metro across 5 major capatal cities
2000k for regional mostly covering Victoria, NSW and QLD

http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/research/b ... 2whole.pdf
page 28
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
& yet you claim that 1 ratings box = hundreds of thousands of viewers.

So according to our resident dumb hick ..5000 boxes must cover .....drum roll please........
200,000 x 5000 = 1 billion.

Boy oh boy hasn't Australia had a population explosion lately...
Or you are a fucking idiot..
I go with option B.