Page 5 of 6
Re: Who should go and who should stay
Posted: Sun May 11, 2014 6:20 pm
by AFLcrap1
Cracker wrote:It is impossible to be happy when you, AFLCrap1 and Raiderdave create so much anger through your respective levels of conduct. Miss Penny never said anything about being happy. Being entertained does not equal being happy.
The bad eggs have not been disposed of. The proof is that you are still here, being rude, obnoxious, facetious and any other synonym available if I had a thesaurus handy. Things were much better when the agreed rules were upheld and activity was high.
You don't want it to go back to that because you know that you'll be held to a count for your false claims, and so will everyone else without exception - especially Raiderdave, You also know you'll be held to account for your abuse and rudeness.
How's this for rudeness?.
Go & get Fucked you lying braindead ******.
Re: Who should go and who should stay
Posted: Sun May 11, 2014 6:39 pm
by MissPenny
Charming!
Re: Who should go and who should stay
Posted: Sun May 11, 2014 6:48 pm
by leagueiscrap
Cracker wrote:It is impossible to be happy when you, AFLCrap1 and Raiderdave create so much anger through your respective levels of conduct. Miss Penny never said anything about being happy. Being entertained does not equal being happy.
The bad eggs have not been disposed of. The proof is that you are still here, being rude, obnoxious, facetious and any other synonym available if I had a thesaurus handy. Things were much better when the agreed rules were upheld and activity was high.
You don't want it to go back to that because you know that you'll be held to a count for your false claims, and so will everyone else without exception - especially Raiderdave, You also know you'll be held to account for your abuse and rudeness.
dave might need to be excused as would be rather inexperienced and not often have the opportunity to talk to people from the opposite sex, apart from his mum and nurse
Re: Who should go and who should stay
Posted: Sun May 11, 2014 7:02 pm
by AFLcrap1
leagueiscrap wrote:Cracker wrote:It is impossible to be happy when you, AFLCrap1 and Raiderdave create so much anger through your respective levels of conduct. Miss Penny never said anything about being happy. Being entertained does not equal being happy.
The bad eggs have not been disposed of. The proof is that you are still here, being rude, obnoxious, facetious and any other synonym available if I had a thesaurus handy. Things were much better when the agreed rules were upheld and activity was high.
You don't want it to go back to that because you know that you'll be held to a count for your false claims, and so will everyone else without exception - especially Raiderdave, You also know you'll be held to account for your abuse and rudeness.
dave might need to be excused as would be rather inexperienced and not often have the opportunity to talk to people from the opposite sex, apart from his mum and nurse
Do you still have your Adam Account?.
Re: Who should go and who should stay
Posted: Sun May 11, 2014 10:54 pm
by Cracker
No they are not, because your level of rudeness is well beyond acceptable. If you do not like my opinion, I'm sure it will be easy for you to find the "Logout" link and use it to leave.
Re: Who should go and who should stay
Posted: Mon May 12, 2014 6:54 am
by AFLcrap1
Re: Who should go and who should stay
Posted: Mon May 12, 2014 10:22 am
by Cracker
I was actually speaking to King Eliagh, AFLcrap1, not you. But having said that, if I become the moderatir here your comment at the top of this page would be deleted as personal abuse. Not to mention abusing the moderator which Xman in the past firmly prohibited as well, and I think it would attract a warning from the administrator of this forum.
Re: Who should go and who should stay
Posted: Mon May 12, 2014 1:50 pm
by NRLCrap1
^^^^^
Here's a lack of happiness, you flock of geese!
Re: Who should go and who should stay
Posted: Wed May 14, 2014 7:25 pm
by AFLcrap1
NRLCrap1 wrote:
^^^^^
Here's a lack of happiness, you flock of geese!
Warning warning
SPAMBOT alert.
Re: Who should go and who should stay
Posted: Wed May 14, 2014 9:00 pm
by Fred
Someone spamming someone accusing them of spamming .... The paradox
Re: Who should go and who should stay
Posted: Thu May 15, 2014 7:43 am
by King-Eliagh
I'm sorry phelpsy but spambot fully deserves its name. We've got it picked. It's clear as day that something which produces irrelevant one liners thus scarcely contributing to this site is a spambot. There's nuttin more to it really. I urge you, as one of us humans, to call it by its real name too now phelpsy.
Re: Who should go and who should stay
Posted: Thu May 15, 2014 7:45 am
by King-Eliagh
But this doesn't mean we don't love it. We do! We love kickin that piece o' shit program from her to Kentucky and back
Re: Who should go and who should stay
Posted: Thu May 15, 2014 5:39 pm
by Cracker
Phelpsy wrote:Someone spamming someone accusing them of spamming .... The paradox
This is why, should I become moderator, I will be putting a stop to it.
Re: Who should go and who should stay
Posted: Thu May 15, 2014 6:28 pm
by AFLcrap1
Cracker wrote:Phelpsy wrote:Someone spamming someone accusing them of spamming .... The paradox
This is why, should I become moderator, I will be putting a stop to it.
How many fucking posts are you going to say .
IF I become MOD...
If I become MOD..
BLAH BLAH BLAH.
You're not a mod & & Bea seems in no hurry to make you one ..(possibly he knows you a Coke short of a McHappy Meal.).
So put your power trip on hold & come back to Planet Earth .
& stop sucking up to the Stalker.
Re: Who should go and who should stay
Posted: Thu May 15, 2014 10:02 pm
by Fred
Hey, I'm on the sunny coast on the weekend ... I can say hi to your daughter for ya if you like....
