Talking Footy

Raiderdave, it would help if you provided those playing figures to further pressure TLPG and NRLCrap1. TV ratings are not relevant to this thread. I will be editing your thread as it is AFL, not VFL.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Really, so by showing that the National capitals newspaper has RL first in its sports section doesn't tell us something?

Yes. That the editor of the Canberra Times loves rugby league and nothing more than that.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

I suppose that the news on each channel every night national and local always leading with RL is also going against the sporting grain in Canberra too eh?

The Raiders are the only elite level club in Canberra so of course it will lead with that. It doesn't make Canberra a bona fide rugby league city. It would be the same with the Brumbies.

Cracker wrote:

Raiderdave, it would help if you provided those playing figures to further pressure TLPG and NRLCrap1. TV ratings are not relevant to this thread. I will be editing your thread as it is AFL, not VFL.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Really, so by showing that the National capitals newspaper has RL first in its sports section doesn't tell us something?

Yes. That the editor of the Canberra Times loves rugby league and nothing more than that.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

I suppose that the news on each channel every night national and local always leading with RL is also going against the sporting grain in Canberra too eh?

The Raiders are the only elite level club in Canberra so of course it will lead with that. It doesn't make Canberra a bona fide rugby league city. It would be the same with the Brumbies.

TLPG wrote:

And wait a minute - isn't it FEDERAL money that pays for any upgrade at the Raider's home, because it's on FEDERAL land at the AIS??

.[/quote]

the Raiders home dickhead is about 500m down the road from Canberra Stadium on the Corner of Hayden Drive & Battye St Bruce
a state of the art facility owned by the Raiders outright &

on


Private Land


:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
seriously
you are never right about anything

ever

are you re.t.a.r.d.ed ?
serious question
its ok of course .... but you should be in an institution or something .... not embarrassing yourself in a public forum like this

Cracker wrote:

Raiderdave, it would help if you provided those playing figures to further pressure TLPG and NRLCrap1. TV ratings are not relevant to this thread. I will be editing your thread as it is AFL, not VFL.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Really, so by showing that the National capitals newspaper has RL first in its sports section doesn't tell us something?

Yes. That the editor of the Canberra Times loves rugby league and nothing more than that.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

I suppose that the news on each channel every night national and local always leading with RL is also going against the sporting grain in Canberra too eh?

The Raiders are the only elite level club in Canberra so of course it will lead with that. It doesn't make Canberra a bona fide rugby league city. It would be the same with the Brumbies.

you are



a cockhead !!

Private land Dave, seriously are ever right about anything?

Leasehold.

MissPenny wrote:

Private land Dave, seriously are ever right about anything?

Leasehold.

Whos the leaseholder you silly mole

They own the lease
Its private land

Get back in the kitchen you dopey slag

Wrong again Davey...

MissPenny wrote:

Wrong again Davey...

right again bitch
if you hold the lease on land .... its your property , the only conditions are you comply with the zoning laws attached to that land.

again
keep to what your good at
washing & ironing

the Laundry is this way /..........

No, Raiderdave, if the land is leasehold you have to lease it from someone. You do not own it.

Cracker wrote:

No, Raiderdave, if the land is leasehold you have to lease it from someone. You do not own it.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

sure cwackpot ... sure
when you're right.... about anything

we'll consult you then
til then

:_<> :_<> :_<>

you have legal use of the land for.... 99 years to do with as you wish provided you observe zoning laws
its as good as

owned dickhead

Raiderdave wrote:

MissPenny wrote:

Wrong again Davey...

right again bitch
if you hold the lease on land .... its your property , the only conditions are you comply with the zoning laws attached to that land.

again
keep to what your good at
washing & ironing

the Laundry is this way /..........

& delusional dave keep doing what you are good at, having no friggen idea

Raiderdave wrote:

Cracker wrote:

No, Raiderdave, if the land is leasehold you have to lease it from someone. You do not own it.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

sure cwackpot ... sure
when you're right.... about anything

we'll consult you then
til then

:_<> :_<> :_<>

you have legal use of the land for.... 99 years to do with as you wish provided you observe zoning laws
its as good as

owned dickhead

It's not. It's a leasehold. It's a 99 year lease. It's a rental arrangement. It is not ownership of the land.

Dave is such an easy target, it's like shooting fish in a barrel...too easy.

He's the biggest goose on this forum!

MissPenny wrote:

Dave is such an easy target, it's like shooting fish in a barrel...too easy.

oi bitch

who let you outta the Kitchen ?

back in ya go
Dinner & snap to it .... Im hungry :<> :<> :<> :<> :<> :<>